Prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) by mRNA-Based Vaccines Within the General Population of California

被引:39
|
作者
Andrejko, Kristin L. [1 ]
Pry, Jake [2 ]
Myers, Jennifer F. [2 ]
Jewell, Nicholas P. [1 ,3 ]
Openshaw, John [2 ]
Watt, James [2 ]
Jain, Seema [2 ]
Lewnard, Joseph A. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Calif Dept Publ Hlth, Richmond, CA USA
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Infect Dis & Vaccinol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Coll Engn, Ctr Computat Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; real-world evidence; test-negative design; vaccine effectiveness; SARS-COV-2; INFECTION; UNITED-STATES; BNT162B2; HESITANCY; WORKERS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciab640
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Vaccination is preventing documented SARS-CoV-2 infection in California, with 68% and 91% effectiveness against asymptomatic and symptomatic infection, respectively. Vaccine effectiveness was equivalent for BNT126b2 and mRNA-1273. Only 66% of unvaccinated participants were willing to receive the vaccine when eligible. Background Estimates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness under real-world conditions, and understanding of barriers to uptake, are necessary to inform vaccine rollout. Methods We enrolled cases (testing positive) and controls (testing negative) from among the population whose SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic test results from 24 February to 29 April 2021 were reported to the California Department of Public Health. Participants were matched on age, sex, and geographic region. We assessed participants' self-reported history of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine receipt (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273). Participants were considered fully vaccinated 2 weeks after second dose receipt. Among unvaccinated participants, we assessed willingness to receive vaccination. We measured vaccine effectiveness (VE) via the matched odds ratio of prior vaccination, comparing cases with controls. Results We enrolled 1023 eligible participants aged >= 18 years. Among 525 cases, 71 (13.5%) received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273; 20 (3.8%) were fully vaccinated with either product. Among 498 controls, 185 (37.1%) received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273; 86 (16.3%) were fully vaccinated with either product. Two weeks after second dose receipt, VE was 87.0% (95% confidence interval: 68.6-94.6%) and 86.2% (68.4-93.9%) for BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively. Fully vaccinated participants receiving either product experienced 91.3% (79.3-96.3%) and 68.3% (27.9-85.7%) VE against symptomatic and asymptomatic infection, respectively. Among unvaccinated participants, 42.4% (159/375) residing in rural regions and 23.8% (67/281) residing in urban regions reported hesitancy to receive COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusions Authorized mRNA-based vaccines are effective at reducing documented SARS-CoV-2 infections within the general population of California. Vaccine hesitancy presents a barrier to reaching coverage levels needed for herd immunity.
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An overview of current drugs and prophylactic vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Alagheband Bahrami, Armina
    Azargoonjahromi, Ali
    Sadraei, Samin
    Aarabi, Aryan
    Payandeh, Zahra
    Rajabibazl, Masoumeh
    CELLULAR & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [32] Prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in public places
    Pan, Lijun
    Wang, Jiao
    Wang, Xianliang
    Ji, John S.
    Ye, Dan
    Shen, Jin
    Li, Li
    Liu, Hang
    Zhang, Liubo
    Shi, Xiaoming
    Wang, Lin
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2022, 292
  • [33] Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Prevention and Control in the Radiology Department
    Hamm, Rebecca
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 91 (05) : 485 - 488
  • [34] Consensus for prevention and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for neurologists
    Jin, Huijuan
    Hong, Candong
    Chen, Shengcai
    Zhou, Yifan
    Wang, Yong
    Mao, Ling
    Li, Yanan
    He, Quanwei
    Li, Man
    Su, Ying
    Wang, David
    Wang, Longde
    Hu, Bo
    STROKE AND VASCULAR NEUROLOGY, 2020, 5 (02) : 146 - 151
  • [35] Impfung gegen coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Birgit Weinberger
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2022, 55 : 558 - 563
  • [36] Relationship Between Vaccines Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) and Myocarditis
    Silva Dias, Lorena Araujo
    Pinto Blazuti Barreto, Nathalia Monerat
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 254 : 253 - 253
  • [37] Relationship Between Vaccines Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) and Myocarditis
    Silva Dias, Lorena Araujo
    Pinto, Nathalia Monerat
    Barreto, Blazuti
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 254 : 249 - 249
  • [38] Vaccines in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era: Game theory applications
    Papadakis, Marios
    Spernovasilis, Nikolaos
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 43 (07): : 957 - 958
  • [39] An overview of current drugs and prophylactic vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Armina Alagheband Bahrami
    Ali Azargoonjahromi
    Samin Sadraei
    Aryan Aarabi
    Zahra Payandeh
    Masoumeh Rajabibazl
    Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, 2022, 27
  • [40] COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019): A New Coronavirus Disease
    Dousari, Amin Sadeghi
    Moghadam, Majid Taati
    Satarzadeh, Naghmeh
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2020, 13 : 2819 - 2828