Renal Dysfunction is the Strongest Prognostic Factor After Carotid Artery Stenting According to Real-World Data

被引:4
|
作者
Miyake, Shigeta [1 ]
Suzuki, Ryosuke [2 ]
Akimoto, Taisuke [3 ]
Iida, Yu [2 ]
Shimohigoshi, Wataru [3 ]
Nakai, Yasunobu [1 ]
Manaka, Hiroshi [3 ]
Shimizu, Nobuyuki [2 ]
Yamamoto, Tetsuya [2 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama Brain & Spine Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Isogo Ku, 1-2-1 Takigashira, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2350012, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Grad Sch Med, 3-9 Fukuura, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360004, Japan
[3] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Med Ctr, Minami Ku, 4-57 Urafune, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2320024, Japan
来源
关键词
CAS; Delirium; eGFR; mRS; Retrospective multicenter analysis; HIGH-RISK; ENDARTERECTOMY; REVASCULARIZATION; STROKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106269
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Purpose: Through the progression of devices, the adaptation of carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been expanded according to the non-inferiority of CAS for carotid endarterectomy reported by several randomized control trials. To maintain favorable outcomes, identifying prognostic factors is essential for optimizing treatment indications and periprocedural management. This study focused on the prognostic factors of CAS using real-world data. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study aimed to identify the prognostic factors after CAS using real-world data from the stroke registry of Yokohama (STrOke Registry of Yokohama; STORY) from January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2021. Patient characteristics, procedural factors, complications, and prognoses were collected using medical records. Results: Data from 107 patients were enrolled in this study after excluding those with insufficient data (2 cases). The mean participant age was 74.9 8.2 years, and 66 patients (61.7%) were symptomatic. Symptomatic lesions were a signifi-cant prognostic factor in the overall analysis (p=0.003). A multivariate analysis showed that the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (odds ratio: 1.11, p=0.003) and staged CAS (odds ratio: 38.9, p=0.04) were independent prognostic factors. The odds ratio and relative risk of mRS deterioration when eGFR was under 49 mL/min/1.73 m(2) compared with when eGFR was above 49 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were 5.2 and 3.74, respectively. Conclusions: In this real-world multicenter study, we established independent prognostic factors for CAS using high totality data. For patients with symptomatic lesions and low eGFR (< 49 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), indication for treatment should be considered strictly.& nbsp;
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cancer Screening in Renal Transplant Recipients: Real-World Data
    Al-thnaibat, Mohammad Hassan
    Nser, Sundus Yahya
    Alabdallat, Yasmeen Jamal
    Hajir, Maysoun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (04) : 592 - 597
  • [22] Elasticity of the carotid artery walls as a prognostic factor for the occurrence of restenosis after a surgery for internal carotid artery stenosis
    Eberhardt, Andrzej
    Madycki, Grzegorz
    Hendiger, Wlodzimierz
    Staszkiewicz, Walerian
    Lewszuk, Adam
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2015, 73 (05) : 352 - 359
  • [23] Real-world observational data factor into FDA's decisions
    Thompson, Cheryl A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (06) : 338 - 339
  • [24] The prognostic values of serum markers in hepatocellular carcinoma after invasive therapies based on real-world data
    Li, Bo
    Liu, Aixia
    Wen, Yi
    Yang, Guang
    Zhao, Jing
    Li, Xiaohan
    Mao, Yuanli
    Li, Boan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2021, 35 (09)
  • [25] Comparison of short-term outcomes after carotid artery stenting according to different stent designs
    Sahin, Muslum
    Acar, Goksel
    Ozkan, Birol
    Alici, Gokhan
    Yazicioglu, Mehmet Vefik
    Bulut, Mustafa
    Kalkan, Mehmet Emin
    Demir, Serdar
    Acar, Rezzan Deniz
    Boztosun, Bilal
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2013, 9 (02): : 121 - 125
  • [26] Prognostic factor analysis of patients with small cell lung cancer: Real-world data from 988 patients
    Ma, Xiangjuan
    Zhang, Ziran
    Chen, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Jie
    Nie, Jun
    Da, Ling
    Hu, Weiheng
    Tian, Guangming
    Wu, Di
    Han, Jindi
    Han, Sen
    Long, Jieran
    Wang, Yang
    Fang, Jian
    THORACIC CANCER, 2021, 12 (12) : 1841 - 1850
  • [27] Prognostic and risk factor analysis of cancer patients after unplanned ICU admission: a real-world multicenter study
    Wei, Miao
    Huang, Mingguang
    Duan, Yan
    Wang, Donghao
    Xing, Xuezhong
    Quan, Rongxi
    Zhang, Guoxing
    Liu, Kaizhong
    Zhu, Biao
    Ye, Yong
    Zhou, Dongmin
    Zhao, Jianghong
    Ma, Gang
    Jiang, Zhengying
    Huang, Bing
    Xu, Shanling
    Xiao, Yun
    Zhang, Linlin
    Wang, Hongzhi
    Lin, Ruiyun
    Ma, Shuliang
    Qiu, Yu'an
    Wang, Changsong
    Zheng, Zhen
    Sun, Ni
    Xian, Lewu
    Li, Ji
    Zhang, Ming
    Guo, Zhijun
    Tao, Yong
    Zhang, Li
    Zhou, Xiangzhe
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Daoxie
    Chi, Jiyan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [28] An investigation of factors affecting post operative renal function insufficiency after carotid artery stenting
    Kanazawa, R.
    Yoshihara, T.
    Obuchi, H.
    Yusuke, T.
    Ochiai, I. K. U. O.
    Okawara, M.
    Kuniyoshi, N.
    Ishihara, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2014, 9 : 133 - 133
  • [29] Inflammation-based prognostic markers of metastatic pancreatic cancer using real-world data in Japan: The Tokushukai REAl-world Data (TREAD) project
    Shimoyama, Rai
    Imamura, Yoshinori
    Uryu, Kiyoaki
    Mase, Takahiro
    Shiragami, Megumi
    Fujimura, Yoshiaki
    Hayashi, Maki
    Ohtaki, Megu
    Ohtani, Keiko
    Shinozaki, Nobuaki
    Minami, Hironobu
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 27 (03)
  • [30] Prognostic and risk factor analysis of cancer patients after unplanned ICU admission: a real-world multicenter study
    Miao Wei
    Mingguang Huang
    Yan Duan
    Donghao Wang
    Xuezhong Xing
    Rongxi Quan
    Guoxing Zhang
    Kaizhong Liu
    Biao Zhu
    Yong Ye
    Dongmin Zhou
    Jianghong Zhao
    Gang Ma
    Zhengying Jiang
    Bing Huang
    Shanling Xu
    Yun Xiao
    Linlin Zhang
    Hongzhi Wang
    Ruiyun Lin
    Shuliang Ma
    Yu’an Qiu
    Changsong Wang
    Zhen Zheng
    Ni Sun
    Lewu Xian
    Ji Li
    Ming Zhang
    Zhijun Guo
    Yong Tao
    Li Zhang
    Xiangzhe Zhou
    Wei Chen
    Daoxie Wang
    Jiyan Chi
    Scientific Reports, 13