Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives

被引:62
|
作者
Rouanet, Philippe [1 ]
Bertrand, Martin Marie [1 ]
Jarlier, Marta [2 ]
Mourregot, Anne [1 ]
Traore, Drissa [1 ]
Taoum, Christophe [1 ]
de Forges, Helene [3 ]
Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Surg Oncol Dept, ICM, Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Biometr Unit, ICM, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, Clin Res Unit, ICM, Montpellier, France
关键词
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; ASSISTED RESECTION; MIDTERM OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; SHORT-TERM; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; PROCTECTOMY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-018-6738-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to compare robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) with laparoscopic TME (L-TME) in a series of consecutive rectal cancer patients.BackgroundR-TME and L-TME have drawn contradictory reports. A recent phase III trial (ROLARR) concluded that R-TME performed by surgeons with varying experience did not confer an advantage in rectal cancer resection.Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective single-center cohort study (8/2008 to 4/2015), data were prospectively registered. A total of 200 L-TME and 200 R-TME were operated consecutively without selection. The primary outcome was the conversion rate to open laparotomy or transanal TME. The secondary endpoints were type of anastomosis, operative time, postoperative morbidity, circumferential radial (CRM) and distal margins, quality of life, bladder and sexual dysfunction, and oncological outcomes.ResultsBaseline characteristics were well balanced. Type of anastomosis [colo-anal anastomosis (CAA) 40% vs 49%; p<0.001], transanal TME (5% vs 13%; p=0.005), and conversion rate (2% vs 9.5%; odd ratio (OR): 0.19 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.60]) were significantly different. Intersphincteric resection (39% vs 47%), diverting stoma (66.5% vs 68%), CRM involvement, median operative time (243 vs 232min), and R0 resection rate were similar. Conversion risk was lower for R-TME in male patients and those with small tumors (<5cm). The 3-year overall survival rate was 84.1% [77.3-88.9%] and 88.4% [82.9-92.2%] in the R-TME and L-TME group. No significant differences were reported in quality of life, and urinary or sexual function.ConclusionsR-TME is less likely to be converted to open surgery than L-TME; operative time and curative pathologic criteria are equivalent. Future prospective trial should compare standardized procedures performed by experienced surgeons for subgroups of high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:3572 / 3579
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study
    Mongin, Cecile
    Maggiori, Leon
    Agostini, Julie
    Ferron, Marianne
    Panis, Yves
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (04) : 459 - 467
  • [22] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Mesorectal Excision for Cancer of the High Rectum: A Single-Center Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Notarnicola, Margerita
    Martinez-Perez, Aleix
    Memeo, Riccardo
    Charpy, Cecile
    Urciuoli, Irene
    Maroso, Fabio
    Sommacale, Daniele
    Amiot, Aurelien
    Canoui-Poitrine, Florence
    Levesque, Eric
    Brunetti, Francesco
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (11) : 3923 - 3935
  • [23] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Mesorectal Excision for Cancer of the High Rectum: A Single-Center Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Margerita Notarnicola
    Aleix Martínez-Pérez
    Riccardo Memeo
    Cecile Charpy
    Irene Urciuoli
    Fabio Maroso
    Daniele Sommacale
    Aurelien Amiot
    Florence Canouï-Poitrine
    Eric Levesque
    Francesco Brunetti
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 3923 - 3935
  • [24] Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study
    Cécile Mongin
    Léon Maggiori
    Julie Agostini
    Marianne Ferron
    Yves Panis
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 459 - 467
  • [25] SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE AND EARLY ADAPTATION OF ROBOTIC AND LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED TRANSANAL TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION (TATME).
    Lee, S. G.
    Landry, M.
    Casillas, M.
    Russ, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (06) : E189 - E189
  • [26] Advantages of Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision With Partial Prostatectomy Compared With Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Shimano, Rumi
    Kasai, Shunsuke
    Kagawa, Hiroyasu
    Shiomi, Akio
    Manabe, Shoichi
    Yamaoka, Yusuke
    Tanaka, Yusuke
    Igaki, Takahiro
    Nankaku, Akitoshi
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [27] Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approachreport of a single-center experience
    Aselmann, Heiko
    Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas
    Bernsmeier, Alexander
    Beckmann, Jan Henrik
    Moeller, Thorben
    Egberts, Jan Hendrik
    Schafmayer, Clemens
    Roecken, Christoph
    Becker, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (11) : 1575 - 1581
  • [28] Complications Rate and Related Factors After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Preserving Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Study in Vietnam
    Phu, Ly Huu
    Bang, Ho Tat
    Viet, Ung Van
    Tan, Hoang Danh
    Tin, Nguyen Trung
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [29] Laparoscopic versus open techniques in rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis of 121 sphincter-saving procedures in a single institution
    Hwai-Ding Lam
    Mauro Stefano
    Tri Tran-Ba
    Nicolas Tinton
    Emmanuel Cambier
    Benoit Navez
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 454 - 462
  • [30] Robotic vs. laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-center analysis of 600 consecutive patients in 6 years
    Moritz Schmelzle
    Linda Feldbrügge
    Santiago Andres Ortiz Galindo
    Simon Moosburner
    Anika Kästner
    Felix Krenzien
    Christian Benzing
    Matthias Biebl
    Robert Öllinger
    Thomas Malinka
    Wenzel Schöning
    Johann Pratschke
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 (8) : 5854 - 5862