Evaluation of the Impact and Implementation of Social Prescribing in Primary Healthcare Units in Lisbon: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol

被引:10
|
作者
Hoffmeister, Louise Viecili [1 ,2 ]
Nunes, Mariana Fortuna [1 ]
Marta Figueiredo, Cristiano Emanuel [1 ,3 ]
Coelho, Andreia [3 ]
Fraga Oliveira, Mariana Filipa [3 ]
Massano, Paula [3 ]
Gama, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Aguiar, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Dias, Sonia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Ave Padre Cruz, P-1600560 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Comprehens Hlth Res Ctr CHRC, Campo Martires Patria 130, P-130116905 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Cent Lisbon Hlth Ctr Cluster, Rua Carvalho Araujo 103, P-103190018 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
关键词
social prescribing; complex interventions; integrated care; health promotion; study protocol; public health; DETERMINANTS; VOLUNTARY;
D O I
10.5334/ijic.5592
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Social Prescribing (SP) is an intervention to link users of the primary healthcare services to non-clinical organizations based on the community to tackle social determinants of health. Despite the potential benefits of SP, the effectiveness of this complex intervention remains uncertain. This paper presents the study protocol of the evaluation of the first SP project in Portugal. Methods: A mixed-methods study will be conducted to evaluate the SP project. For the quantitative component, a longitudinal, prospective study with a pre-post design will be performed. Data on patients referred to SP will be collected in four different points in time throughout the intervention, using questionnaires on patients' health status and sociodemographic characteristics, and scales on patients' well-being, quality of life and activation. The secondary data will be collected using patients' medical records and SP's forms about the referral and social responses elaborated within the intervention. Semi-structured interviews with patients and focus groups with stakeholders will be conducted to assess experiences of participation and improvement suggestions on SP. Conclusion: Comprehensive and complementary evidence will provide insights and learning for the implementation of future SP interventions. This can contribute to inform policy and practice, and to increase investment in social prescribing interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use and impact of social prescribing: a mixed-methods feasibility study protocol
    Jani, Anant
    Liyanage, Harshana
    Hoang, Uy
    Moore, Lucy
    Ferreira, Filipa
    Yonova, Ivelina
    Tzortziou Brown, Victoria
    de Lusignan, Simon
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [2] The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation
    Dawn Carnes
    Ratna Sohanpal
    Caroline Frostick
    Sally Hull
    Rohini Mathur
    Gopalakrishnan Netuveli
    Jin Tong
    Patrick Hutt
    Marcello Bertotti
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [3] The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation
    Carnes, Dawn
    Sohanpal, Ratna
    Frostick, Caroline
    Hull, Sally
    Mathur, Rohini
    Netuveli, Gopalakrishnan
    Tong, Jin
    Hutt, Patrick
    Bertotti, Marcello
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [4] Assessing care models implemented in primary healthcare for persons with dementia: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Vedel, Isabelle
    McAiney, Carrie
    Couturier, Yves
    Pakzad, Sarah
    Arsenault-Lapierre, Genevieve
    Godard-Sebillotte, Claire
    Sourial, Nadia
    Simmons, Rachel
    Bergman, Howard
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [5] Process evaluation in practice based research networks: a study protocol for a mixed-methods implementation study
    Sanftenberg, Linda
    Dreischulte, Tobias
    Haerdtlein, Annette
    Kosub, Helena
    Gagyor, Ildiko
    Kurotschka, Peter Konstantin
    Kuehlein, Thomas
    Burggraf, Larissa
    Eck, Stefanie
    Roos, Marco
    Gensichen, Jochen
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [6] Health and access to healthcare in homeless people Protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Bedmar, Miguel A.
    Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
    Artigas-Lelong, Berta
    Salva-Mut, Francesca
    Pou, Joan
    Capitan-Moyano, Laura
    Garcia-Toro, Mauro
    Yanez, Aina M.
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (07) : E28816
  • [7] Investigating healthcare workforce recruitment and retention: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Alkan, Erkan
    Cushen-Brewster, Noreen
    Anyanwu, Philip
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [8] Prescribing errors on admission to hospital and their potential impact: a mixed-methods study
    Basey, Avril Janette
    Krska, Janet
    Kennedy, Thomas Duncan
    Mackridge, Adam John
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [9] Evaluation of ethical reflections in community healthcare: A mixed-methods study
    Soderhamn, Ulrika
    Kjostvedt, Helga Tofte
    Slettebo, Ashild
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2015, 22 (02) : 194 - 204
  • [10] Implementation and evaluation of the WHO maternity care model: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol
    Abdolalipour, Somayeh
    Abbasalizadeh, Shamsi
    Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Sakineh
    Abbasalizadeh, Fatemeh
    Jahanfar, Shayesteh
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 5