Process evaluation in practice based research networks: a study protocol for a mixed-methods implementation study

被引:6
|
作者
Sanftenberg, Linda [1 ]
Dreischulte, Tobias [1 ]
Haerdtlein, Annette [1 ]
Kosub, Helena [1 ]
Gagyor, Ildiko [2 ]
Kurotschka, Peter Konstantin [2 ]
Kuehlein, Thomas [3 ]
Burggraf, Larissa [3 ]
Eck, Stefanie [4 ]
Roos, Marco [5 ]
Gensichen, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Inst Gen Practice & Family Med, Munich, Germany
[2] Julius Maximilians Univ Wuerzburg, Dept Gen Practice, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nuernberg FAU, Erlangen Univ Hosp, Inst Gen Practice, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Gen Practice & Hlth Serv Res, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Augsburg, Gen Practice, Augsburg, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine); Clinical Trial; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PRIMARY-CARE; PBRNS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065947
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction General practitioners often criticise clinical trials for their poor applicability in primary care, which may at least partially explain why their engagement in primary care research remains limited. In order to enhance primary care research, the German government has funded six regional practice based research networks (PBRNs). Within the Bavarian PBRN (BayFoNet), two cluster-randomised pilot trials will be conducted. This paper presents the protocol of the process evaluation accompanying both trials, which aims to explore relevance, feasibility, acceptability and credibility of clinical research in primary care from the perspectives of BayFoNet researchers, general practitioners, and patients.Methods and analysis The BayFoNet will be established by recruiting general practices (GPs) as prospective research collaborators in two cluster randomised pilot trials. Research teams will provide training in good clinical practice, and support practices in patient recruitment, data collection and documentation. Our process evaluation explores barriers and facilitators in the set up of the BayFoNet PBRN and both cluster randomised pilot trials, under the application of the consolidated framework for implementation research and the theoretical domains framework. In a mixed-methods concept, we will use qualitative and quantitative approaches to evaluate both pilot cluster-randomised trials as well as the BayFoNet itself: focus groups with researchers, semi-structured interviews with general practitioners and questionnaires for patients participating in the pilot cluster-randomised trials at three different time points.Ethics and dissemination Research ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (AZ 21-1135). Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the funders of the study as well as other PBRNs, GP teams and patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Mixed-Methods Study of Research Dissemination Across Practice-Based Research Networks
    Lipman, Paula Darby
    Lange, Carol J.
    Cohen, Rachel A.
    Peterson, Kevin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 37 (02): : 179 - 188
  • [2] Researching two Compassionate Cities: study protocol for a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation
    Quintiens, Bert
    Smets, Tinne
    Chambaere, Kenneth
    Van Den Block, Lieve
    Deliens, Luc
    Cohen, Joachim
    [J]. PALLIATIVE CARE & SOCIAL PRACTICE, 2022, 16
  • [3] Implementation and Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Telemonitoring Program for Patients With Heart Failure: Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Ware, Patrick
    Ross, Heather J.
    Cafazzo, Joseph A.
    Laporte, Audrey
    Seto, Emily
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (05):
  • [4] Multicountry research on comprehensive abortion policy implementation in Latin America: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Gialdini, Celina
    Michel, Agustina Ramon
    Romero, Mariana
    Ramos, Silvina
    Carroli, Guillermo
    Carroli, Berenise
    de Leon, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce
    Ortiz, Mercedes Vila
    Lavelanet, Antonella
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Implementation and evaluation of the WHO maternity care model: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol
    Abdolalipour, Somayeh
    Abbasalizadeh, Shamsi
    Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Sakineh
    Abbasalizadeh, Fatemeh
    Jahanfar, Shayesteh
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 5
  • [6] The stages of implementation completion for evidence-based practice: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Saldana, Lisa
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
  • [7] The stages of implementation completion for evidence-based practice: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Lisa Saldana
    [J]. Implementation Science, 9
  • [8] Evaluation of the Impact and Implementation of Social Prescribing in Primary Healthcare Units in Lisbon: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Hoffmeister, Louise Viecili
    Nunes, Mariana Fortuna
    Marta Figueiredo, Cristiano Emanuel
    Coelho, Andreia
    Fraga Oliveira, Mariana Filipa
    Massano, Paula
    Gama, Ana
    Aguiar, Pedro
    Dias, Sonia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2021, 21 (02):
  • [9] IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST PRACTICE GOAL-SETTING IN FIVE REHABILITATION SERVICES: A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION STUDY
    Baker, Amanda
    Rehab, Masters Comm
    Cornwell, Petrea
    Gustafsson, Louise
    Stewart, Claire
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55
  • [10] Factors influencing the implementation of the CombiConsultation in Dutch clinical practice: a mixed-methods study
    Meijvis, Valerie A. M.
    Heringa, Mette
    Kwint, Henk-Frans
    de Wit, Niek J.
    Bouvy, Marcel L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024,