Total efficient risk priority number (TERPN): a new method for risk assessment

被引:46
|
作者
Di Bona, Gianpaolo [1 ]
Silvestri, Alessandro [1 ]
Forcina, Antonio [2 ]
Petrillo, Antonella [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cassino & Southern Lazio, Dept Civil & Ind Engn, Cassino, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy
关键词
risk priority number; safety; FMECA; cost; prevention; protection; FAILURE MODE; PRIORITIZATION; FMECA;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2017.1307260
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Safety is one of the most important issues in modern industrial plants and industrial activities. The Safety Engineering role is to ensure acceptable safety levels of production systems, not only to respect local laws and regulations, but also to improve production efficiency and to reduce manufacturing costs. For these reasons, the choice of a proper model for risk assessment is crucial. In this context, the present research aims to propose a new method, called Total Efficient Risk Priority Number (TERPN), able to classify risks and identify corrective actions in order to obtain the highest risk reduction with the lowest cost. The main scope is to suggest a simple, but suitable model for ranking risks in a company, to reach the maximum effectiveness of prevention and protection strategies. The TERPN method is an integration of the popular Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) with other important factors in risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1384 / 1408
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Improved Risk Priority Number Method Based on AHP
    Zhao, Youhu
    Fu, Guicui
    Wan, Bo
    [J]. 59TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2013,
  • [2] Definition and analysis of a new risk priority number concept
    Braband, J
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 2006 - 2011
  • [3] New Means to Risk-Priority-Number for System Improvement
    Sorooshian, Shahryar
    [J]. QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2019, 20 (171): : 18 - 20
  • [4] Risk Priority Number for Bridge Failures
    Putcha, Chandrasekhar
    Dutta, Subhrajit
    Rodriguez, Jessica
    [J]. PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 25 (02)
  • [5] Risk Priority Number vs Action Priority in Electrical Systems
    Petrescu, Lucian
    Petrescu, Maria-Catalina
    Cazacu, Emil
    Ionita, Valentin
    [J]. 2021 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED TOPICS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ATEE), 2021,
  • [6] Fuzzy risk priority number assessment for solar gel battery manufacturing defects
    Yahmadi, Raja
    Brik, Kais
    ben Ammar, Faouzi
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2021, 124
  • [7] Improvement of the Risk Assessment System Based on the FMEA Action Priority Method
    Panyukov, D.I.
    Nenashev, M.V.
    Kozlovskii, V.N.
    Aidarov, D.V.
    [J]. Russian Engineering Research, 2024, 44 (07) : 1030 - 1034
  • [8] PRIORITY RANKING OF CHEMICALS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT
    ZITKO, V
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1990, 92 : 29 - 39
  • [9] Total safety and risk assessment: a new tool at Deltamarin
    不详
    [J]. NAVAL ARCHITECT, 2001, : 24 - 24
  • [10] A Novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set-Based Risk Priority Number Method for Solving Chemical Experiment Risk Evaluation
    Chung, Hsiang-Yu
    Ting, Tzu-Hao
    Chang, Kuei-Hu
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2024, 12 (05):