Diesel vs. gasoline emissions: Does PM from diesel or gasoline vehicles dominate in the US?

被引:49
|
作者
Gertler, AW [1 ]
机构
[1] Desert Res Inst, Div Atmospher Sci, Reno, NV 89512 USA
关键词
emissions inventory; receptor models; emission factors; particulate matter;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.065
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the US, the majority of the on-road fleet and vehicle miles travelled are attributed to light-duty vehicles, which are fuelled almost entirely by gasoline. However, due to their significantly higher PM emission rates, emissions inventories have tended to attribute the majority of the mobile source PM to contributions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles and strategies to reduce mobile source PM have focused on the contribution from this source. A limited number of source attribution studies have implied that PM emission inventories over-estimate the diesel contribution and emissions from gasoline vehicles may be greater than previously believed. Other receptor-modelling studies have found diesel vehicles to be the dominant source of motor vehicle PM. The former conclusion is supported by recent on-road PM emission rate results obtained in a highway tunnel and a series of crossroad experiments. This paper describes the often-conflicting results obtained from receptor modelling studies and emission inventories and uses on-road emission factor results to estimate the relative contributions from the diesel and gasoline sectors of the fleet. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2349 / 2355
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ft. McHenry tunnel study: Source profiles and mercury emissions from diesel and gasoline powered vehicles
    Landis, Matthew S.
    Lewis, Charles W.
    Stevens, Robert K.
    Keeler, Gerald J.
    Dvonch, J. Timothy
    Tremblay, Raphael T.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (38) : 8711 - 8724
  • [32] The Effects of Varying Altitudes on the Rates of Emissions from Diesel and Gasoline Vehicles Using a Portable Emission Measurement System
    Qi, Zhaoyu
    Gu, Ming
    Cao, Jianguo
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    You, Chuanzhou
    Zhan, Yue
    Ma, Zhongwu
    Huang, Wei
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (12)
  • [33] Assessing methods for comparing emissions from gasoline and diesel light-duty vehicles based on microscale measurements
    Coelho, Margarida C.
    Frey, H. Christopher
    Rouphail, Nagui M.
    Zhai, Haibo
    Pelkmans, Luc
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [34] CO EMISSION RATES FOR IN-USE GASOLINE AND DIESEL VEHICLES
    GORSE, RA
    NORBECK, JM
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1981, 31 (10): : 1094 - 1096
  • [35] HOW DO DIESEL AND GASOLINE-ENGINE EMISSIONS COMPARE
    不详
    AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING, 1977, 85 (11): : 50 - 55
  • [36] Fine particle emission from diesel and gasoline vehicles at constant and transient conditions
    Mohr, Martin
    Bach, Christian
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 1998, 29 (SUPPL.2)
  • [37] Exposure to diesel and gasoline engine emissions and the risk of lung cancer
    Parent, Marie-Elise
    Rousseau, Marie-Claude
    Boffetta, Paolo
    Cohen, Aaron
    Siemiatycki, Jack
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 165 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [38] Exhaust emissions from diesel, LPG, and gasoline low-power engines
    Murillo, S.
    Miguez, J. L.
    Porteiro, J.
    Lopez-Gonzalez, L. M.
    Granada, E.
    Moran, J. C.
    Paz, C.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2008, 30 (12) : 1065 - 1073
  • [39] Idle Emissions from Medium Heavy-Duty Diesel and Gasoline Trucks
    Khan, A. B. M. S.
    Clark, Nigel N.
    Gautam, Mridul
    Wayne, W. Scott
    Thompson, Gregory J.
    Lyons, Donald W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2009, 59 (03): : 354 - 359
  • [40] Organic chemical composition of PM2.5 in vehicular exhaust: Gasoline and diesel light duty vehicles
    Li, Min
    Tang, Shida
    Whitby, Robert
    Mazurek, Monica
    Belisle, Claire
    Ullah, Majad
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244