Preference-based English reverse auctions

被引:15
|
作者
Bellosta, Marie-Jo [1 ]
Kornman, Sylvie [1 ]
Vanderpooten, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Dauphine Lamsade, F-75775 Paris 16, France
关键词
Preference-based auctions; Multiple criteria decision analysis; Multi-attribute English reverse auctions; Non-transitive and partial preferences; Automated agents; MULTIATTRIBUTE; INTRANSITIVITY; AGGREGATION; NEGOTIATION; PROCUREMENT; UTILITY; AGENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.015
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper studies English reverse auctions within a unified framework for preference-based English reverse auctions. In this context, and particularly for electronic auctions, representing and handling the buyer's preferences, so as to enable him/her to obtain the best possible outcome, is a major issue. Existing auction mechanisms, which are based on single or multi-attribute utility functions, are only able to represent transitive and complete preferences. It is well known, however, in the preference modeling literature that more general preference structures, allowing intransitivity and incomparability, are more appropriate to capture preferences. On the other hand, we must also consider properties on the evolution and, above all, on the outcome of any auction executed by an auction mechanism. These properties, as well as properties of non-dominance and fair competition defined for multiple criteria auctions, impose restrictions on the preference relation. This leaves room for interesting preference models to be implemented within English reverse auction mechanisms. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1449 / 1467
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A PREFERENCE-BASED METHOD FOR FORECAST COMBINATION
    WALL, KD
    CORREIA, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1989, 8 (03) : 269 - 292
  • [32] The possibility of a preference-based power index
    Napel, S
    Widgrén, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 2005, 17 (03) : 377 - 387
  • [33] Refined Preference-based Argumentation Frameworks
    Kaci, Souhila
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2010, 2010, 216 : 299 - 310
  • [34] Design and implementation of preference-based search
    Viappiani, Paolo
    Faltings, Boi
    [J]. WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS - WISE 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4255 : 72 - 83
  • [35] The conceptual framework of preference-based design
    Ujigawa, M
    [J]. DESIGN OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS: SOCIAL AND ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS, 1997, 21 : 467 - 470
  • [36] Repairing Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
    Amgoud, Leila
    Vesic, Srdjan
    [J]. 21ST INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-09), PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 665 - 670
  • [37] Handling Inconsistency with Preference-Based Argumentation
    Amgoud, Leila
    Vesic, Srdjan
    [J]. SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, SUM 2010, 2010, 6379 : 56 - 69
  • [38] THE LIMITS OF PREFERENCE-BASED LEGAL POLICY
    HOVENKAMP, H
    [J]. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1994, 89 (01) : 4 - 91
  • [39] Preference-based hiring decisions and incentives
    Gioia, Francesca
    Immordino, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMIC SCIENCE ASSOCIATION-JESA, 2024, 10 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [40] Preference-based search with adaptive recommendations
    Viappiani, Paolo
    Pu, Pearl
    Faltings, Boi
    [J]. AI COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 21 (2-3) : 155 - 175