Measuring Hospital Performance in Congenital Heart Surgery: Administrative Versus Clinical Registry Data

被引:34
|
作者
Pasquali, Sara K.
He, Xia
Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
Jacobs, Marshall L.
Gaies, Michael G.
Shah, Samir S.
Hall, Matthew
Gaynor, J. William
Peterson, Eric D.
Mayer, John E.
Hirsch-Romano, Jennifer C.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Assoc, Overland Pk, KS USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Boston, MA USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Cardiac Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2015年 / 99卷 / 03期
关键词
PEDIATRIC CARDIAC-DISEASE; INDIRECT IDENTIFIERS; RISK ADJUSTMENT; DATABASES; OUTCOMES; IMPLEMENTATION; NOMENCLATURE; POPULATION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.069
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. In congenital heart surgery, hospital performance has historically been assessed using widely available administrative data sets. Recent studies have demonstrated inaccuracies in case ascertainment (coding and inclusion of eligible cases) in administrative versus clinical registry data; however, it is unclear whether this impacts assessment of performance on a hospital level. Methods. Merged data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database (clinical registry) and the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database (administrative data set) for 46,056 children undergoing cardiac operations (2006-2010) were used to evaluate in-hospital mortality for 33 hospitals based on their administrative versus registry data. Standard methods to identify/classify cases were used: Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 (RACHS-1) in the administrative data and STS-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (STAT) methodology in the registry. Results. Median hospital surgical volume based on the registry data was 269 cases per year; mortality was 2.9%. Hospital volumes and mortality rates based on the administrative data were on average 10.7% and 4.7% lower, respectively, although this varied widely across hospitals. Hospital rankings for mortality based on the administrative versus registry data differed by 5 or more rank positions for 24% of hospitals, with a change in mortality tertile classification (high, middle, or low mortality) for 18% and a change in statistical outlier classification for 12%. Higher volume/complexity hospitals were most impacted. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ) methods in the administrative data yielded similar results. Conclusions. Inaccuracies in case ascertainment in administrative versus clinical registry data can lead to important differences in assessment of hospital mortality rates for congenital heart surgery. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 938
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Congenital Heart Surgery: Expected Versus Observed Surgical Performance According to the Aristotle Complexity Score
    Photiadis, J.
    Sinzobahamvya, N.
    Arenz, C.
    Sata, S.
    Haun, C.
    Schindler, E.
    Asfour, B.
    Hraska, V.
    [J]. THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2011, 59 (05): : 268 - 273
  • [32] Cracking the Administrative Database Code to Risk Stratify Congenital Heart Disease Surgery
    Lopez, Keila N.
    Morris, Shaine A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (05) : 479 - 481
  • [33] Creating the BELgian COngenital heart disease database combining administrative and clinical data (BELCODAC): Rationale, design and methodology
    Ombelet, Fouke
    Goossens, Eva
    Willems, Ruben
    Annemans, Lieven
    Budts, Werner
    De Backer, Julie
    De Groote, Katya
    Moniotte, Stephane
    Van Bulck, Liesbet
    Marelli, Ariane
    Moons, Philip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 316 : 72 - 78
  • [34] Mortality after non-cardiac surgery: Prediction from administrative versus clinical data.
    Geraci, JM
    Johnson, ML
    Gordon, HS
    Petersen, NJ
    Daley, J
    Hur, K
    Henderson, WG
    Khurl, SF
    Wray, NP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 : 116 - 116
  • [35] A COMPARISON OF ADMINISTRATIVE VERSUS CLINICAL-DATA - CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY AS AN EXAMPLE
    ROMANO, PS
    ROOS, LL
    LUFT, HS
    JOLLIS, JG
    DOLISZNY, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (03) : 249 - 260
  • [36] The California Hospital Outcomes Project: Using administrative data to compare hospital performance
    Romano, PS
    Zach, A
    Luft, HS
    Rainwater, J
    Remy, LL
    Campa, D
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1995, 21 (12): : 668 - 682
  • [37] Congenital Heart Surgery Outcomes Looking Beyond the Hospital Walls
    Mery, Carlos M.
    Well, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (09) : 814 - 816
  • [38] Feasibility of using administrative data to compare hospital performance in the EU
    Groene, O.
    Kristensen, S.
    Arah, O. A.
    Thompson, C. A.
    Bartels, P.
    Sunol, R.
    Klazinga, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 : 108 - 115
  • [39] Accuracy of administrative and clinical registry data in reporting postoperative complications after surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
    Awad, Mahmoud I.
    Shuman, Andrew G.
    Montero, Pablo H.
    Palmer, Frank L.
    Shah, Jatin P.
    Patel, Snehal G.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (06): : 851 - 861
  • [40] DATA-COLLECTION FOR CONGENITAL HEART-SURGERY
    WRIGHT, JS
    BEVERIDGE, J
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN PAEDIATRIC JOURNAL, 1980, 16 (02): : 130 - 130