Measuring Hospital Performance in Congenital Heart Surgery: Administrative Versus Clinical Registry Data

被引:34
|
作者
Pasquali, Sara K.
He, Xia
Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
Jacobs, Marshall L.
Gaies, Michael G.
Shah, Samir S.
Hall, Matthew
Gaynor, J. William
Peterson, Eric D.
Mayer, John E.
Hirsch-Romano, Jennifer C.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Assoc, Overland Pk, KS USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Boston, MA USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Cardiac Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2015年 / 99卷 / 03期
关键词
PEDIATRIC CARDIAC-DISEASE; INDIRECT IDENTIFIERS; RISK ADJUSTMENT; DATABASES; OUTCOMES; IMPLEMENTATION; NOMENCLATURE; POPULATION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.069
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. In congenital heart surgery, hospital performance has historically been assessed using widely available administrative data sets. Recent studies have demonstrated inaccuracies in case ascertainment (coding and inclusion of eligible cases) in administrative versus clinical registry data; however, it is unclear whether this impacts assessment of performance on a hospital level. Methods. Merged data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database (clinical registry) and the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database (administrative data set) for 46,056 children undergoing cardiac operations (2006-2010) were used to evaluate in-hospital mortality for 33 hospitals based on their administrative versus registry data. Standard methods to identify/classify cases were used: Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 (RACHS-1) in the administrative data and STS-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (STAT) methodology in the registry. Results. Median hospital surgical volume based on the registry data was 269 cases per year; mortality was 2.9%. Hospital volumes and mortality rates based on the administrative data were on average 10.7% and 4.7% lower, respectively, although this varied widely across hospitals. Hospital rankings for mortality based on the administrative versus registry data differed by 5 or more rank positions for 24% of hospitals, with a change in mortality tertile classification (high, middle, or low mortality) for 18% and a change in statistical outlier classification for 12%. Higher volume/complexity hospitals were most impacted. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ) methods in the administrative data yielded similar results. Conclusions. Inaccuracies in case ascertainment in administrative versus clinical registry data can lead to important differences in assessment of hospital mortality rates for congenital heart surgery. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 938
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Linking clinical registry data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: Implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population
    Pasquali, Sara K.
    Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
    Shook, Gregory J.
    O'Brien, Sean M.
    Hall, Matthew
    Jacobs, Marshall L.
    Welke, Karl F.
    Gaynor, J. William
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Shah, Samir S.
    Li, Jennifer S.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 160 (06) : 1099 - 1104
  • [2] Measuring Surgical Quality: a National Clinical Registry Versus Administrative Claims Data
    Enomoto, Laura M.
    Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
    Bhayani, Neil H.
    Dillon, Peter W.
    Gusani, Niraj J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (08) : 1416 - 1422
  • [3] Measuring Surgical Quality: a National Clinical Registry Versus Administrative Claims Data
    Laura M. Enomoto
    Christopher S. Hollenbeak
    Neil H. Bhayani
    Peter W. Dillon
    Niraj J. Gusani
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2014, 18 : 1416 - 1422
  • [4] The Impact of Differential Case Ascertainment in Clinical Registry Versus Administrative Data on Assessment of Resource Utilization in Pediatric Heart Surgery
    Jantzen, David W.
    He, Xia
    Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
    Jacobs, Marshall L.
    Gaies, Michael G.
    Hall, Matt
    Mayer, John E.
    Shah, Samir S.
    Hirsch-Romano, Jennifer
    Gaynor, J. William
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Pasquali, Sara K.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL FOR PEDIATRIC AND CONGENITAL HEART SURGERY, 2014, 5 (03) : 398 - 405
  • [5] Adjusting for Congenital Heart Surgery Risk Using Administrative Data
    Jayaram, Natalie
    Allen, Philip
    Hall, Matthew
    Karamlou, Tara
    Woo, Joyce
    Crook, Sarah
    Anderson, Brett R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (23) : 2212 - 2221
  • [6] Measuring clinical performance: Comparison and validity of telephone survey and administrative data
    Thompson, BL
    O'Connor, P
    Boyle, R
    Hindmarsh, M
    Salem, N
    Simmons, KW
    Wagner, E
    Oswald, J
    Smith, SM
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2001, 36 (04) : 813 - 825
  • [7] RISK-ADJUSTED HOSPITAL RATES OF READMISSION AND MORTALITY USING COMORBIDITY DATA FROM A CLINICAL REGISTRY VERSUS ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS
    O'Brien, E.
    Li, S.
    Thomas, L.
    Wang, T. Y.
    Rowe, M. T.
    Peterson, E. D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A102 - A102
  • [8] Mortality after noncardiac surgery - Prediction from administrative versus clinical data
    Gordon, HS
    Johnson, ML
    Wray, NP
    Petersen, NJ
    Henderson, WG
    Khuri, SF
    Geraci, JM
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [9] CLINICAL VERSUS ADMINISTRATIVE DATA-BASES FOR CABG SURGERY - DOES IT MATTER
    HANNAN, EL
    KILBURN, H
    LINDSEY, ML
    LEWIS, R
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (10) : 892 - 907
  • [10] Measuring contract agency performance with administrative data
    Wulczyn, F
    Orlebeke, B
    Melamid, E
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2000, 79 (05) : 457 - 474