Long Prairie River watershed TMDL project - Lessons learned from phase I

被引:0
|
作者
Munir, HM [1 ]
Sinokrot, B [1 ]
Ford, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] Minnesota Pollut Control Agcy, St Paul, MN 55155 USA
关键词
TMDL; Long Prairie River; model; monitoring; DO; Minnesota;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Long Prairie River drains a predominantly agricultural watershed in central Minnesota. Designated uses of the River are aquatic life, recreation, industrial consumption, agriculture, wildlife, aesthetic enjoyment, and navigation. Monitoring in recent years has shown dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in portions of the river intermittently below the state water quality standard of 5 mg/L. As a result, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) placed four lower-river reach segments on the agency's 1998 "303(d) list". The main objectives of the project are to define the extent, persistence, and severity of the DO depletion problem, quantify point and non-point pollutant sources contributions to water quality impairments, and develop a TMDL for the watershed. The TMDL project has three phases. Phase I is an analysis of existing monitoring data to: determine the technical issues to be addressed within the scope of the project, outline a modeling strategy, define data gaps and additional monitoring needs, and prepare a monitoring plan to address the additional data needs. Review of the existing water quality data for the Long Prairie River indicates substantial seasonal and inter-annual variability but no significant long-term trends. Longitudinal total phosphorus profiles show a consistent pattern of gradual increase from the headwaters to the City of Long Prairie, followed by a steep increase downstream from the City. Longitudinal nitrogen series profiles indirectly suggest significant nitrification in the reach between the cities of Long Prairie and Browerville. Diurnal DO variations in the vicinity of City of Long Prairie indicate substantial primary productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LESSONS LEARNED FROM A WANT BASED NPD PROJECT
    Bjoerk, E.
    Ottosson, S.
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, (48): : 115 - +
  • [42] Lessons learned from the Uniontown Community Health Project
    Littleton, MA
    Cornell, CE
    Dignan, M
    Brownstein, N
    Raczynski, JM
    Stalker, V
    McDuffie, K
    Greene, PG
    Sanderson, B
    Streumpler, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2002, 26 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [43] LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE OS/400 OO PROJECT
    BERG, W
    CLINE, M
    GIROU, M
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1995, 38 (10) : 54 - 64
  • [44] Lessons learned from the implementation of a Malaysian eGovernment project
    McPherson, M
    Ramli, R
    [J]. INNOVATIONS THROUGH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 709 - 712
  • [45] Lessons Learned from a Scientific Software Development Project
    Morris, Chris
    Segal, Judith
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2012, 29 (04) : 9 - 12
  • [46] Installing I/A systems in a community for the first time - Lessons learned from Gloucester, MA project
    Jantrania, AR
    Robertson, WM
    Katz, EF
    [J]. ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL COMMUNITY SEWAGE SYSTEMS, 1998, : 490 - 499
  • [47] COST-EFFECTIVE PLACEMENT OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN A WATERSHED: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT
    Kurkalova, Lyubov A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2015, 51 (02): : 359 - 372
  • [49] Conservation Action Planning: Lessons learned from the St. Marys River watershed biodiversity conservation planning process
    Patterson, Tamatha A.
    Grundel, Ralph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2014, 40 : 7 - 14
  • [50] Lessons I learned from a can of beans
    Parton, S
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2005, 81 (02): : 179 - 179