Temperature-pressure conditions in coalbed methane reservoirs of the Black Warrior basin: implications for carbon sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane recovery

被引:83
|
作者
Pashin, JC
McIntyre, MR
机构
[1] Geol Survey Alabama, University, AL 35486 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Geol Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
coalbed methane; carbon sequestration; hydrology; geothermics; reservoir pressure; supercritical CO2;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-5162(03)00034-X
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Sorption of gas onto coal is sensitive to pressure and temperature, and carbon dioxide can be a potentially volatile supercritical fluid in coalbed methane reservoirs. More than 5000 wells have been drilled in the coalbed methane fields of the Black Warrior basin in west-central Alabama, and the hydrologic and geothermic information from geophysical well logs provides a robust database that can be used to assess the potential for carbon sequestration in coal-bearing strata. Reservoir temperature within the coalbed methane target zone generally ranges from 80 to 125 degreesF (27-52 degreesC), and geothermal gradient ranges from 6.0 to 19.9 degreesF/1000 ft (10.9-36.2 degreesC/km). Geothermal gradient data have a strong central tendency about a mean of 9.0 degreesF/1000 ft (16.4 degreesC/km). Hydrostatic pressure gradients in the coalbed methane fields range from normal (0.43 psi/ft) to extremely underpressured (<0.05 psi/ft). Pressure-depth plots establish a bimodal regime in which 70% of the wells have pressure gradients greater than 0.30 psi/ft, and 20% have pressure gradients lower than 0.10 psi/ft. Pockets of underpressure are developed around deep longwall coal mines and in areas distal to the main hydrologic recharge zone, which is developed in structurally upturned strata along the southeastern margin of the basin. Geothermal gradients within the coalbed methane fields are high enough that reservoirs never cross the gas-liquid condensation line for carbon dioxide. However, reservoirs have potential for supercritical fluid conditions beyond a depth of 2480 ft (756 m) under normally pressured conditions. All target coal beds are subcritically pressured in the northeastern half of the coalbed methane exploration fairway, whereas those same beds were in the supercritical phase window prior to gas production in the southwestern half of the fairway. Although mature reservoirs are dewatered and thus are in the carbon dioxide gas window, supercritical conditions may develop as reservoirs equilibrate toward a normal hydrostatic pressure gradient after abandonment. Coal can hold large quantities of carbon dioxide under supercritical conditions, and supercritical isotherms indicate non-Langmiur conditions under which some carbon dioxide may remain mobile in coal or may react with formation fluids or minerals. Hence, carbon sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane recovery show great promise in subcritical reservoirs, and additional research is required to assess the behavior of carbon dioxide in coal under supercritical conditions where additional sequestration capacity may exist. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 183
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicted CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in China
    Yu, Hongguan
    Zhou, Guangzhu
    Fan, Weitang
    Ye, Hanping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2007, 71 (2-3) : 345 - 357
  • [42] Experimental study of enhancing coalbed methane recovery by carbon dioxide injection driving methane
    LUO DaochengLIU Junfeng School of Chemistry and TechnologyHunan University of Science and TechnologyXiangtan China
    [J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China)., 2010, 16 (04) - 361
  • [43] Extension of the Parana Basin to offshore Brazil: Implications for coalbed methane evaluation
    Holz, Michael
    Kalkreuth, Wolfgang
    Alves Rolim, Silvia Beatriz
    [J]. MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2010, 27 (05) : 1119 - 1132
  • [44] Implications of the pore pressure and in situ stress for the coalbed methane exploration in the southern Junggar Basin, China
    Li, Guoqing
    Yan, Detian
    Zhuang, Xinguo
    Zhang, Zheng
    Fu, Haijiao
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2019, 262
  • [45] Laboratory and simulation investigation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery by gas injection
    Jessen, Kristian
    Tang, Guo-Qing
    Kovscek, Anthony R.
    [J]. TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2008, 73 (02) : 141 - 159
  • [46] Numerical study of CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery
    Fan, Yongpeng
    Deng, Cunbao
    Zhang, Xun
    Li, Fengqi
    Wang, Xinyang
    Qiao, Ling
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 76 : 12 - 23
  • [47] Enhanced coalbed-methane recovery by use of CO2
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 51 (10): : 62 - 62
  • [48] Mechanisms in CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery process
    Asif, Mohammad
    Wang, Lei
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, Heng
    Hazlett, Randy D.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (06): : 531 - 534
  • [49] Feasibility study of gas mixture enhanced coalbed methane recovery technology
    Fang Zhi-ming
    Li Xiao-chun
    Li Hong
    Chen Han-qiu
    [J]. ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2010, 31 (10) : 3223 - 3229
  • [50] Laboratory and Simulation Investigation of Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery by Gas Injection
    Kristian Jessen
    Guo-Qing Tang
    Anthony R. Kovscek
    [J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2008, 73 : 141 - 159