Trend of technology innovation in China's coal-fired electricity industry under resource and environmental constraints

被引:69
|
作者
Yu, Fanxian [1 ]
Chen, Jining [1 ]
Sun, Fu [1 ]
Zeng, Siyu [1 ]
Wang, Can [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Technology innovation; Resource consumption; Environmental emissions; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; ENERGY; EMISSIONS; REDUCTION; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research builds a technology-based bottom-up model to estimate the performance of China's coal-fired electricity industry on resource consumption and environmental emissions. From the integrated estimation of three scenarios characterizing different stages of technology innovation in 2007-2030, technology innovation is proven to be the determinant in decreasing resource use and environmental effects from electricity production, but analysis based on current policies reveals some doubt in achieving the coal consumption intensity control target. Constrained with national control targets, the best route of technology innovation is calculated by integrated benefit targeting optimization. Supercritical (SC) and ultra-supercritical (USC) pressure boilers, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) and closed-cycle wet cooling with a high circulation ratio will be the mainstream technologies before 2030 based on current policy. It is inevitable to close or reconstruct small power plants from the late 2010s, and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and pressurized fluidized bed combustion combined cycle (PFBC-CC) plants will show a competitive advantage in the late 2020s. However, air cooling and FGD systems will expand slower than the authorities' expectation, while higher water prices and 502 charges promote the expansion. Stricter restrictions are also found to be positive for technological progress. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1586 / 1599
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abatement technology investment and emissions trading system: a case of coal-fired power industry of Shenzhen, China
    Huang, Ying
    Liu, Lei
    Ma, Xiaoming
    Pan, Xiaofeng
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 17 (03) : 811 - 817
  • [22] Eliminating Outdated Capacity to Promote Energy Conservation in China's Coal-Fired Power Industry
    Wang, Weiliang
    Li, Zheng
    Lyu, Junfu
    Ni, Weidou
    ENGINEERING, 2019, 5 (02) : 194 - 196
  • [23] Environmental Benefits of Stock Evolution of Coal-Fired Power Generators in China
    Li, Fangyi
    Ye, Zhaoyang
    Xiao, Xilin
    Ma, Dawei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [24] Cost analysis of environmental protection price of coal-fired plants in China
    Yi Zhao
    Jingjie Zhang
    Zhixuan Wang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 18729 - 18742
  • [25] Cost analysis of environmental protection price of coal-fired plants in China
    Zhao, Yi
    Zhang, Jingjie
    Wang, Zhixuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (15) : 18729 - 18742
  • [26] An integrated analysis of prospects for advanced coal-fired power technology in China
    Li, Aijun
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 5 (03): : 420 - 426
  • [27] Valuation of Environmental Externalities in China's Coal-fired Power Generation: A Latent Class Approach
    Cai, Qiong
    Zhao, Xiaoli
    Hu, Yanan
    Luo, Kaiyan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (SEEE 2015), 2015, 14 : 57 - 61
  • [28] China's largest coal-fired power plant operational
    不详
    E&MJ-ENGINEERING AND MINING JOURNAL, 2008, 209 (01): : 22 - 22
  • [29] Combustion in Circulating Fluidized Bed: Competitive Technology for the Coal-Fired Power Industry
    Salomatov, V. V.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING THERMOPHYSICS, 2019, 28 (02) : 199 - 210
  • [30] Combustion in Circulating Fluidized Bed: Competitive Technology for the Coal-Fired Power Industry
    V. V. Salomatov
    Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 28 : 199 - 210