Inspiration-induced vasoconstrictive responses in dominant versus non-dominant hands

被引:3
|
作者
Mayrovitz, HN [1 ]
Groseclose, EE [1 ]
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Coll Med Sci, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33328 USA
关键词
finger; hand; inspiratory gasp; laser Doppler; microcirculation; reflexes neurovascular; skin blood flow; vascular control;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-097X.2004.00592.x
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Single rapid and deep inspirations (inspiratory gasps, IG) result in arteriolar vasoconstriction with concomitant transient decreases in skin blood flow that are most prominent in fingers and toes. Vascular responses (inspiratory gasp responses, IGR) are determined as the maximum percentage reduction in blood flow and have been used to assess sympathetic neurovascular function in several conditions. Previous studies have described various features of the response but there has been no reported systematic investigation of the degree of similarity between IGR obtained on dominant and non-dominant hands. This aspect is important in procedures that may use IGR to evaluate suspected unilateral sympathetic dysfunction of a limb-pair or to test the effectiveness of physiological interventions imposed on a single limb of a pair. Thus, the goal of our study was to compare IGR magnitudes that were simultaneously determined in paired-fingers of dominant and non-dominant hands. In 30 healthy seated subjects, skin blood perfusion via laser-Doppler (SBF) was measured on the dorsum of the middle finger of both hands while subjects performed three sequential IG at 3-min intervals. Analysis of variance for repeated measures revealed no significant difference in IGR between dominant (79.3 +/- 11.2%) and non-dominant hands (81.9 +/- 11.6%, P = 0.965) with an overall IGR of 80.6 +/- 11.4%. These results indicate that hand-dominance is not a factor that is likely to significantly effect IGR differentials determined in paired-limbs.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Writing letter fluency with dominant and non-dominant hand by NIRS
    Onoue, Sachi
    Kangori, Yui
    Seya, Yusuke
    Shoji, Hiroaki
    Ozaki, Hisaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 94 (02) : 207 - 208
  • [42] Developmental differences in drawing performance of the dominant and non-dominant hand
    van Mier, Hanneke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 716 - 716
  • [43] Dominant and Non-Dominant Structure of Ventricular Fibrillation in Canine Heart
    M. I. Guryanov
    Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2016, 160 : 291 - 294
  • [44] Speaking as female and white: A non-dominant/dominant group standpoint
    Calvert, LM
    Ramsey, VJ
    ORGANIZATION, 1996, 3 (04) : 468 - 485
  • [45] Different Neuromuscular Control Strategies In Dominant And Non-dominant Handwriting
    Liu, Bowen
    Kaneko, Naotsugu
    Takahashi, Ryogo
    Jeong, Inhyeok
    Nakazawa, Kimitaka
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2024, 56 (10) : 250 - 250
  • [46] Dominant and Non-Dominant Structure of Ventricular Fibrillation in Canine Heart
    Guryanov, M. I.
    BULLETIN OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2016, 160 (03) : 291 - 294
  • [47] The morphological classification of heartbeats as dominant and non-dominant in ECG signals
    Chiarugi, Franco
    Emmanouilidou, Dimitra
    Tsamardinos, Ioannis
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 31 (05) : 611 - 631
  • [48] Induction of plasticity in the dominant and non-dominant motor cortices of humans
    Ridding, M. C.
    Flavel, S. C.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 171 (04) : 551 - 557
  • [49] Role Analysis of Dominant and Non-dominant Hand in Daily Life
    Kousaka, Hiroshi
    Mizoguchi, Hiroshi
    Yoshikawa, Masahiro
    Tanaka, Hideyuki
    Matsumoto, Yoshio
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2013), 2013, : 3972 - 3977
  • [50] Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye
    Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam
    Colm McAlinden
    Abbas Azimi
    Mina Sobhani
    Eirini Skiadaresi
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2014, 252 : 509 - 514