Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Liver Donors on Postoperative Liver Function in Donors and Recipients Following Liver Transplantation A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:44
|
作者
Jung, Kyeo-Woon [1 ]
Kang, Jiwon [1 ]
Kwon, Hye-Mee [1 ]
Moon, Young-Jin [1 ]
Jun, In-Gu [1 ]
Song, Jun-Gol [1 ]
Hwang, Gyu-Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Lab Cardiovasc Dynam, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ischemia reperfusion injury; liver transplantation; remote ischemic preconditioning; REPERFUSION INJURY; CARDIAC-SURGERY; KIDNEY INJURY; COMPLICATIONS; REGENERATION; HEPATECTOMY; MECHANISMS; PROTOCOLS; DECREASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003498
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on liver function in donors and recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Background: Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to be associated with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. RIPC is used to lessen the harmful effects of IRI. Methods: A total of 148 donors were randomly assigned to RIPC (n = 75) and control (n = 73) groups. RIPC involves 3 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg to the upper arm, followed by 5-minute reperfusion with cuff deflation. The primary aim was to assess postoperative liver function in donors and recipients and the incidence of early allograft dysfunction and graft failure in recipients. Results: RIPC was not associated with any differences in postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase levels after living donor hepatectomy, and it did not decrease the incidence of delayed graft hepatic function (6.7% vs 0.0%,P= 0.074) in donors. AST level on postoperative day 1 [217.0 (158.0, 288.0) vs 259.5 (182.0, 340.0),P= 0.033] and maximal AST level within 7 postoperative days [244.0 (167.0, 334.0) vs 296.0 (206.0, 395.5),P= 0.029) were significantly lower in recipients who received a preconditioned graft. No differences were found in the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (4.1% vs 5.6%,P= 0.955) or graft failure (1.4% vs 5.6%,P= 0.346) among recipients. Conclusions: RIPC did not improve liver function in living donor hepatectomy. However, RIPC performed in liver donors may be beneficial for postoperative liver function in recipients after living donor liver transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING OF THE LIVER IN DECEASED DONORS - SUGGESTIVE EVIDENCE OF REMOTE PRECONDITIONING IN KIDNEY ALLOGRAFTS
    Desai, Kunj K.
    Shareef, Asif
    Raza, Ali
    Mulgaonkar, Shamkant
    Laskow, David
    Osband, Adena
    Shapiro, Michael
    Radomski, John
    Guy, Stephen
    Goldblatt, Melvin
    Dikdan, George
    Koneru, Baburao
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (07) : S101 - S101
  • [22] Domino liver transplantation in living donors
    Hashikura, Y
    Ikegami, T
    Nakazawa, Y
    Urata, K
    Mihara, M
    Mita, A
    Sakon, M
    Miyagawa, S
    Ikeda, S
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) : 1076 - 1078
  • [23] Analysis of postoperative liver function of donors in living-related liver transplantation - Comparison of the type of donor hepatectomy
    Tojimbara, T
    Fuchinoue, S
    Nakajima, I
    Koike, T
    Abe, M
    Tsugita, T
    Otsubo, T
    Tanaka, K
    Agishi, T
    Takasaki, K
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (08) : 1035 - 1039
  • [24] Domino liver transplantation: Evaluation of postoperative outcomes for donors and recipients.
    Bittencourt, PL
    Raia, S
    Mc Leitao, R
    Baia, CS
    Fernandes, AO
    Lalle, M
    Massarollo, PC
    Mies, S
    HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 30 (04) : 185A - 185A
  • [25] The quality of life of donors following living donor liver transplantation
    El Missiry, A.
    Hashem, R. E.
    Khalil, A. H.
    Omar, A. M.
    El-Meteini, M. S.
    El-Ela, E. I. Abo
    Hamed, M. A.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 23 : S624 - S625
  • [26] Quality of life of donors following living donation liver transplantation
    Beavers, KL
    Fair, JH
    Shrestha, R
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 34 : 28 - 28
  • [27] Complications and treatments of donors and recipients in living-related liver transplantation
    Ohkohchi, N
    Katoh, H
    Orii, T
    Fujimori, K
    Shimaoka, S
    Satomi, S
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (07) : 3218 - 3220
  • [28] Liver Transplantation: Recipients' Evaluation of Life From the Perspective of Living Donors
    Tankurt, A.
    Boothby, M. R. Krespi
    Acarli, K.
    Kalayoglu, M.
    Kanmaz, T.
    Yankol, Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2016, 48 (01) : 107 - 110
  • [29] Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation
    Ordin, Yaprak Sarigol
    Seren, Arzu Kader Harmanci
    Karayurt, Ozgul
    Kul, Gulay Aksu
    Kilic, Murat
    Bozoklar, Cemal Ata
    Tokat, Yaman
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 33 (04): : 346 - 355
  • [30] Old Donors for Old Recipients in Liver Transplantation
    Valdivieso, Andres
    Gastaca, Mikel
    Bustamante, Javier
    Gonzalez, Javier
    Ignacio Pijoan, Jose
    Ruiz, Patricia
    Ventoso, Alberto
    Ramon Fernandez, Jose
    Testillano, Milagros
    Matarranz, Amaya
    Montejo, Miguel
    Jesus Suarez, Maria
    Ortiz de Urbina, Jorge
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 17 (06) : S167 - S167