Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Liver Donors on Postoperative Liver Function in Donors and Recipients Following Liver Transplantation A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:44
|
作者
Jung, Kyeo-Woon [1 ]
Kang, Jiwon [1 ]
Kwon, Hye-Mee [1 ]
Moon, Young-Jin [1 ]
Jun, In-Gu [1 ]
Song, Jun-Gol [1 ]
Hwang, Gyu-Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Lab Cardiovasc Dynam, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ischemia reperfusion injury; liver transplantation; remote ischemic preconditioning; REPERFUSION INJURY; CARDIAC-SURGERY; KIDNEY INJURY; COMPLICATIONS; REGENERATION; HEPATECTOMY; MECHANISMS; PROTOCOLS; DECREASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003498
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on liver function in donors and recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Background: Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to be associated with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. RIPC is used to lessen the harmful effects of IRI. Methods: A total of 148 donors were randomly assigned to RIPC (n = 75) and control (n = 73) groups. RIPC involves 3 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg to the upper arm, followed by 5-minute reperfusion with cuff deflation. The primary aim was to assess postoperative liver function in donors and recipients and the incidence of early allograft dysfunction and graft failure in recipients. Results: RIPC was not associated with any differences in postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase levels after living donor hepatectomy, and it did not decrease the incidence of delayed graft hepatic function (6.7% vs 0.0%,P= 0.074) in donors. AST level on postoperative day 1 [217.0 (158.0, 288.0) vs 259.5 (182.0, 340.0),P= 0.033] and maximal AST level within 7 postoperative days [244.0 (167.0, 334.0) vs 296.0 (206.0, 395.5),P= 0.029) were significantly lower in recipients who received a preconditioned graft. No differences were found in the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (4.1% vs 5.6%,P= 0.955) or graft failure (1.4% vs 5.6%,P= 0.346) among recipients. Conclusions: RIPC did not improve liver function in living donor hepatectomy. However, RIPC performed in liver donors may be beneficial for postoperative liver function in recipients after living donor liver transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response to the Comment on "Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Liver Donors on Postoperative Liver Function in Donors and Recipients Following Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial''
    Jung, Kyeo-Woon
    Song, Jun-Gol
    Hwang, Gyu-Sam
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (06) : E710 - E711
  • [2] Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning among donors and recipients following pediatric liver transplantation: A randomized clinical trial
    Bo Qi
    Xiao-Qiang Wang
    Shu-Ting Pan
    Pei-Ying Li
    Ling-Ke Chen
    Qiang Xia
    Li-Qun Yang
    Wei-Feng Yu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021, 27 (04) : 345 - 357
  • [3] Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning among donors and recipients following pediatric liver transplantation: A randomized clinical trial
    Qi, Bo
    Wang, Xiao-Qiang
    Pan, Shu-Ting
    Li, Pei-Ying
    Chen, Ling-Ke
    Xia, Qiang
    Yang, Li-Qun
    Yu, Wei-Feng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (04)
  • [4] Impact of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Kidney Donors on Renal Function in Donors and Recipients Following Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bang, Ji-Yeon
    Kim, Sae-Gyeol
    Oh, Jimi
    Kim, Seon-Ok
    Go, Yon-Ji
    Hwang, Gyu-Sam
    Song, Jun-Gol
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05)
  • [5] Quantitative liver function tests in donors and recipients of living donor liver transplantation
    Jochum, C
    Beste, M
    Penndorf, V
    Farahani, MS
    Testa, G
    Nadalin, S
    Malago, M
    Broeisch, CE
    Gerken, G
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 12 (04) : 544 - 549
  • [6] Outcomes of donors and recipients following living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure
    Trotter, James F.
    Blei, Andres T.
    Everhart, James E.
    Lok, Anna S.
    Wisniewski, Karen A.
    Freise, Chris E.
    Saab, Sammy
    Campsen, P. Jeffrey
    HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 44 (04) : 362A - 362A
  • [7] Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors
    Karakayali, H.
    Pehlivan, S.
    Yagmurdur, M. C.
    Savas, N.
    Coskun, M.
    Tarhan, C.
    Haberal, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (07) : 2855 - 2859
  • [8] Selection of donors and recipients for living donor liver transplantation
    Trotter, JF
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 6 (06) : S52 - S58
  • [9] Evaluation of Liver Function Tests for Living Liver Donors in Postoperative Course
    Aydin, Cemalettin
    Akbulut, Sami
    Otan, Emrah
    Karakas, Serdar
    Dirican, Abuzer
    Kayaalp, Cuneyt
    Colak, Cemil
    Yilmaz, Sezai
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 : 281 - 281
  • [10] Assessment of liver regeneration and liver function in donors and recipients following adult to adult living donor liver transplant
    Nakatsuka, M
    Marcos, A
    Ham, J
    Fisher, R
    Posner, M
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U155 - U155