A Novel Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Platform (Noona) for Clinical Use in Patients With Cancer: Pilot Study Assessing Suitability

被引:5
|
作者
Peltola, Maria Kristiina [1 ]
Poikonen-Saksela, Paula [1 ]
Mattson, Johanna [1 ]
Parkkari, Timo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Univ Hosp, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Paciuksenkatu 3, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[2] Clinius Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
electronic patient-reported outcome; adverse events; patients with cancer;
D O I
10.2196/16156
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As the incidence of cancer is on the rise, there is a need to develop modern communication tools between patients and the medical personnel. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) measures increase the safety of cancer treatments and may have an impact on treatment outcome as well. ePRO may also provide a cost-efficient way to organize follow-up for patients with cancer. Noona is an internet-based system for patients to self-report symptoms and adverse events of cancer treatments from home via a computer or a smart device (eg, smartphone, tablet). Objective: In this pilot study, we assessed the suitability of a novel ePRO application (Noona) for patients with cancer, nurses, and doctors at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Methods: The study included 44 patients with cancer (different solid tumor types) and 17 health care professionals (nurses or medical doctors). Patients were either operated or received systemic treatment or radiotherapy. Patients reported their symptoms to the medical staff via Noona. In addition, patients and clinicians answered a questionnaire, based on which Noona's suitability for clinical use was evaluated in terms of usability (ease of use, operability, and learnability), reliability (subjective opinion of the participant), and incidence of harmful events reported by the participants. Results: A total of 41/44 (93%) patients and 15/17 (88%) professionals reported that the program was easy or quite easy to use; 38/44 (86%) patients and 11/17 (65%) professionals found Noona reliable, and 38/44 (86%) patients and 10/17 (59%) professionals would recommend Noona to other patients or their colleagues. No harmful incidences caused by the use of Noona were reported by the patients; however, 1 harmful incidence was reported by one of the professionals. Conclusions: The majority of the participants felt that Noona appeared reliable and it was easy to use. Noona seems to be a useful tool for monitoring patient's symptoms during cancer therapy. Future studies will determine the impact of this ePRO platform in routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical diabetes consultations: the DiaPROM randomised controlled pilot trial
    Hernar, Ingvild
    Graue, Marit
    Richards, David A.
    Strandberg, Ragnhild B.
    Nilsen, Roy Miodini
    Rekdal, Magne
    Lovaas, Karianne Fjeld
    Madsen, Tone, V
    Tell, Grethe S.
    Haugstvedt, Anne
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [42] STRUCTURED REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME INSTRUMENTS FOR ASSESSING PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Barrett, A. M.
    DiBenedetti, D. B.
    Phatak, H.
    Iloeje, U. H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A293 - A293
  • [43] Use of a novel healthtech platform to record patient-reported needs in real time
    Cornish, Katherine
    Murray, Mary Stober
    Karmo, Maimah
    Regnante, Jeanne
    Leach, Virginia
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (12)
  • [44] Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study
    Philpot, Lindsey M.
    Barnes, Sunni A.
    Brown, Rachel M.
    Austin, Jessica A.
    James, Cameron S.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    Ebbert, Jon O.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2018, 33 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [45] HM-PRO: A Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Hematological Malignancy for Use in Clinical Practice
    Goswami, Pushpendra
    Salek, Sam
    Ionova, Tatyana
    Oliva, Esther Natalie
    Fielding, Adele K.
    Karakantza, Marina
    Al-Ismail, Saad
    Collins, Graham
    McConnell, Stewart
    Langton, Catherine
    Jennings, Daniel
    Else, Roger
    Kell, William J.
    [J]. BLOOD, 2017, 130
  • [46] Comments on "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Implant Surgery: A Pilot Study"
    Lovett-Carter, Danielle
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2019, 39 (09) : NP403 - NP403
  • [47] Patient-reported outcome measures favour use of mirabegron in patients with OAB
    Peter Sidaway
    [J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2015, 12 (11) : 593 - 593
  • [48] How to use patient-reported outcome measures with other clinical measurements in clinical reports
    Rodrigues, Jeremy N.
    Neblett, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (09) : 1007 - 1009
  • [49] A digital patient-reported outcome (electronic patient-reported outcome) system for patients with severe psychiatric disorders: User-centered development study and study protocol of a multicenter-controlled trial
    Wiegmann, Caspar
    Quinlivan, Esther
    Michnevich, Twyla
    Pittrich, Andreas
    Ivanova, Petja
    Rohrbach, Alissa Maresa
    Kaminski, Jakob
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcomes and Opioid Use by Outpatient Cancer Patients
    Moryl, Natalie
    Dave, Vinnidhy
    Glare, Paul
    Bokhari, Ali
    Malhotra, Vivek T.
    Gulati, Amitabh
    Hung, Joseph
    Puttanniah, Vinay
    Griffo, Yvona
    Tickoo, Roma
    Wiesenthal, Alison
    Horn, Susan D.
    Inturrisi, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 19 (03): : 278 - 290