Safety of adjustable gastric band conversion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the leak rate in 1-and 2-stage procedures

被引:11
|
作者
Zadeh, Jonathan [1 ]
Le, Christopher [1 ]
Ben-David, Kfir [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA
关键词
LAGB; Gastric band; Conversion surgery; Revisional surgery; One-stage; Two-stage; Leak; REVISIONAL BARIATRIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; 2-STEP CONVERSION; SINGLE-CENTER; STEPS; BYPASS; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; REMOVAL; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has been a popular bariatric surgery in the United States since the early 2000s. Over the years, various long-term complications have prompted removal of these devices. To avoid subsequent weight gain, explanation of the gastric band is often followed by concomitant or staged conversion to another bariatric procedure. Objective: It is our goal to evaluate the relative leak rate in 1- versus 2-stage adjustable gastric band conversion surgery. Setting: Private teaching hospital, United States. Methods: A search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases to evaluate literature regarding adjustable gastric band conversion procedures. After identification of publications that directly compared 1- and 2-stage laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding conversions, the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to determine if they would be used in our meta-analysis. The risk ratio for leak in 1- versus 2-stage conversions was then calculated. Results: Our search yielded 483 publications. Twenty-five publications qualified for inclusion. The overall calculated risk ratio for leak in 1- versus 2-stage conversions was.90 (confidence interval [CI] .51-1.61, P = .73). Eight publications were found that discussed conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The risk ratio for 1- versus 2-stage conversions for this subgroup was.82 (CI.35-1.93, P = .65). Eight publications were found that evaluated conversion to sleeve gastrectomy. The risk ratio of leak for 1- versus 2-stage conversions for these patients was 1.61 (CI.55-4.72, P = .39). Conclusions: Based on the results of this meta-analysis, there does not appear to be a significant difference in the overall leak rate between 1- and 2-stage adjustable gastric band conversions. The findings of our subgroup analysis suggest that there may be a safety advantage for 1-stage procedures when converting to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 2-stage procedures when converting to sleeve gastrectomy. (C) 2020 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 444
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic Management of Gastric Band Erosion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ameya Deshmukh
    Parth M. Desai
    Christine Ma
    Vladimir Kushnir
    Shaina Eckhouse
    Francesca M. Dimou
    Thomas R. McCarty
    Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi
    Obesity Surgery, 2024, 34 : 494 - 502
  • [22] Endoscopic Management of Gastric Band Erosion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Deshmukh, Ameya
    Desai, Parth M.
    Ma, Christine
    Kushnir, Vladimir
    Eckhouse, Shaina
    Dimou, Francesca M.
    Mccarty, Thomas R.
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (02) : 549 - 557
  • [23] Endoscopic Management of Gastric Band Erosion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Deshmukh, Ameya
    Desai, Parth
    Ma, Christine
    Kushnir, Vladimir
    Eckhouse, Shaina
    Dimou, Francesca
    McCarty, Thomas R.
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S984 - S985
  • [24] Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Colatruglio, Matthew
    Flanigan, David C.
    Long, Joseph
    DiBartola, Alex C.
    Magnussen, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (03): : 798 - 804
  • [25] Conversion rates in robotic thyroid surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martino, Barbara
    Nitro, Letizia
    De Pasquale, Loredana
    Lozza, Paolo
    Maccari, Alberto
    Castellani, Luca
    Piazzoni, Matilde
    Cardellicchio, Matteo
    Bulfamante, Antonio Mario
    Pipolo, Carlotta
    Felisati, Giovanni
    Saibene, Alberto Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2022, 18 (05):
  • [26] Impact of postoperative NSAIDs administration on anastomotic leak after esophago-gastric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Campanelli, Giampiero
    Bona, Davide
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 817 - 824
  • [27] Impact of postoperative NSAIDs administration on anastomotic leak after esophago-gastric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alberto Aiolfi
    Gianluca Bonitta
    Giampiero Campanelli
    Davide Bona
    Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 817 - 824
  • [28] Single-stage procedures for anorectal malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hartford, Leila
    Brisighelli, Giulia
    Gabler, Tarryn
    Westgarth-Taylor, Chris
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2022, 57 (09) : 75 - 84
  • [29] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ADJUSTABLE INTRAGASTRIC BALLOONS FOR TREATMENT OF OBESITY - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bapaye, Jay
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Khan, Shahab R.
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Ramai, Daryl
    Dhindsa, Banreet S.
    Shah, Aun R.
    Saghir, Syed Mohsin
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB18 - AB18
  • [30] Sex difference in the safety and efficacy of bariatric procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Risi, Renata
    Rossini, Giovanni
    Tozzi, Rossella
    Pieralice, Silvia
    Monte, Lavinia
    Masi, Davide
    Castagneto-Gissey, Lidia
    Gallo, Ida Francesca
    Strigari, Lidia
    Casella, Giovanni
    Bruni, Vincenzo
    Manfrini, Silvia
    Gnessi, Lucio
    Tuccinardi, Dario
    Watanabe, Mikiko
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2022, 18 (07) : 983 - 996