Optimal Covariate Balancing Conditions in Propensity Score Estimation

被引:14
|
作者
Fan, Jianqing [1 ]
Imai, Kosuke [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Inbeom [4 ]
Liu, Han [5 ]
Ning, Yang [4 ]
Yang, Xiaolin [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Operat Res & Financial Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Stat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
Average treatment effect; Causal inference; Double robustness; Model misspecification; Semiparametric efficiency; Sieve estimation; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; LARGE-SAMPLE PROPERTIES; MISSING DATA; ASYMPTOTIC NORMALITY; EFFICIENT ESTIMATION; INFERENCE; REGRESSION; WEIGHTS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/07350015.2021.2002159
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a popular method for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE). However, empirical studies show that the IPTW estimators can be sensitive to the misspecification of the propensity score model. To address this problem, researchers have proposed to estimate propensity score by directly optimizing the balance of pretreatment covariates. While these methods appear to empirically perform well, little is known about how the choice of balancing conditions affects their theoretical properties. To fill this gap, we first characterize the asymptotic bias and efficiency of the IPTW estimator based on the covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology under local model misspecification. Based on this analysis, we show how to optimally choose the covariate balancing functions and propose an optimal CBPS-based IPTW estimator. This estimator is doubly robust; it is consistent for the ATE if either the propensity score model or the outcome model is correct. In addition, the proposed estimator is locally semiparametric efficient when both models are correctly specified. To further relax the parametric assumptions, we extend our method by using a sieve estimation approach. We show that the resulting estimator is globally efficient under a set of much weaker assumptions and has a smaller asymptotic bias than the existing estimators. Finally, we evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators via simulation and empirical studies. An open-source software package is available for implementing the proposed methods.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 110
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Covariate balancing propensity score
    Imai, Kosuke
    Ratkovic, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2014, 76 (01) : 243 - 263
  • [2] The Role of Prediction Modeling in Propensity Score Estimation: An Evaluation of Logistic Regression, bCART, and the Covariate-Balancing Propensity Score
    Wyss, Richard
    Ellis, Alan R.
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    Girman, Cynthia J.
    Funk, Michele Jonsson
    LoCasale, Robert
    Stuermer, Til
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 180 (06) : 645 - 655
  • [3] COVARIATE BALANCING PROPENSITY SCORE BY TAILORED LOSS FUNCTIONS
    Zhao, Qingyuan
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2019, 47 (02): : 965 - 993
  • [4] Covariate balancing in propensity score estimation with variable selection: Based on GMM-LASSO approach
    Fan, Juyi
    Zhan, Mingfeng
    Cai, Zongwu
    Fang, Ying
    Lin, Ming
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2021, 41 (10): : 2631 - 2639
  • [5] PROPERTIES OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING PROCEDURES ON COVARIATE BALANCING AND ESTIMATION: INFLUENCE OF THE NUMBER OF PROPENSITY SCORE DIGITS USED ON MATCHED SETS CREATED
    Watanabe, J. H.
    Ney, J. P.
    Sullivan, S. D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A50 - A50
  • [6] Robust estimation of causal effects via a high-dimensional covariate balancing propensity score
    Ning, Yang
    Sida, Peng
    Imai, Kosuke
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2020, 107 (03) : 533 - 554
  • [7] Toward automated covariate selection for propensity score estimation
    Pearson, Ronald K.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 17 : S134 - S134
  • [8] A note on Covariate Balancing Propensity Score and Instrument-like variables
    Oyenubi, Adeola
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2020, 40 (01): : 202 - +
  • [9] COVARIATE BALANCING PROPENSITY SCORE FOR A CONTINUOUS TREATMENT: APPLICATION TO THE EFFICACY OF POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENTS
    Fong, Christian
    Hazlett, Chad
    Imai, Kosuke
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (01): : 156 - 177
  • [10] Covariate Adjustment and Propensity Score
    Garrido, Melissa M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (14): : 1521 - 1522