Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol

被引:8
|
作者
Quasdorf, Tina [1 ,2 ]
Clack, Lauren [3 ]
Laporte Uribe, Franziska [1 ,2 ]
Holle, Daniela [4 ]
Berwig, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Purwins, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Schultes, Marie-Therese [3 ]
Roes, Martina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Zentrum Neurodegenerat Erkrankungen eV DZ, Witten, Germany
[2] Univ Witten, Dept Pflegewissensch, Fak Gesundheit, Witten, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Implementat Sci Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Hsch Gesundheit, Dept Pflegewissensch, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Process evaluation; Frameworks; Models; Theory; Complex intervention; Implementation; Health care; Systematic scoping review; GLOSSARY;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Complex interventions in health care are characterized by multiple interacting components as well as by numerous nonlinear interactions with the social systems within which they are being implemented. The process of developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions is therefore challenging. Established guidance such as the MRC (Medical Research Council) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions refers to process evaluations as an integral part of the development of complex evidence-based interventions. Even though the need for process evaluations is recognized, the realization of such approaches is challenging because methodological instruction is sparse, and the phenomenon of interest is complex. A number of theoretical approaches indicating how to conduct process evaluations of complex interventions in health care exist, but a systematic and comprehensive overview of these is missing. Thus, the objective of the systematic scoping review described herein is to provide an overview and analysis of theoretical approaches suitable for the planning and conducting of process evaluations. Methods The design and conduct of this review will follow the procedures of a systematic scoping review. The search strategy will be developed following the BeHEMoTh (Behaviour of interest; Health context; Exclusions; Models or Theories) template which has been conceptualized for structured reviews of theory. The systematic search of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO) and PsycInfo (via EBSCO) electronic databases will be complemented by "hand searching" techniques. Study selection, data extraction, and data analysis will be performed by tandems of two researchers independently of each other. Divergent decisions and judgements between the two researchers will be discussed by the whole review team. Discussion The findings from this scoping review will provide an overview and comparison of theoretical approaches suitable for process evaluations of complex interventions in health care. The review results will support researchers in choosing the theoretical approach that best fits the respective focus of their process evaluation study. Systematic review registration This study has been registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under registration number .
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review
    Carl R. May
    Amanda Cummings
    Melissa Girling
    Mike Bracher
    Frances S. Mair
    Christine M. May
    Elizabeth Murray
    Michelle Myall
    Tim Rapley
    Tracy Finch
    Implementation Science, 13
  • [22] Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol
    Nabina Sharma
    Jennifer D. Walker
    Elizabeth Wenghofer
    Taima Moeke-Pickering
    Jeannette Lindenbach
    Systematic Reviews, 13
  • [23] Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review
    May, Carl R.
    Cummings, Amanda
    Girling, Melissa
    Bracher, Mike
    Mair, Frances S.
    May, Christine M.
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Myall, Michelle
    Rapley, Tim
    Finch, Tracy
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [24] Network approaches and interventions in healthcare settings: A systematic scoping review
    Saatchi, Ameneh Ghazal
    Pallotti, Francesca
    Sullivan, Paul
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [25] Mapping the progress and impacts of public health approaches to palliative care: a scoping review protocol
    Archibald, Daryll
    Patterson, Rebecca
    Haraldsdottir, Erna
    Hazelwood, Mark
    Fife, Shirley
    Murray, Scott A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07):
  • [26] Mental health and wellbeing interventions for care-experienced children and young people: Systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations
    Macdonald, Sarah
    Trubey, Rob
    Noyes, Jane
    Vinnicombe, Soo
    Morgan, Helen E.
    Willis, Simone
    Boffey, Maria
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    Robling, Michael
    Wooders, Charlotte
    Evans, Rhiannon
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2024, 156
  • [27] Palliative rehabilitation interventions in palliative care: a scoping review protocol
    Parola, Vitor
    Coelho, Adriana
    Neves, Hugo
    Cardoso, Daniela
    Almeida, Maria
    Cruz, Armenio
    Apostolo, Joao
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (11) : 2349 - 2356
  • [28] Complex interventions in healthcare and health informatics: A scoping review
    Kim, Julie
    Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2013, 183 : 263 - 268
  • [29] Interventions integrating health and academic interventions to prevent substance use and violence: a systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations
    Tancred, Tara
    Paparini, Sara
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    Fletcher, Adam
    Thomas, James
    Campbell, Rona
    Bonell, Chris
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [30] Ethnographic methods for process evaluations of complex health behaviour interventions
    Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah
    Wood, Fiona
    TRIALS, 2016, 17