Magnetometer measurements to characterize a subsurface coal fire

被引:30
|
作者
Ide, Taku S. [1 ]
Crook, Nigel [2 ]
Orr, F. M., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Precourt Inst Energy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] HydroGEOPHYSICS Inc, Tucson, AZ 85745 USA
关键词
Coal fire; Cesium vapor magnetometer; Magnetometer survey; Subsurface characterization; Monitoring; RADAR INTERFEROMETRY; JHARIA COALFIELD; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.coal.2011.06.007
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Underground coal fires pose a threat to the environment and the health of those living in their proximity and can result in economic losses if these fires occur at mining areas. Design of methods to extinguish these fires requires that the extent of the subsurface fire be delineated. A conceptual picture of the workings of a subsurface coal fire near Durango, CO is presented first, which shows how the overburden above the burning coal seam can become heated. In high temperature and low O-2 conditions, the heating of the overburden leads to the formation of magnetite, and its presence and the alignment of magnetic moments can be detected by a magnetometer. magnetometer surveys allow high resolution areal mapping that differentiates among previously burned, currently burning, and unburned coal seam areas. The current and previous locations of the subsurface fire regions that are delineated by the magnetometer survey conducted at a fire on the Southern Ute Indian Reservation are consistent with various supporting data such as gas composition, temperature, and snowmelt data. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 196
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS WITH ROTATING-SAMPLE MAGNETOMETER
    FLANDERS, PJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1973, MAG9 (02) : 94 - 109
  • [32] MULTICHANNEL FIBEROPTIC MAGNETOMETER SYSTEM FOR UNDERSEA MEASUREMENTS
    BUCHOLTZ, F
    VILLARRUEL, CA
    DAVIS, AR
    KIRKENDALL, CK
    DAGENAIS, DM
    MCVICKER, JA
    PATRICK, SS
    KOO, KP
    WANG, G
    VALO, H
    LUND, T
    ANDERSEN, AG
    GJESSING, R
    EIDEM, EJ
    KNUDSEN, T
    JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 13 (07) : 1385 - 1395
  • [33] A pulse field magnetometer for local magnetization measurements
    Espina-Hernández, JH
    Grössinger, R
    JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS, 2004, 369 (1-2) : 235 - 238
  • [34] ARCHEOMAGNETIC INTENSITY MEASUREMENTS USING A SQUID MAGNETOMETER
    WALTON, D
    AITKEN, MJ
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1977, 49 (01): : 281 - 281
  • [35] PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS IN SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGY
    DANE, JH
    MOLZ, FJ
    REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1991, 29 : 270 - 279
  • [36] ALTERNATIVES TO THE SQUID MAGNETOMETER FOR SOME BIOMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS
    TRONTELJ, Z
    LUZNIK, J
    PIRNAT, J
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA D-CONDENSED MATTER ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND CHEMICAL PHYSICS FLUIDS PLASMAS BIOPHYSICS, 1983, 2 (02): : 214 - 223
  • [37] CONTACTLESS MAGNETORESISTANCE MEASUREMENTS WITH A ROTATING SAMPLE MAGNETOMETER
    FLANDERS, PJ
    FISCHER, JE
    CARBON, 1982, 20 (02) : 130 - 130
  • [38] ROTATING SAMPLE MAGNETOMETER FOR DIAMAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY MEASUREMENTS
    HUDGENS, SJ
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1973, 44 (05): : 579 - 581
  • [39] CONTACTLESS MAGNETORESISTANCE MEASUREMENTS WITH A ROTATING SAMPLE MAGNETOMETER
    FLANDERS, PJ
    FISCHER, JE
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1982, 53 (03): : 320 - 325
  • [40] Superconducting quantum magnetometer for magnetic relaxation measurements
    Panaitov, G
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 1997, 59 (1-3) : 316 - 319