A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette

被引:25
|
作者
McEwan, Michael [1 ]
Azzopardi, David [1 ]
Gale, Nathan [1 ]
Camacho, Oscar M. [1 ]
Hardie, George [1 ]
Fearon, Ian M. [2 ]
Murphy, James [3 ]
机构
[1] British Amer Tobacco Investments Ltd, Res & Dev, Regents Pk Rd, Southampton SO15 8TL, Hants, England
[2] WhatIF Consulting Ltd, Harwell, Berks, England
[3] RAI Serv Co, 950 Reynolds Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27105 USA
关键词
4; MG; POLACRILEX; SMOKING; TOBACCO; ABSORPTION; PRODUCTS; DELIVERY; PHARMACOLOGY; METABOLISM; DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13318-021-00742-9
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives Nicotine pouches (NPs) are a relatively new type of oral smokeless tobacco-free nicotine product. Currently, few data are available on the nicotine pharmacokinetics or subjective effects of NP use. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption into the blood from different NP variants and a combustible cigarette. Methods In a randomised, controlled, crossover clinical study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects were compared among commercially available NPs (five different brands; 6-10 mg nicotine/pouch) and a combustible cigarette. During an 8-day confinement period, 35 healthy adult participants who were current dual users of snus and combustible cigarettes used one study product each day for a defined period following overnight nicotine abstinence. Results Nicotine maximum plasma concentration (C-max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between 0 and 6 h (AUC(0-6h)) were significantly greater for the Lyft 10 mg NP than for the cigarette (both p < 0.0001), while the other NPs had C-max and AUC(0-6h) values that were either greater than or similar to those of the cigarette. Plasma nicotine concentration was not associated with the nicotine contents of the NPs. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T-max) was higher for all NPs (60-65 min) than for the cigarette (7 min). Regarding subjective effects, liking and intent to use product again scores were higher for the cigarette than for any NP and were lowest for the NP with the lowest nicotine content. Conclusions This study provides important insight into nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects during NP use, and demonstrates that NPs can provide nicotine in amounts sufficient to replicate cigarette smokers' nicotine uptake following a switch from conventional cigarettes to these potentially less harmful NP products. Further studies are required to ascertain how physical characteristics of NPs other than nicotine content may affect nicotine delivery, pharmacokinetics and subjective responses.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 221
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What is the impact of nicotine pouches on oral health: a systematic review
    Rungraungrayabkul, Dulyapong
    Gaewkhiew, Piyada
    Vichayanrat, Tippanart
    Shrestha, Binit
    Buajeeb, Waranun
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [22] Oral mucosal changes caused by nicotine pouches: case series
    Miluna-Meldere, Sintija
    Vanka, Sarlote Agate
    Skadins, Ingus
    Kroica, Juta
    Sperga, Maris
    Rostoka, Dagnija
    DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [23] Genotoxicity Assessment of Combustible Cigarette and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Aerosols and Modern Oral Nicotine Product Extracts in the Ames and In Vitro Micronucleus Assays
    Leverette, Robert
    Wertman, John
    Shutsky, Thomas
    McRae, Reagan
    Szeliga, Ken
    Jordan, Kristen
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2022, 63 : 152 - 152
  • [24] PHARMACOKINETICS OF NICOTINE, COTININE, AND 3'-HYDROXYCOTININE IN CIGARETTE SMOKERS
    SCHERER, G
    JARCZYK, L
    HELLER, WD
    BIBER, A
    NEURATH, GB
    ADLKOFER, F
    KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1988, 66 : 5 - 11
  • [25] Y Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in two nicotine concentrations compared to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and comparator electronic nicotine delivery system
    Goldenson, Nicholas, I
    Buchhalter, August R.
    Augustson, Erik M.
    Rubinstein, Mark L.
    Van Hoof, Dennis
    Henningfield, Jack E.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2020, 217
  • [26] Characterization of the nicotine uptake and safety of Nordic spirit tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches: A randomized cross-over study
    Renard, Karine
    Nishihara, Daisuke
    Nilsson, Johan
    Larroque, Sylvain
    Martinez, Javier
    Giles, Lesley
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 242 (04) : 855 - 865
  • [27] Electronic cigarette nicotine delivery can exceed that of combustible cigarettes: a preliminary report
    Ramoa, Carolina P.
    Hiler, Marzena M.
    Spindle, Tory R.
    Lopez, Alexa A.
    Karaoghlanian, Nareg
    Lipato, Thokozeni
    Breland, Alison B.
    Shihadeh, Alan
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2016, 25 (E1) : E6 - E9
  • [28] A case for increasing taxes on cigarettes, vapes and oral nicotine pouches, Kenya
    Mostert, Cyprian M.
    Ayo-Yusuf, Olalekan A.
    Kumar, Manasi
    Aballa, Andrew
    Njoroge, Willie
    Bosire, Edna
    Khakali, Linda
    Thomi, John
    Muthaura, Karambu
    Atwoli, Lukoye
    Merali, Zul
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2024, 102 (08) : 618 - 620
  • [29] The Potential Impact of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Public Health: A Scoping Review
    Travis, Nargiz
    Warner, Kenneth E.
    Goniewicz, Maciej L.
    Oh, Hayoung
    Ranganathan, Radhika
    Meza, Rafael
    Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie
    Levy, David T.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (04) : 598 - 610
  • [30] Evaluating the effects of nicotine concentration on the appeal and nicotine delivery of oral nicotine pouches among rural and Appalachian adults who smoke cigarettes: A randomized cross-over study
    Keller-Hamilton, Brittney
    Alalwan, Mahmood A.
    Curran, Hayley
    Hinton, Alice
    Long, Lauren
    Chrzan, Kirsten
    Wagener, Theodore L.
    Atkinson, Leanne
    Suraapaneni, Sriya
    Mays, Darren
    ADDICTION, 2024, 119 (03) : 464 - 475