A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette

被引:25
|
作者
McEwan, Michael [1 ]
Azzopardi, David [1 ]
Gale, Nathan [1 ]
Camacho, Oscar M. [1 ]
Hardie, George [1 ]
Fearon, Ian M. [2 ]
Murphy, James [3 ]
机构
[1] British Amer Tobacco Investments Ltd, Res & Dev, Regents Pk Rd, Southampton SO15 8TL, Hants, England
[2] WhatIF Consulting Ltd, Harwell, Berks, England
[3] RAI Serv Co, 950 Reynolds Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27105 USA
关键词
4; MG; POLACRILEX; SMOKING; TOBACCO; ABSORPTION; PRODUCTS; DELIVERY; PHARMACOLOGY; METABOLISM; DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13318-021-00742-9
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives Nicotine pouches (NPs) are a relatively new type of oral smokeless tobacco-free nicotine product. Currently, few data are available on the nicotine pharmacokinetics or subjective effects of NP use. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption into the blood from different NP variants and a combustible cigarette. Methods In a randomised, controlled, crossover clinical study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects were compared among commercially available NPs (five different brands; 6-10 mg nicotine/pouch) and a combustible cigarette. During an 8-day confinement period, 35 healthy adult participants who were current dual users of snus and combustible cigarettes used one study product each day for a defined period following overnight nicotine abstinence. Results Nicotine maximum plasma concentration (C-max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between 0 and 6 h (AUC(0-6h)) were significantly greater for the Lyft 10 mg NP than for the cigarette (both p < 0.0001), while the other NPs had C-max and AUC(0-6h) values that were either greater than or similar to those of the cigarette. Plasma nicotine concentration was not associated with the nicotine contents of the NPs. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T-max) was higher for all NPs (60-65 min) than for the cigarette (7 min). Regarding subjective effects, liking and intent to use product again scores were higher for the cigarette than for any NP and were lowest for the NP with the lowest nicotine content. Conclusions This study provides important insight into nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects during NP use, and demonstrates that NPs can provide nicotine in amounts sufficient to replicate cigarette smokers' nicotine uptake following a switch from conventional cigarettes to these potentially less harmful NP products. Further studies are required to ascertain how physical characteristics of NPs other than nicotine content may affect nicotine delivery, pharmacokinetics and subjective responses.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 221
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette
    Michael McEwan
    David Azzopardi
    Nathan Gale
    Oscar M. Camacho
    George Hardie
    Ian M. Fearon
    James Murphy
    European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 2022, 47 : 211 - 221
  • [2] A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
    David Azzopardi
    James Ebajemito
    Michael McEwan
    Oscar M. Camacho
    Jesse Thissen
    George Hardie
    Richard Voisine
    Gavin Mullard
    Zvi Cohen
    James Murphy
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [3] A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
    Azzopardi, David
    Ebajemito, James
    McEwan, Michael
    Camacho, Oscar M.
    Thissen, Jesse
    Hardie, George
    Voisine, Richard
    Mullard, Gavin
    Cohen, Zvi
    Murphy, James
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [4] Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective response among adult smokers using different flavors of on!® nicotine pouches compared to combustible cigarettes
    Jesse Rensch
    Jianmin Liu
    Jingzhu Wang
    Andrea Vansickel
    Jeffery Edmiston
    Mohamadi Sarkar
    Psychopharmacology, 2021, 238 : 3325 - 3334
  • [5] Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective response among adult smokers using different flavors of on!® nicotine pouches compared to combustible cigarettes
    Rensch, Jesse
    Liu, Jianmin
    Wang, Jingzhu
    Vansickel, Andrea
    Edmiston, Jeffery
    Sarkar, Mohamadi
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 238 (11) : 3325 - 3334
  • [6] Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective responses after using nicotine pouches with different nicotine levels compared to combustible cigarettes and moist smokeless tobacco in adult tobacco users
    Liu, Jianmin
    Rensch, Jesse
    Wang, Jingzhu
    Jin, Xiaohong
    Vansickel, Andrea
    Edmiston, Jeffery
    Sarkar, Mohamadi
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 239 (09) : 2863 - 2873
  • [7] Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective responses after using nicotine pouches with different nicotine levels compared to combustible cigarettes and moist smokeless tobacco in adult tobacco users
    Jianmin Liu
    Jesse Rensch
    Jingzhu Wang
    Xiaohong Jin
    Andrea Vansickel
    Jeffery Edmiston
    Mohamadi Sarkar
    Psychopharmacology, 2022, 239 : 2863 - 2873
  • [8] Perceptions of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Reddit: Observational Study
    Shao, Yihan
    Zou, Jonathan
    Xie, Zidian
    Mayne, Rachel Grana
    Ossip, Deborah J.
    Rahman, Irfan
    McIntosh, Scott
    Li, Dongmei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (07)
  • [9] Oral nicotine pouches: a flavourful debate
    Wadhwa, S.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 236 (09) : 667 - 668
  • [10] Levels of nicotine and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in oral nicotine pouches
    Mallock, Nadja
    Schulz, Thomas
    Malke, Sebastian
    Dreiack, Nadine
    Laux, Peter
    Luch, Andreas
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2024, 33 (02) : 193 - 199