Effect of Mineral Dissolution/Precipitation and CO2 Exsolution on CO2 transport in Geological Carbon Storage

被引:67
|
作者
Xu, Ruina [1 ]
Li, Rong [1 ]
Ma, Jin [1 ]
He, Di [1 ]
Jiang, Peixue [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Key Lab Utilizat & Reduct Technol Beijing CO2, Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn, Minist Educ,Dept Thermal Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PORE-SCALE; SUPERCRITICAL CO2; INJECTION WELL; WATER; RESERVOIR; SEQUESTRATION; FLOW; WETTABILITY; SANDSTONE; DIOXIDE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00651
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Geological carbon sequestration (GCS) in deep saline aquifers is an effective means for storing carbon dioxide to address global climate change. As the time after injection increases, the safety of storage increases as the CO2 transforms from a separate phase to CO2(aq) and HCO3- by dissolution and then to carbonates by mineral dissolution. However, subsequent depressurization could lead to dissolved CO2(aq) escaping from the formation water and creating a new separate phase which may reduce the GCS system safety. The mineral dissolution and the CO2 exsolution and mineral precipitation during depressurization change the morphology, porosity, and permeability of the porous rock medium, which then affects the two-phase flow of the CO2 and formation water. A better understanding of these effects on the CO2 water two-phase flow will improve predictions of the long-term CO2 storage reliability, especially the impact of depressurization on the long-term stability. In this Account, we summarize our recent work on the effect of CO2 exsolution and mineral dissolution/precipitation on CO2 transport in GCS reservoirs. We place emphasis on understanding the behavior and transformation of the carbon components in the reservoir, including CO2(sc/g), CO2(aq), HCO3-, and carbonate minerals (calcite and dolomite), highlight their transport and mobility by coupled geochemical and two-phase flow processes, and consider the implications of these transport mechanisms on estimates of the long-term safety of GCS. We describe experimental and numerical pore- and core-scale methods used in our lab in conjunction with industrial and international partners to investigate these effects. Experimental results show how mineral dissolution affects permeability, capillary pressure, and relative permeability, which are important phenomena affecting the input parameters for reservoir flow modeling. The porosity and the absolute permeability increase when CO2 dissolved water is continuously injected through the core. The MRI results indicate dissolution of the carbonates during the experiments since the porosity has been increased after the core-flooding experiments. The mineral dissolution changes the pore structure by enlarging the throat diameters and decreasing the pore specific surface areas, resulting in lower CO2/water capillary pressures and changes in the relative permeability. When the reservoir pressure decreases, the CO2 exsolution occurs due to the reduction of solubility. The CO2 bubbles preferentially grow toward the larger pores instead of toward the throats or the finer pores during the depressurization. After exsolution, the exsolved CO2 phase shows low mobility due to the highly dispersed pore-scale morphology, and the well dispersed small bubbles tend to merge without interface contact driven by the Ostwald ripening mechanism. During depressurization, the dissolved carbonate could also precipitate as a result of increasing pH. There is increasing formation water flow resistance and low mobility of the CO2 in the presence of CO2 exsolution and carbonate precipitation. These effects produce a self-sealing mechanism that may reduce unfavorable CO2 migration even in the presence of sudden reservoir depressurization.
引用
收藏
页码:2056 / 2066
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Density Measurements of Supercritical CO2 + Dagang Brine for CO2 Geological Storage
    Zhang, Yi
    Shen, Yong
    Song, Yongchen
    Zhan, Yangchun
    Nishio, Masahiro
    Jian, Weiwei
    Xing, Wanli
    Hu, Cheng
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 5620 - 5627
  • [32] CO2/brine interfacial tension for geological CO2 storage: A systematic review
    Zhang, Cheng
    Wang, Milei
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 220
  • [33] Estimating a baseline of soil CO2 flux at CO2 geological storage sites
    Salmawati Salmawati
    Kyuro Sasaki
    Yuichi Sugai
    Amin Yousefi-Sahzabi
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191
  • [34] Carbon storage by mineral carbonation and industrial applications of CO2
    Neeraj
    Yadav S.
    Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2020, 3 : 494 - 500
  • [35] Numerical computations of rock dissolution and geomechanical effects for CO2 geological storage
    Wojtacki, K.
    Lewandowska, J.
    Gouze, Ph.
    Lipkowski, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2015, 39 (05) : 482 - 506
  • [36] The Effect of Aquifer/Caprock Interface on Geological Storage of CO2
    Shariatipour, Seyed M.
    Pickup, Gillian E.
    Mackay, Eric J.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 5544 - 5555
  • [37] Nanoconfined Water Effect on CO2 Utilization and Geological Storage
    Zhang, Kaiqiang
    Liu, Lirong
    Huang, Guohe
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (15)
  • [38] Potential for geological storage of CO2 in the Netherlands
    Schreurs, HCE
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 303 - 308
  • [39] CO2 Geological Storage Potential in Korea
    Huh, Dae-Gee
    Park, Yong-Chan
    Yoo, Dong-Geun
    Hwang, Se-Ho
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 4881 - 4888
  • [40] AN OVERVIEW OF CO2 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE IN CHINA
    Qiao, Xiaojuan
    Li, Guomin
    MeDermott, Christopher I.
    Wu, Runjian
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 9 (07): : 889 - 896