Effect of Mineral Dissolution/Precipitation and CO2 Exsolution on CO2 transport in Geological Carbon Storage

被引:67
|
作者
Xu, Ruina [1 ]
Li, Rong [1 ]
Ma, Jin [1 ]
He, Di [1 ]
Jiang, Peixue [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Key Lab Utilizat & Reduct Technol Beijing CO2, Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn, Minist Educ,Dept Thermal Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PORE-SCALE; SUPERCRITICAL CO2; INJECTION WELL; WATER; RESERVOIR; SEQUESTRATION; FLOW; WETTABILITY; SANDSTONE; DIOXIDE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00651
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Geological carbon sequestration (GCS) in deep saline aquifers is an effective means for storing carbon dioxide to address global climate change. As the time after injection increases, the safety of storage increases as the CO2 transforms from a separate phase to CO2(aq) and HCO3- by dissolution and then to carbonates by mineral dissolution. However, subsequent depressurization could lead to dissolved CO2(aq) escaping from the formation water and creating a new separate phase which may reduce the GCS system safety. The mineral dissolution and the CO2 exsolution and mineral precipitation during depressurization change the morphology, porosity, and permeability of the porous rock medium, which then affects the two-phase flow of the CO2 and formation water. A better understanding of these effects on the CO2 water two-phase flow will improve predictions of the long-term CO2 storage reliability, especially the impact of depressurization on the long-term stability. In this Account, we summarize our recent work on the effect of CO2 exsolution and mineral dissolution/precipitation on CO2 transport in GCS reservoirs. We place emphasis on understanding the behavior and transformation of the carbon components in the reservoir, including CO2(sc/g), CO2(aq), HCO3-, and carbonate minerals (calcite and dolomite), highlight their transport and mobility by coupled geochemical and two-phase flow processes, and consider the implications of these transport mechanisms on estimates of the long-term safety of GCS. We describe experimental and numerical pore- and core-scale methods used in our lab in conjunction with industrial and international partners to investigate these effects. Experimental results show how mineral dissolution affects permeability, capillary pressure, and relative permeability, which are important phenomena affecting the input parameters for reservoir flow modeling. The porosity and the absolute permeability increase when CO2 dissolved water is continuously injected through the core. The MRI results indicate dissolution of the carbonates during the experiments since the porosity has been increased after the core-flooding experiments. The mineral dissolution changes the pore structure by enlarging the throat diameters and decreasing the pore specific surface areas, resulting in lower CO2/water capillary pressures and changes in the relative permeability. When the reservoir pressure decreases, the CO2 exsolution occurs due to the reduction of solubility. The CO2 bubbles preferentially grow toward the larger pores instead of toward the throats or the finer pores during the depressurization. After exsolution, the exsolved CO2 phase shows low mobility due to the highly dispersed pore-scale morphology, and the well dispersed small bubbles tend to merge without interface contact driven by the Ostwald ripening mechanism. During depressurization, the dissolved carbonate could also precipitate as a result of increasing pH. There is increasing formation water flow resistance and low mobility of the CO2 in the presence of CO2 exsolution and carbonate precipitation. These effects produce a self-sealing mechanism that may reduce unfavorable CO2 migration even in the presence of sudden reservoir depressurization.
引用
收藏
页码:2056 / 2066
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying the precipitation and dissolution of CO2 within geological carbon storage analogues
    Gilfillan, Stuart
    Ballentine, Chris
    Lollar, Barbara Sherwood
    Stevens, Scott
    Schoell, Martin
    Cassidy, Martin
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2008, 72 (12) : A309 - A309
  • [2] CO2 Compression and Dehydration for Transport and Geological Storage
    Bielka, Pawel
    Kuczynski, Szymon
    Nagy, Stanislaw
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (04)
  • [3] Rates of CO2 Mineralization in Geological Carbon Storage
    Zhang, Shuo
    DePaolo, Donald J.
    ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 50 (09) : 2075 - 2084
  • [4] CO2 Capture and Storage : the geological carbon sink
    Czernichowski-Lauriol, Isabelle
    COMPTES RENDUS GEOSCIENCE, 2020, 352 (4-5) : 383 - 399
  • [5] Rates of mineral dissolution under CO2 storage conditions
    Black, Jay R.
    Carroll, Susan A.
    Haese, Ralf R.
    CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2015, 399 : 134 - 144
  • [6] CO2 Geological Storage and Utilization
    Huang, Liang
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (07)
  • [7] Risk of CO2 Geological Storage
    Uliasz-Misiak, Barbara
    ROCZNIK OCHRONA SRODOWISKA, 2008, 10 : 623 - 632
  • [8] CO2 geological storage economics
    Allinson, G
    Nguyen, V
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 615 - 620
  • [9] CO2 storage in heterogeneous aquifer: A study on the effect of temperature and mineral precipitation
    Raza, A.
    Gholami, R.
    Rezaee, R.
    Bing, C. H.
    Nagarajan, R.
    Hamid, M. A.
    29TH SYMPOSIUM OF MALAYSIAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERS (SOMCHE) 2016, 2017, 206
  • [10] CO2 and NOx reactions with CO2 storage reservoir core: NOx dissolution products and mineral reactions
    Turner, Luc G.
    Dawson, Grant K.W.
    Golding, Suzanne D.
    Pearce, Julie K.
    International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2022, 120