Opening the 'Black Box': An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys

被引:13
|
作者
Rigby, Dan [1 ]
Vass, Caroline [2 ]
Payne, Katherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
关键词
TIME-TO-THINK; DISCRETE-CHOICE; EYE-TRACKING; VISUAL-ATTENTION; RESPONSE LATENCY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM EEG; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; RESPONDENTS TIME; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-019-00385-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The desire to understand the preferences of patients, healthcare professionals and the public continues to grow. Health valuation studies, often in the form of discrete choice experiments, a choice based survey approach, proliferate as a result. A variety of methods of pre-choice process analysis have been developed to investigate how and why people make their decisions in such experiments and surveys. These techniques have been developed to investigate how people acquire and process information and make choices. These techniques offer the potential to test and improve theories of choice and/or associated empirical models. This paper provides an overview of such methods, with the focus on their use in stated choice-based healthcare studies. The methods reviewed are eye tracking, mouse tracing, brain imaging, deliberation time analysis and think aloud. For each method, we summarise the rationale, implementation, type of results generated and associated challenges, along with a discussion of possible future developments.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Locating Chart Choice Based on the Decision-Making Approach
    Ivanov, Vitalii
    Botko, Frantisek
    Kolos, Vitalii
    Pavlenko, Ivan
    Hatala, Michal
    Antosz, Katarzyna
    Trojanowska, Justyna
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [42] Open the box: A behavioural perspective on the reshoring decision-making and implementation process
    Boffelli, Albachiara
    Golini, Ruggero
    Orzes, Guido
    Dotti, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (03)
  • [43] Osteoporosis Treatment Attributes and Levels for an Online Decision-Making Tool for Patients: Findings from Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Curtis, Jeffrey
    Gavigan, Kelly
    Nowell, W. Benjamin
    Curtis, David
    Ali, Danielle
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Makaroff, Katherine
    Almario, Christopher
    Khalil, Carine
    Choi, So Yung
    Spiegel, Brennan
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 75 : 4012 - 4013
  • [44] Why is the environment important for decision making? Local reservoir model for choice-based learning
    Naruse, Makoto
    Yamamoto, Eiji
    Nakao, Takashi
    Akimoto, Takuma
    Saigo, Hayato
    Okamura, Kazuya
    Ojima, Izumi
    Northoff, Georg
    Hori, Hirokazu
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [45] Decision Making in the Real World: Unpacking the Black Box of the Decision Process for Youth Violence
    Gibbs, Carole
    Cobbina-Dungy, Jennifer E.
    De Biasi, Alaina
    Rivers, Louie
    Light, Jessica
    Momenee, Taylor
    CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2024, 70 (10) : 2563 - 2594
  • [46] OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT ATTRIBUTES AND LEVELS FOR AN ONLINE DECISION-MAKING TOOL FOR PATIENTS: FINDINGS FROM ADAPTIVE CHOICE-BASED CONJOINT ANALYSIS
    Curtis, J. R.
    Gavigan, K.
    Nowell, W. B.
    Curtis, D.
    Ali, D.
    Liu, X.
    Makaroff, K.
    Almario, C.
    Khalil, C.
    Choi, S. Y.
    Spiegel, B.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 35 : S297 - S298
  • [49] Police Officer Decision-making in Dispute Encounters: Digging Deeper into the 'Black Box'
    Bonner, Heidi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2015, 40 (03) : 493 - 522
  • [50] Police Officer Decision-making in Dispute Encounters: Digging Deeper into the ‘Black Box’
    Heidi S. Bonner
    American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2015, 40 : 493 - 522