Opening the 'Black Box': An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys

被引:13
|
作者
Rigby, Dan [1 ]
Vass, Caroline [2 ]
Payne, Katherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
关键词
TIME-TO-THINK; DISCRETE-CHOICE; EYE-TRACKING; VISUAL-ATTENTION; RESPONSE LATENCY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM EEG; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; RESPONDENTS TIME; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-019-00385-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The desire to understand the preferences of patients, healthcare professionals and the public continues to grow. Health valuation studies, often in the form of discrete choice experiments, a choice based survey approach, proliferate as a result. A variety of methods of pre-choice process analysis have been developed to investigate how and why people make their decisions in such experiments and surveys. These techniques have been developed to investigate how people acquire and process information and make choices. These techniques offer the potential to test and improve theories of choice and/or associated empirical models. This paper provides an overview of such methods, with the focus on their use in stated choice-based healthcare studies. The methods reviewed are eye tracking, mouse tracing, brain imaging, deliberation time analysis and think aloud. For each method, we summarise the rationale, implementation, type of results generated and associated challenges, along with a discussion of possible future developments.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Opening the ‘Black Box’: An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys
    Dan Rigby
    Caroline Vass
    Katherine Payne
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2020, 13 : 31 - 41
  • [2] Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making
    Robbert Biesbroek
    Johann Dupuis
    Andrew Jordan
    Adam Wellstead
    Michael Howlett
    Paul Cairney
    Jeremy Rayner
    Debra Davidson
    Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 : 493 - 494
  • [3] Opening the black box of employee entrepreneurship decision-making
    Ye, Qingyan
    Wang, Duanxu
    Zeng, Kai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (06): : 1548 - 1579
  • [4] Reply to 'Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making'
    Eisenack, Klaus
    Moser, Susanne C.
    Hoffmann, Esther
    Klein, Richard J. T.
    Oberlack, Christoph
    Pechan, Anna
    Rotter, Maja
    Termeer, Catrien J. A. M.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (06) : 494 - 495
  • [5] Reply to 'Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making'
    Klaus Eisenack
    Susanne C. Moser
    Esther Hoffmann
    Richard J. T. Klein
    Christoph Oberlack
    Anna Pechan
    Maja Rotter
    Catrien J. A. M. Termeer
    Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 : 494 - 495
  • [6] CORRESPONDENCE: Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making
    Biesbroek, Robbert
    Dupuis, Johann
    Jordan, Andrew
    Wellstead, Adam
    Howlett, Michael
    Cairney, Paul
    Rayner, Jeremy
    Davidson, Debra
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (06) : 493 - 494
  • [7] Social value and individual choice: The value of a choice-based decision-making process in a collectively funded health system
    Antonio Espinoza, Manuel
    Manca, Andrea
    Claxton, Karl
    Sculpher, Mark
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 27 (02) : E28 - E40
  • [8] Opening the 'Black Box' of asylum governance: decision-making and the politics of asylum policy-making
    Pettrachin, Andrea
    ITALIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW-RIVISTA ITALIANA DI SCIENZA POLITICA, 2020, 50 (02) : 191 - 212
  • [10] The Relationship Decision Making Box: A Questionnaire for Exploring the Decision-Making Process
    Larsen, Nate
    Gray, Malcolm
    Eckstein, Daniel
    FAMILY JOURNAL, 2014, 22 (02): : 222 - 225