Increasing Throughput in Fused Deposition Modeling by Modulating Bed Temperature

被引:12
|
作者
Snapp, Kelsey L. [1 ]
Gongora, Aldair E. [1 ]
Brown, Keith A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 110 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
fused deposition modeling (FDM); bed adhesion; removal temperature; additive manufacturing; process engineering; sensing; monitoring and diagnostics; FILAMENT;
D O I
10.1115/1.4050177
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) techniques, such as fused deposition modeling (FDM), are able to fabricate physical components from three-dimensional (3D) digital models through the sequential deposition of material onto a print bed in a layer-by-layer fashion. In FDM and many other AM techniques, it is critical that the part adheres to the bed during printing. After printing, however, excessive bed adhesion can lead to part damage or prevent automated part removal. In this work, we validate a novel testing method that quickly and cheaply evaluates bed adhesion without constraints on part geometry. Using this method, we study the effect of bed temperature on the peak removal force for polylactic acid (PLA) parts printed on bare borosilicate glass and polyimide (PI)-coated beds. In addition to validating conventional wisdom that bed adhesion is maximized between 60 and 70 degrees C (140 and 158 degrees F), we observe that cooling the bed below 40 degrees C (104 degrees F), as is commonly done to facilitate part removal, has minimal additional benefit. Counterintuitively, we find that heating the bed after printing is often a more efficient process for facile part removal. In addition to introducing a general method for measuring and optimizing bed adhesion via bed temperature modulation, these results can be used to accelerate the production and testing of AM components in printer farms and autonomous research systems.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Study on Polypropylene Applied in Fused Deposition Modeling
    Dong, Mu
    Zhang, Shijun
    Gao, Dali
    Chou, Baige
    PROCEEDINGS OF PPS-34: THE 34TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE POLYMER PROCESSING SOCIETY - CONFERENCE PAPERS, 2019, 2065
  • [42] Watermarking for Fused Deposition Modeling by Seam Placement
    Baumann, Felix W.
    Roller, Dieter
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL, MANUFACTURING, MODELING AND MECHATRONICS (IC4M 2017) - 2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE (ICDES 2017), 2017, 104
  • [43] A Review of Variable Slicing in Fused Deposition Modeling
    Nadiyapara H.H.
    Pande S.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2017, 98 (3) : 387 - 393
  • [44] Understanding error generation in fused deposition modeling
    Bochmann, Lennart
    Bayley, Cindy
    Helu, Moneer
    Transchel, Robert
    Wegener, Konrad
    Dornfeld, David
    SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY-METROLOGY AND PROPERTIES, 2015, 3 (01):
  • [45] Study on surface texture of Fused Deposition Modeling
    Reddy, Vijeth
    Flys, Olena
    Chaparala, Anish
    Berrimi, Chihab E.
    Amogh, V
    Rosen, B. G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH SWEDISH PRODUCTION SYMPOSIUM (SPS 2018), 2018, 25 : 389 - 396
  • [46] New developments in fused deposition modeling of ceramics
    Bellini, A
    Shor, L
    Guceri, SI
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (04) : 214 - 220
  • [47] Simulation of edge quality in fused deposition modeling
    Armillotta, Antonio
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03) : 541 - 554
  • [48] Performance assessment of fused deposition modeling process
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman
    Mian, Syed Hammad
    Ameen, Wadea
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (01):
  • [49] Fused Deposition Modeling of Polyolefins: Challenges and Opportunities
    Verma, Nandishwar
    Awasthi, Pratiksha
    Gupta, Akash
    Banerjee, Shib Shankar
    MACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 308 (01)
  • [50] Heat transfer modeling in fused deposition techniques
    Duarte, F. M.
    Costa, S. F.
    Covas, J. A.
    HIGH VALUE MANUFACTURING: ADVANCED RESEARCH IN VIRTUAL AND RAPID PROTOTYPING, 2014, : 519 - 523