Accuracy of Screening Mammography in Older Women

被引:38
|
作者
Sinclair, Natalie [1 ]
Littenberg, Benjamin [2 ]
Geller, Berta [3 ]
Muss, Hyman [4 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Hematol Oncol, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Sch Med, Dept Gen Internal Med, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Off Hlth Promot Res, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hematol Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
breast cancer; elderly women; mammography performance; mammography screening; women's imaging; CANCER-SOCIETY GUIDELINES; BREAST-CANCER; AGE; DIAGNOSIS; MORTALITY; EFFICACY; UPDATE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.5442
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the accuracy and cancer detection rate of screening mammography in women as they age. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using data from the Vermont Breast Cancer Surveillance System (1996-2006), we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and cancer detection rate by decade of age for 403,448 mammograms of 96,193 women 50-101 years old. Confounding variables were assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS. The sensitivity of screening mammography increased from 77.3% for the 50- to 59-year-old group to 93.8% for the 90- to 101-year-old group (p = 0.015). Specificity increased from 98.7% to 98.8% at age 50-59 compared with age 90-101 (p < 0.001), respectively. The cancer detection rate increased from 3.7 cases per 1000 mammograms at age 50-59 to 14.4 cases per 1000 mammograms at age 90-101 (p < 0.001). The prevalence of breast cancer increased from 4.8% to 15.4% across age groups (p < 0.001) as did the positive predictive value from 22.2% to 55.6% (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of confounding by body mass index, breast density, or other factors. Tumors were more likely to be small, hormone receptor-positive, and more invasive as women aged. Accuracy parameters were all associated with age without evidence of confounding by regression analysis. CONCLUSION. Screening mammography is more accurate in older women than in younger women, suggesting that it may be of value in assessing women in all age groups. These data do not address the impact of mammography screening on mortality or breast cancer outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1273
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Screening Mammography on Other Preventive Services in Older Women
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Cantor, Scott B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (03) : 669 - 670
  • [22] Predictors of varying levels of nonadherence to mammography screening in older women
    Levy-Storms, L
    Bastani, R
    Reuben, DB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (05) : 768 - 773
  • [23] Knowledge of breast cancer and screening mammography in older women.
    Moreen, TF
    Raik, BL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (04) : S179 - S179
  • [24] Screening mammography in older women: A pilot study of residents' decisions
    Upshur, REG
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2002, 14 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [25] Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older
    Michielutte, R
    Sharp, PC
    Foley, KL
    Cunningham, LE
    Spangler, JG
    Paskett, ED
    Case, LD
    HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (02) : 149 - 162
  • [26] Screening and cognitive impairment: Ethics of forgoing mammography in older women
    Raik, BL
    Miller, FG
    Fins, JJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (03) : 440 - 444
  • [27] SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY AND OLDER HISPANIC WOMEN - CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES
    FOX, SA
    ROETZHEIM, RG
    CANCER, 1994, 74 (07) : 2028 - 2033
  • [28] Decision-Making Regarding Mammography Screening for Older Women
    Schonberg, Mara A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 (12) : 2413 - 2418
  • [29] Screening mammography and breast cancer treatment patterns in older women
    Jon F. Kerner
    Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
    Rebecca A. Silliman
    John J. Lynch
    Ruby Senie
    Caryn Cohen
    Yi-Ting Hwang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2001, 69 : 81 - 91