Objective Quality Metrics in Correlation with Subjective Quality Metrics for Steganography

被引:1
|
作者
Wazirali, Raniyah [1 ]
Slehat, Shaher [1 ]
Chaczko, Zenon [1 ]
Borowik, Grzegorz [2 ]
Carrion, Lucia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Warsaw Univ Technol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1109/APCASE.2015.49
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The main goal of hiding data is to conceal the very existence of the hidden information, therefore there is a significant demand for steganographic approaches that can ensure imperceptibility of such infromation. However, there is a limited corresponding evaluation parameters available. Most of the studies use the Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) as a metric for imperceptibility evaluation, although it could provide less accurate results than the Human Visual System (HVS) evaluation. This paper provides a review of the existent evaluation metrics that are used to assess the quality of steganography. The examination of the correlation between the existing objective and subjective metrics is also conducted. Pixel differences metrics have a poor correlation with the subjective metrics, hence the HSV based metrics have better correlation than pixel metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessment of quality of JPEG XL proposals based on subjective methodologies and objective metrics
    Akyazi, Pinar
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XLII, 2019, 11137
  • [12] A Novel Methodology for Mapping Objective Video Quality Metrics to the Subjective MOS Scale
    Moldovan, Arghir-Nicolae
    Ghergulescu, Ioana
    Muntean, Cristina Hava
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BROADBAND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS AND BROADCASTING (BMSB), 2014,
  • [13] Subjective and objective assesment of visual image quality metrics and still image codecs
    Richter, Thomas
    Larabi, Chaker
    DCC: 2008 DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 541 - 541
  • [14] Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality
    Chen, L
    Singer, B
    Guirao, A
    Porter, J
    Williams, DR
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2005, 82 (05) : 358 - 369
  • [15] Benchmarking of objective quality metrics for HDR image quality assessment
    Hanhart, Philippe
    Bernardo, Marco V.
    Pereira, Manuela
    Pinheiro, Antonio M. G.
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING, 2015, : 1 - 18
  • [16] Benchmarking of objective quality metrics for HDR image quality assessment
    Philippe Hanhart
    Marco V. Bernardo
    Manuela Pereira
    António M. G. Pinheiro
    Touradj Ebrahimi
    EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2015
  • [17] VQAMap: A Novel Mechanism for Mapping Objective Video Quality Metrics to Subjective MOS Scale
    Moldovan, Arghir-Nicolae
    Ghergulescu, Ioana
    Muntean, Cristina Hava
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 2016, 62 (03) : 610 - 627
  • [18] Special issue on objective video quality metrics
    Mitra, SK
    Pearson, J
    Caviedes, J
    SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2004, 19 (02) : 99 - 100
  • [19] Are existing procedures enough? Image and video quality assessment: Review of subjective and objective metrics
    Ouni, S.
    Chambah, M.
    Herbin, M.
    Zagrouba, E.
    IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE V, 2008, 6808
  • [20] Subjective Assessment of Objective Image Quality Metrics Range Guaranteeing Visually Lossless Compression
    Afnan
    Ullah, Faiz
    Yaseen
    Lee, Jinhee
    Jamil, Sonain
    Kwon, Oh-Jin
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (03)