Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia

被引:39
|
作者
Cromi, A. [1 ]
Ghezzi, F. [1 ]
Di Naro, E. [2 ]
Siesto, G. [1 ]
Bergamini, V. [3 ]
Raio, L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Del Ponte Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Varese, Italy
[2] Univ Bari, Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[4] Univ Bern Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
diabetes; estimated fetal weight; macrosomia; ultrasound; umbilical cord; Wharton's jelly;
D O I
10.1002/uog.5183
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether a large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord is a predictor of fetal macrosomia. Methods Consecutive Patients of > 34 weeks' gestation, who presented for sonographic examination and who delivered within 4 weeks of the examination, were included in the study. The sonographic cross-sectional areas of the umbilical cord, the umbilical vessels and the Wharton's jelly were measured in a free loop of the umbilical cord. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of macrosomia (actual birth weight > 4000 g and > 4500 g). Fetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length), sonographic estimated fetal weight and umbilical cord area > 95(th) centile for gestational age were used as covariates. Results During the study period, 1026 patients were enrolled. Fifty-three (5.2%) newborns had a birth weight >4000g, and 22 (2.1%) weighed >4500g. The proportion of cases with a large umbilical cord was significantly higher in the group of macrosomic compared with non-macrosomic infants (54.7% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.0001). Multiple regression models demonstrated an independent contribution of the large cord in the prediction of birth weight > 4000 g and > 4500 g (odds ratio (9S% CI), 20.6 (9.2-45.9) and 4.2 (1.2-17.7), respectively). The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of a sonographic large umbilical cord were 54.7%, 91.3%, 25.4%, and 97.4%, respectively. The combination of abdominal circumference >95(th) centile and large cord predicted 100% of macrosomic infants. The proportion of umbilical cords with a Wharton's jelly area > 95(th) centile for gestation was significantly higher in macrosomic fetuses of diabetic compared with non-diabetic mothers. Conclusions Sonographic assessment of umbilical cord area may improve the prediction of fetal macrosomia. Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:861 / 866
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Umbilical Cord Biometry and Fetal Abdominal Skinfold Assessment as Potential Biomarkers for Fetal Macrosomia in a Gestational Diabetes Romanian Cohort
    Florian, Andreea Roxana
    Cruciat, Gheorghe
    Nemeti, Georgiana
    Staicu, Adelina
    Suciu, Cristina
    Sulaiman, Mariam Chaikh
    Goidescu, Iulian
    Muresan, Daniel
    Stamatian, Florin
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (09):
  • [22] Large-for-gestational-age or macrosomia as a classifier for risk of adverse perinatal outcome: a retrospective cross-sectional study
    Modzelewski, Jan
    Pokropek, Artur
    Jakubiak-Proc, Monika
    Muzyka-Placzynska, Katarzyna
    Filipecka-Tyczka, Dagmara
    Kajdy, Anna
    Rabijewski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 5564 - 5571
  • [23] Upper cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Application of a new technique for measuring cross-sectional area on magnetic resonance images
    Mann, Ranbir S.
    Constantinescu, Cris S.
    Tench, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 26 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [24] Cross sectional area of the fetal corpus callosum
    Birnholz, JC
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 490 - 490
  • [25] Inter- and intra-observer variability in Sonographic measurements of the cross-sectional diameters and area of the umbilical cord and its vessels during pregnancy
    Barbieri C.
    Cecatti J.G.
    Souza C.E.
    Marussi E.F.
    Costa J.V.
    Reproductive Health, 5 (1)
  • [26] DETERMINANTS OF GLOMERULAR CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
    NEWBOLD, KM
    HOWIE, AJ
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1990, 162 (04): : 329 - 332
  • [27] CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF FLEXIBLE TUBES
    KRESCH, E
    BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 1979, 41 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [28] Cross-sectional area of the mandible - Discussion
    Dodson, TB
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 55 (07) : 693 - 693
  • [29] Validation of Anthropometric Muscle Cross-Sectional Area Equation after Spinal Cord Injury
    Wade, Rodney C.
    Lester, Robert M.
    Gorgey, Ashraf S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 39 (05) : 366 - 373
  • [30] Dynamic changes in the cross-sectional area of the dural sac and spinal cord in the thoracic spine
    Daigo Morita
    Yasutsugu Yukawa
    Hiroaki Nakashima
    Keigo Ito
    Go Yoshida
    Masaaki Machino
    Syunsuke Kanbara
    Toshiki Iwase
    Fumihiko Kato
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 64 - 70