Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Germany - Update 2010

被引:6
|
作者
Fischer, C. A. [1 ]
Kaszap, B. [1 ]
Drexler, C. [1 ]
Lehner, B. [1 ]
Clarius, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orthopad Univ Klin Heidelberg, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Vulpius Klin, Bad Rappenau, Germany
来源
关键词
cementing technique; total hip arthroplasty; bone cement; FOLLOW-UP; PROCEDURE VOLUME; JET-LAVAGE; REPLACEMENT; CHARNLEY; FIXATION; PENETRATION; OUTCOMES; MINIMUM; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1055/s-0031-1298261
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The results of a national survey from 1998 showed that only around 10% of orthopaedic surgeons in Germany had strictly implemented modern third-generation cementing techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A 2005 update showed an improvement up to 29.4%. The study was repeated in 2010 in order to evaluate the current situation and to determine whether modern cementing techniques have become more popular. Material and Methods: A detailed, slightly modified questionnaire regarding cement and bone preparation, cementing techniques on acetabulurn and femur, and implant types was sent to 492 German orthopaedic and trauma hospitals, as well as to visiting surgeons with an interest in THA. The survey was conducted over 6 months. The response rate was 51.8%, 255 questionnaires were available for evaluation and statistical analysis. Results: Palacos R+G bone cement remained the most widely used cement (52.2%). The mixing times given varied significantly. Vacuum mixing systems have again become more popular (85.2%). In the femur 78.6% of the surgeons attempted to preserve cancellous bone and 77.8% used pulsatile (jet) lavage. Retrograde cement application via a cement gun was done in 85.8%. Cement restrictors were used in more than 98%. Only 72.7% of the surgeons implemented sustained cement pressurisation and preferred a cement mantle thickness over 2 mm (55.2%). Only 18.1% drilled multiple small acetabular keyholes and 66.5% used jet lavage. In 67.9% no cement gun was used and in 70.7% the cement was applied at high viscosity. Cement pressurisation was done manually in 89.1%. The Muller straight stem device remained the most popular implant. Only 7.4% of the centres implanted less than 20 and 40.3% more than 100 cemented stems per year, whereby higher THA volumes correlated with better cementing technique. Conclusion: The results of this survey demonstrate that, in comparison to 2005, the current state of cemented THA, in particular cementing technique has generally significantly improved. Future emphasis should focus on continued surgeon education and training, as the cementing techniques are of utmost importance for long-term durability.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 317
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of arthroplasty principles to canine cemented total hip replacement
    Schulz, KS
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2000, 29 (06) : 578 - 593
  • [32] Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: Update
    Capello, William N.
    D'Antonio, James A.
    Feinberg, Judy R.
    Manley, Michael T.
    Naughton, Marybetb
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (07): : 39 - 43
  • [33] Recent update on crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty
    Langlois, Jean
    Hamadouche, Moussa
    SICOT-J, 2020, 6
  • [34] An Update on Cementless Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Kheir, Michael M.
    Drayer, Nicholas J.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (18): : 1646 - 1661
  • [35] Radiographic assessment of biomechanical parameters following hip resurfacing and cemented total hip arthroplasty
    Robb, Curtis
    Haris, Richard
    O'Dwyer, Kevin
    Aslam, Nadim
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 19 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [36] COMPARISON OF CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH BILATERAL HIP ARTHROPLASTIES
    HEARN, SL
    BICALHO, PS
    ENG, K
    BOOTH, RE
    HOZACK, WJ
    ROTHMAN, RH
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1995, 10 (05): : 603 - 608
  • [37] Current status of revision total hip arthroplasty in Germany
    Lakemeier, Stefan
    Peterlein, Christian D.
    Belz, Alexander
    Timmesfeld, Nina
    Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne
    Schofer, Markus D.
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2010, 55 (04): : 219 - 227
  • [38] Fracture of the precoated femoral component after cemented total hip arthroplasty
    Yamasaki, Satoshi
    Masuhara, Kensaku
    Fuji, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2006, 11 (03) : 308 - 311
  • [39] Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals
    Maloney, WJ
    Schmalzried, T
    Harris, WH
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (405) : 70 - 78
  • [40] Revision of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cementless Components in Three Dogs
    Torres, Bryan T.
    Budsberg, Steven C.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2009, 38 (01) : 81 - 86