Single-family versus multi-family introductions

被引:25
|
作者
Vergeer, P [1 ]
van den Berg, LJL [1 ]
Roelofs, JGM [1 ]
Ouborg, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Aquat Ecol & Environm Biol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Arnica montana; conservation; introduction strategies; restoration; transplantation;
D O I
10.1055/s-2005-865904
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The early success of plant introduction as a function of source material and habitat quality was tested in Arnica montano to determine whether different introduction strategies could affect plant viability of the introduced population. Plants originating from related (single-family introductions) and unrelated (multi-family introductions) individuals were introduced into undisturbed sites and into sites which were limed, turf cut, or both turf cut and limed. For four consecutive years, we analysed plant performance by measuring survival time, growth, and reproductive capacity. Introduction success was found to be strongly affected by habitat quality. Turf cutting in combination with additional liming significantly increased reproductive capacity and stimulated early flowering. To restore eutrophic and acidified soil conditions, turf cutting with additional liming prior to introduction is recommended. Furthermore, a significant effect of multi-family introductions was observed. Multi-family introductions showed higher introduction success compared to single-family introductions. Although the long-term effects of multi-family introductions will emerge after several generations, the preliminary results suggest multi-family introductions as the most successful introduction strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 515
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SINGLE-FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND
    VITT, L
    [J]. REAL ESTATE REVIEW, 1979, 9 (03): : 9 - 10
  • [42] SERVICE CALCULATIONS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY APARTMENTS
    BICKNER, WE
    [J]. EC&M-ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE, 1985, 84 (01): : 125 - 125
  • [43] Is the Single-Family Home Dying Out?
    Koll-Schretzenmayr, Martina
    [J]. DISP, 2011, 47 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [44] Single-family housing - The private domain
    Bretler, M
    [J]. A + U-ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 1999, (348): : 171 - 171
  • [45] THE EFFICIENCY OF THE MARKET FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES
    CASE, KE
    SHILLER, RJ
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1989, 79 (01): : 125 - 137
  • [46] The View From Minneapolis: Comments on "Death to Single-Family Zoning" and "It's Time to End Single-Family Zoning"
    Mogush, Paul
    Worthington, Heather
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2020, 86 (01) : 120 - 120
  • [47] Project Approval for Single-Family Condominiums
    Marcin, Daniel
    McFarlane, Alastair
    [J]. CITYSCAPE, 2020, 22 (01) : 279 - 291
  • [48] Single-family house? You may!
    Bonfig, Architekt Peter
    Dehlinger, Bauingenieur Christian
    Cremers, Architekt Jan
    [J]. BAUTECHNIK, 2023, 100 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [49] SINGLE-FAMILY CONCRETE HOMES IN IOWA
    不详
    [J]. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, 1983, 28 (10): : 737 - &
  • [50] Multi-family Therapy with Families of Children with Developmental Delays, Chronic Illness and Disabilities: "The Frankfurt Multi-family Therapy Model"
    Goll-Kopka, Andrea
    [J]. PRAXIS DER KINDERPSYCHOLOGIE UND KINDERPSYCHIATRIE, 2009, 58 (09) : 716 - 732