Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:182
|
作者
Cooper, Katy L. [1 ]
Madan, Jason [2 ]
Whyte, Sophie [1 ]
Stevenson, Matt D. [1 ]
Akehurst, Ron L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Acad Unit Primary Hlth Care, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY; ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER; NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; DAILY FILGRASTIM; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-11-404
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) occurs following myelosuppressive chemotherapy and is associated with morbidity, mortality, costs, and chemotherapy reductions and delays. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) stimulate neutrophil production and may reduce FN incidence when given prophylactically following chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of G-CSFs (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim or lenograstim) in reducing FN incidence in adults undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumours or lymphoma. G-CSFs were compared with no primary G-CSF prophylaxis and with one another. Nine databases were searched in December 2009. Meta-analysis used a random effects model due to heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies compared primary G-CSF prophylaxis with no primary G-CSF prophylaxis: five studies of pegfilgrastim; ten of filgrastim; and five of lenograstim. All three G-CSFs significantly reduced FN incidence, with relative risks of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.65) for pegfilgrastim, 0.57 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.69) for filgrastim, and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.88) for lenograstim. Overall, the relative risk of FN for any primary G-CSF prophylaxis versus no primary G-CSF prophylaxis was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41 to 0.62). In terms of comparisons between different G-CSFs, five studies compared pegfilgrastim with filgrastim. FN incidence was significantly lower for pegfilgrastim than filgrastim, with a relative risk of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.98). Conclusions: Primary prophylaxis with G-CSFs significantly reduces FN incidence in adults undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumours or lymphoma. Pegfilgrastim reduces FN incidence to a significantly greater extent than filgrastim.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for infertility undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fu, Lu-lu
    Xu, Ying
    Yan, Jing
    Zhang, Xue-ying
    Li, Dan-dan
    Zheng, Lian-wen
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [42] Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review
    Mitchell, Sarah
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Woods, Matthew
    Garcia, Jacob
    Hebard-Massey, Kerri
    Barron, Rich
    Samuel, Miny
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (05) : 702 - 716
  • [43] Febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with short- and long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors during treatment of solid tumours
    Kwinta, Lukasz
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 16 (01): : 9 - 13
  • [44] Colony-stimulating factors in the prevention of solid tumors induced by chemotherapy in patients with febrile neutropenia
    Freyer, G
    Ligneau, B
    Trillet-Lenoir, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1998, 10 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [45] Febrile neutropenia and role of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Yuri Kimura
    Shinsuke Sasada
    Akiko Emi
    Norio Masumoto
    Takayuki Kadoya
    Morihito Okada
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 3507 - 3512
  • [46] Febrile neutropenia and role of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Kimura, Yuri
    Sasada, Shinsuke
    Emi, Akiko
    Masumoto, Norio
    Kadoya, Takayuki
    Okada, Morihito
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (07) : 3507 - 3512
  • [47] INCIDENCE OF CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NEUTROPENIA IN LYMPHOMA PATIENTS AND USE OF PROPHYLAXIS WITH GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
    Salar, A.
    Lopez, A.
    Torres, J. Pio
    Lopez, M. D.
    Caballero, M. D.
    Prieto, E.
    Battle, M.
    Giraldo, P.
    Blasco, A.
    Benedit, P.
    Garrido, T.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 94 : 521 - 521
  • [48] Appropriateness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients receiving chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk level
    Baig, Hassam
    Somlo, Barbara
    Eisen, Melissa
    Stryker, Scott
    Bensink, Mark
    Morrow, Phuong K.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (07) : 1576 - 1585
  • [49] The economics of febrile neutropenia: Implications for the use of colony-stimulating factors
    Lyman, GH
    Kuderer, N
    Greene, J
    Balducci, L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (12) : 1857 - 1864
  • [50] Colony-Stimulating Factors for Febrile Neutropenia during Cancer Therapy
    Bennett, Charles L.
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    Norris, LeAnn B.
    Armitage, James O.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (12): : 1131 - 1139