Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:182
|
作者
Cooper, Katy L. [1 ]
Madan, Jason [2 ]
Whyte, Sophie [1 ]
Stevenson, Matt D. [1 ]
Akehurst, Ron L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Acad Unit Primary Hlth Care, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY; ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER; NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; DAILY FILGRASTIM; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-11-404
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) occurs following myelosuppressive chemotherapy and is associated with morbidity, mortality, costs, and chemotherapy reductions and delays. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) stimulate neutrophil production and may reduce FN incidence when given prophylactically following chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of G-CSFs (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim or lenograstim) in reducing FN incidence in adults undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumours or lymphoma. G-CSFs were compared with no primary G-CSF prophylaxis and with one another. Nine databases were searched in December 2009. Meta-analysis used a random effects model due to heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies compared primary G-CSF prophylaxis with no primary G-CSF prophylaxis: five studies of pegfilgrastim; ten of filgrastim; and five of lenograstim. All three G-CSFs significantly reduced FN incidence, with relative risks of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.65) for pegfilgrastim, 0.57 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.69) for filgrastim, and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.88) for lenograstim. Overall, the relative risk of FN for any primary G-CSF prophylaxis versus no primary G-CSF prophylaxis was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41 to 0.62). In terms of comparisons between different G-CSFs, five studies compared pegfilgrastim with filgrastim. FN incidence was significantly lower for pegfilgrastim than filgrastim, with a relative risk of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.98). Conclusions: Primary prophylaxis with G-CSFs significantly reduces FN incidence in adults undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumours or lymphoma. Pegfilgrastim reduces FN incidence to a significantly greater extent than filgrastim.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Katy L Cooper
    Jason Madan
    Sophie Whyte
    Matt D Stevenson
    Ron L Akehurst
    BMC Cancer, 11
  • [2] The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li Wang
    Onur Baser
    Lucie Kutikova
    John H. Page
    Richard Barron
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015, 23 : 3131 - 3140
  • [3] The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Li
    Baser, Onur
    Kutikova, Lucie
    Page, John H.
    Barron, Richard
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (11) : 3131 - 3140
  • [4] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors as prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia
    Cortes de Miguel, Sol
    Angel Calleja-Hernandez, Miguel
    Menjon-Beltran, Salomon
    Vallejo-Rodriguez, Inmaculada
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (02) : 547 - 559
  • [5] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors as prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia
    Sol Cortés de Miguel
    Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández
    Salomón Menjón-Beltrán
    Inmaculada Vallejo-Rodríguez
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015, 23 : 547 - 559
  • [6] The Impact of Primary Prophylaxis with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors on Febrile Neutropenia during Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Li
    Baser, Onur
    Kutikova, Lucie
    Page, John H.
    Barron, Richard L.
    BLOOD, 2014, 124 (21)
  • [7] Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?
    Aapro, Matti
    Crawford, Jeffrey
    Kamioner, Didier
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2010, 18 (05) : 529 - 541
  • [8] Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?
    Matti Aapro
    Jeffrey Crawford
    Didier Kamioner
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2010, 18 : 529 - 541
  • [9] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
    Cornes, Paul
    Gascon, Pere
    Chan, Stephen
    Hameed, Khalid
    Mitchell, Catherine R.
    Field, Polly
    Latymer, Mark
    Arantes, Luiz H., Jr.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2018, 35 (11) : 1816 - 1829
  • [10] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
    Paul Cornes
    Pere Gascon
    Stephen Chan
    Khalid Hameed
    Catherine R. Mitchell
    Polly Field
    Mark Latymer
    Luiz H. Arantes
    Advances in Therapy, 2018, 35 : 1816 - 1829