C-Reactive Protein Values After Colorectal Resection: Can We Discharge a Patient With a C-Reactive Protein Value >100? A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:21
|
作者
Benoit, Olivier [1 ]
Faron, Mathieu [1 ]
Margot, Nicolas [1 ]
Creavin, Ben [2 ]
Debove, Clotilde [1 ]
Tiret, Emmanuel [1 ]
Parc, Yann [1 ]
Lefevre, Jeremie H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paris VI Univ, Dept Gen & Digest Surg, Hop St Antoine, AP HP, Paris, France
[2] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Elm Pk, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Colorectal resection; C-reactive protein; Morbidity; Readmission; FAST-TRACK SURGERY; BLOOD-CELL COUNTS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; PREDICTOR; SEVERITY; EXCISION;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001216
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein is a useful negative predictive test for the development of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Evolution of procedures (laparoscopy, enhanced recovery program, early discharge, complex redo surgery) may influence C-reactive protein values; however, this is poorly studied to date. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate C-reactive protein as an indicator of postoperative complication and as a predictor for discharge. DESIGN: This is retrospective study of a consecutive monocentric cohort. SETTINGS: All patients undergoing a colorectal resection with anastomosis (2014-2015) were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: C-reactive protein, leukocytosis, type of resection, and postoperative course were the primary outcomes measured. RESULTS: A total of 522 patients were included. The majority had either a colorectal (n = 159, 31%) or coloanal anastomosis (n = 150, 29%). Overall morbidity was 29.3%. C-reactive protein was significantly higher among patient having intra-abdominal complications at an early stage (day 1-2) (164.6 vs 136.2; p = 0.0028) and late stage (day 3-4) (209.4 vs 132.1; p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, early C-reactive protein was associated with BMI (coefficient, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2-6.5; p < 0.0001) and open surgical procedures (coefficient, 43.1; 95% CI, 27-59.1; p < 0.0001), while late C-reactive protein value was influenced by BMI (coefficient, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.5-7.0; p = 0.0024) and associated extracolonic procedures (coefficient, 34.2; 95% CI, 2.7-65.6; p = 0.033). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values for intra-abdominal complication were 85.9%, 33.6%, 89.3%, and 27.1% for an early C-reactive protein <100 mg/L and 72.7%, 75.4%, 89.4%, and 49.2% for a late C-reactive protein < 100 mg/L. Four hundred seven patients with an uneventful postoperative course were discharged at day 8 +/- 6.4 with a mean discharge C-reactive protein of 83.5 +/- 67.4. Thirty-eight patients (9.3%) were readmitted and had a significantly higher discharge C-reactive protein (138.6 +/- 94.1 vs 77.8 +/- 61.2, p = 0.0004). Readmission rate was 16.5% for patients with a discharge C-reactive protein >100 mg/L vs 6% with C-reactive protein < 100 mg/L (p = 0.0008). For patients included in an enhanced recovery program (discharge at day 4 +/- 2.4), the threshold should be higher because discharge is around day 3 or 4. With a C-reactive protein < 140, readmission rate was 2% vs 19%, (p = 0.056). LIMITATIONS: This study includes retrospective data. CONCLUSION: C-reactive protein <100 mg/L is associated with a lower risk of intra-abdominal complication and readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A749.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 96
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immunoanalytical characteristics of C-reactive protein and high sensitivity C-reactive protein
    Moutachakkir, Mariame
    Hanchi, Asma Lamrani
    Baraou, Azzedine
    Boukhira, Abderrahman
    Chellak, Saliha
    ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2017, 75 (02) : 225 - 229
  • [32] Exclusion of Anastomosis Leakage after Colorectal Surgery using C-reactive protein: A Retrospective Study
    Amoli, Hadi Ahmadi
    Karoobi, Mohamadreza
    Mahmoudabadi, Hossein Zabihi
    Ghorbani, Saeid
    Hajebi, Reza
    Rahimpour, Ehsan
    Davari, Farzad Vaghef
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 24 (02)
  • [33] C-REACTIVE PROTEIN AS A PREDICTOR OF READMISSION AFTER COLORECTAL SURGERY
    Chaumont, Nicole
    Johnson, Anna
    Barnes, Emilie C.
    Brown, Rebecca F.
    Strassle, Paula D.
    Fichera, Alessandro
    Koruda, Mark
    Sadiq, Timothy S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S1313 - S1314
  • [34] C-reactive protein as early predictor of complications after minimally invasive colorectal resection
    Pedrazzani, Corrado
    Moro, Margherita
    Mantovani, Guido
    Lazzarini, Enrico
    Conci, Simone
    Ruzzenente, Andrea
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 210 : 261 - 268
  • [35] THE DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
    HANSON, LA
    JODAL, U
    SABEL, KG
    WADSWORTH, C
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1983, 2 (02) : 87 - 90
  • [36] The value of C-reactive protein in emergency medicine
    Su, Yu-Jang
    JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE, 2014, 3 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [37] Elevated C-reactive protein levels at ICU discharge as a predictor of ICU outcome: a retrospective cohort study
    S. Sophie Gülcher
    Nynke A. Bruins
    W. Peter Kingma
    E. Christiaan Boerma
    Annals of Intensive Care, 6
  • [38] THE VALUE OF C-REACTIVE PROTEIN IN CHILDREN WITH MENINGITIS
    QURTOM, HA
    ALSALAH, QA
    LUBANI, MM
    DOUDIN, KI
    SHARDA, DC
    JOHN, AI
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 1989, 9 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [39] Elevated C-reactive protein levels at ICU discharge as a predictor of ICU outcome: a retrospective cohort study
    Gulcher, S. Sophie
    Bruins, Nynke A.
    Kingma, W. Peter
    Boerma, E. Christiaan
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 6 : 1 - 8
  • [40] C-reactive protein levels, variation in the c-reactive protein gene, and cancer risk: The Rotterdam Study
    Siemes, Claire
    Visser, Loes E.
    Coebergh, Jan-Willem W.
    Splinter, Ted A. W.
    Witteman, Jacqueline C. M.
    Uitterlinden, Andre G.
    Hofman, Albert
    Pols, Huibert A. P.
    Stricker, Bruno H. Ch.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (33) : 5216 - 5222