Detection of Pancreatic Carcinoma and Liver Metastases with Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison with Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT

被引:144
|
作者
Motosugi, Utaroh [1 ]
Ichikawa, Tomoaki [1 ]
Morisaka, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Sou, Hironobu [1 ]
Muhi, Ali [1 ]
Kimura, Kazufumi [1 ]
Sano, Katsuhiro [1 ]
Araki, Tsutomu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Radiol, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
关键词
GD-EOB-DTPA; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HELICAL CT; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; MDCT; PATIENT; LESIONS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11103548
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To intraindividually compare gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in detection of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases. Materials and Methods: The ethics committee approved this retrospective study with waiver of informed consent. This study included 100 patients (53 men, 47 women; mean age, 67.8 years) consisting of 54 patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic carcinoma (mean size, 33 mm) and 46 without a pancreatic lesion. Sixty-two liver metastases (mean size, 10 mm) in 15 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were diagnosed at pathologic examination or multimodality assessment. Three readers blinded to the final diagnosis interpreted all MR (precontrast T1- and T2-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic and hepatocyte phase MR images) and tetraphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced CT images and graded the presence (or absence) of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastasis on patient-by-patient and lesion-by-lesion bases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, McNemar test, and Fisher test were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of CT and MR imaging. Results: No significant differences were observed between CT and MR images in depiction of pancreatic carcinoma. However, MR imaging had greater sensitivity in depicting liver metastasis than did CT for two of the three readers in the MR imaging-versus-CT analysis (85% vs 69%, P = .046) and for all three readers in the lesion-by-lesion analysis (92%-94% vs 74%-76%, P = .030-.044). Conclusion: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging was equivalent to dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in depicting pancreatic carcinoma and had better sensitivity for depicting liver metastases, suggesting the usefulness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. (C) RSNA, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 453
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: Effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement af the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    McNulty, NJ
    Francis, IR
    Platt, JF
    Cohan, RH
    Korobkin, M
    Gebremariam, A
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) : 97 - 102
  • [22] Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: Multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings
    Huppertz, A
    Balzer, T
    Blakeborough, A
    Breuer, L
    Giovagnoni, A
    Heinz-Peer, G
    Laniado, M
    Manfredi, RM
    Mathieu, DG
    Mueller, D
    Reimer, P
    Robinson, PJ
    Strotzer, M
    Taupitz, M
    Vogl, TJ
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (01) : 266 - 275
  • [23] Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular and genetic background
    Azusa Kitao
    Osamu Matsui
    Norihide Yoneda
    Kazuto Kozaka
    Satoshi Kobayashi
    Wataru Koda
    Dai Inoue
    Takahiro Ogi
    Kotaro Yoshida
    Toshifumi Gabata
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 3438 - 3447
  • [24] Imaging Study of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Usefulness of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Sou, Hironobu
    Muhi, Ali M.
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Nakano, Masayuki
    Sakamoto, Michiie
    Nakazawa, Tadao
    Asakawa, Masami
    Fujii, Hideki
    Kitamura, Takatoshi
    Enomoto, Nobuyuki
    Araki, Tsutomu
    RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (03) : 834 - 844
  • [25] Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular and genetic background
    Kitao, Azusa
    Matsui, Osamu
    Yoneda, Norihide
    Kozaka, Kazuto
    Kobayashi, Satoshi
    Koda, Wataru
    Inoue, Dai
    Ogi, Takahiro
    Yoshida, Kotaro
    Gabata, Toshifumi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) : 3438 - 3447
  • [26] Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation
    M. Scharitzer
    A. Ba-Ssalamah
    H. Ringl
    C. Kölblinger
    T. Grünberger
    M. Weber
    W. Schima
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 2187 - 2196
  • [28] Contrast enhanced multi-detector CT and MR findings of a well-differentiated pancreatic vipoma
    Camera, Luigi
    Severino, Rosa
    Faggiano, Antongiulio
    Masone, Stefania
    Mansueto, Gelsomina
    Maurea, Simone
    Fonti, Rosa
    Salvatore, Marco
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 6 (10): : 840 - 845
  • [29] Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation
    Scharitzer, M.
    Ba-Ssalamah, A.
    Ringl, H.
    Koelblinger, C.
    Gruenberger, T.
    Weber, M.
    Schima, W.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (08) : 2187 - 2196
  • [30] Improved detection of liver metastases with contrast-enhanced wideband harmonic imaging: Comparison with CT findings
    Esteban, J.M.
    Mollá, M.A.
    Tomás, C.
    Maldonado, L.
    European Journal of Ultrasound, 2002, 15 (03) : 119 - 126