Comparison of losartan and amlodipine in renally impaired hypertensive patients

被引:22
|
作者
Fernández-Andrade, C
Russo, D
Iversen, B
Zucchelli, P
Aranda, P
Guerra, L
Casado, S
机构
[1] Hosp Virgen Rocio, Serv Nefrol, Seville 41013, Spain
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Cattedra Nefrol, Naples, Italy
[3] Med Avd Haukeland, Bergen, Norway
[4] Policlin S Orsola, Div Nefrol Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
[5] H Carlos Haya, Serv Nefrol, Malaga, Spain
[6] H Sao Joao, Dept Nephrol, Porto, Portugal
[7] Fdn Jimenez Diaz, Serv Nefrol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
essential hypertension; albuminuria; blood pressure; end-stage renal disease; hydrochlororthiazide;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ki.4490576
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Effects of losartan and amlodipine on blood pressure and albuminuria were compared in a randomized, double-blind, parallel trial involving 48 patients with essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure between 95 to 115 mm Hg) and impaired renal function (creatinine clearance of 30 to 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). After four weeks of placebo administration, patients were stratified according to baseline albuminuria (< or greater than or equal to 300 mu g/min) and randomized to once-daily treatment with losartan 50 mg (N = 24) or amlodipine 5 mg (N = 24) for 12 weeks. Titration to losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg was possible at weeks 3 or 6 for patients having an inadequate blood pressure response. After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean decreases in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressures were significantly larger in the losartan group (-18.1 +/- 7.2 and -27.7 +/- 15.2 mm Hg) than in the amlodipine group (-12.4 +/- 7.5 and -16.3 +/-: 12.1 mm Hg; P = 0.009 and P = 0.008, respectively). The greater antihypertensive response to losartan was not influenced by the initial degree of albuminuria. The losartan and amlodipine regimens were well-tolerated. Baseline levels of albuminuria were reduced after 12 weeks of losartan treatment (median change of -29.5 mu g/min), while amlodipine therapy was associated with a median increase (48.4 mu g/min) in this renal marker at week 12. The treatment difference was statistically significant (P = 0.021). These results indicate that losartan 50 mg, administered alone or in combination with HCTZ 12.5 mg, is more effective than amlodipine 5/10 mg in lowering blood pressure and albuminuria in patients with essential hypertension complicated by impaired renal function.
引用
收藏
页码:S120 / S124
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Renoprotective effect of losartan in comparison to amlodipine in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension; a report from Japanese losartan therapy intended for the global renal protection in hypertensive patients(JLIGHT study).
    Lino, Y
    Kawaguchi, Y
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 785A - 785A
  • [22] Bortezomib in renally impaired multiple myeloma patients
    Miguel, J. F. San
    Richardson, P. G.
    Sonneveld, P.
    Schuster, M. W.
    Irwin, D.
    Stadtmauer, E. A.
    Facon, T.
    Harousseau, J. L.
    Ben-Yehuda, D.
    Lonial, S.
    Goldschmidt, H.
    Reece, D.
    Blade, J.
    Boccadoro, M.
    Neuwirth, R.
    Boral, A. L.
    Esseltine, D. L.
    Anderson, K. C.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 92 (06): : 214 - 215
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF ANTIBIOTICS IN SERUM OF RENALLY IMPAIRED PATIENTS
    BORNER, K
    NIEREN-UND HOCHDRUCKKRANKHEITEN, 1990, 19 (11) : 489 - 491
  • [25] Pharmacokinetics of nateglinide in renally impaired diabetic patients
    Devineni, D
    Walter, YH
    Smith, HT
    Lee, JS
    Prasad, P
    McLeod, JF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 43 (02): : 163 - 170
  • [26] Crossover comparison of the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and felodipine ER in hypertensive patients
    Videbaek, LM
    Jacobsen, IA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 35 (11) : 514 - 518
  • [27] Renal mitochondrial dysfunction in spontaneously hypertensive rats is attenuated by losartan but not by amlodipine
    de Cavanagh, EMV
    Toblli, JE
    Ferder, L
    Piotrkowski, B
    Stella, I
    Inserra, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 290 (06) : R1616 - R1625
  • [28] Comparison of amlodipine and losartan in the treatment of hypertension: A naturalistic inquiry
    Tang, S
    Arocho, R
    McLaughlin, T
    Antell, L
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 : S398 - S398
  • [29] Losartan reverses impaired osseointegration in spontaneously hypertensive rats
    Mulinari-Santos, Gabriel
    de Souza Batista, Fabio Roberto
    Kirchweger, Franziska
    Tangl, Stefan
    Gruber, Reinhard
    Okamoto, Roberta
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (11) : 1126 - 1134
  • [30] Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect of 3 antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients
    Lin, SL
    Wu, SC
    Liu, CP
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 23 : S116 - S116