Feasibility and Safety of a Modified Outpatient Regimen With Intravenous/Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Optimally Debulked Stage III Ovarian Cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Bruixola, Gema [1 ]
Domingo, Santiago [2 ]
Diaz, Roberto [1 ]
Caballero, Javier [1 ]
Palomar, Laura [1 ]
De La Cueva, Helena [1 ]
Santaballa, Ana [1 ]
机构
[1] La Fe Univ & Polytech Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] La Fe Univ & Polytech Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Valencia 46026, Spain
关键词
Epithelial ovarian cancer; Chemotherapy; Cisplatin-paclitaxel protocol; Intraperitoneal infusions; Outpatient infusion therapy; INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; PACLITAXEL; TRIAL; CARBOPLATIN; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000330
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy improves survival in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. However, the need for inpatient administration and the perceived higher toxicity rates compared with standard intravenous chemotherapy have limited its widespread application. Several modified outpatient schemes, such as the Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group (GEICO) regimen, have been tested and have reported overall better tolerance with an improvement in completion treatment rates. The aim of our study was to assess the toxicity of the GEICO regimen in patients treated at our institution. Methods: We reviewed clinical records of stage III ovarian cancer patients with optimally debulked primary cytoreduction surgery that were treated from June 2009 to April 2013 with the GEICO regimen. Patients received intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) for 3 hours on day 1, IP cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) on day 2, and IP paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)) on day 8 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: Twenty-one patients were identified. In 67% of the patients, IP port placement was performed at the primary surgery. The most common grade 3-to-4 toxicities seen were abdominal pain (14.3%) and neurotoxicity (9.5%). Eighteen patients (85.7%) completed the 6 cycles. Three patients stopped chemotherapy because of treatment-related toxicity. There were no serious port-related complications. With a median follow-up of 46 months, median progression-free survival was 23 months (95% confidence interval [11.8-34.6]). Nine patients (42.9%) have relapsed; most relapses were multifocal and extraperitoneal. Conclusion: The administration of the GEICO outpatient modified regimen was feasible with a good safety profile. It seems to show less toxicity than previously reported IP chemotherapy regimens. In our institution, port-related complications were infrequent and easily managed. However, further studies are warranted to establish the optimal IP regimen in a prospective manner and to validate it in a larger phase 3 trial.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 221
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraperitoneal cisplatin-based chemotherapy vs. intravenous cisplatin-based chemotherapy for stage III optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Yen, MS
    Juang, CM
    Lai, CR
    Chao, GC
    Ng, HT
    Yuan, CC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2001, 72 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [22] Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for stage III ovarian cancer - In reply
    Alberts, DS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) : 957 - 958
  • [23] Adherence and adverse events of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients: Real-life study
    Ballesta-Lopez, Octavio
    Albert-Mari, Asuncion
    Borrell-Garcia, Carmela
    Melian-Sosa, Marcos
    Salvador-Coloma, Carmen
    Santaballa-Bertran, Ana
    Poveda-Andres, Jose Luis
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (02) : 268 - 278
  • [24] A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study of serum CA-125 levels in patients with stage III optimally debulked ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal compared to intravenous chemotherapy: An analysis of patients enrolled in GOG 172
    Krivak, Thomas C.
    Tian, Chunqiao
    Rose, G. Scott
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Maxwell, G. Larry
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 115 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [25] Outpatient intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer chemotherapy-A comparison of reimbursement for intraperitoneal versus intravenous therapy
    Schink, J. C.
    Bamlett-Sherman, T.
    Anastos, L. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [26] Utilization of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for optimally debulked advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: A single institution experience with a racially diverse urban population
    Miller, E. M.
    Tymon-Rosario, J.
    Xie, X.
    Van Arsdale, A.
    Novetsky, A. P.
    Gressel, G. M.
    Miller, D. T.
    Goldberg, G. L.
    Kuo, D. Y. S.
    Nevadunsky, N. S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 162 - 163
  • [27] Health-related quality of life during and after intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy for optimally debulked ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Wenzel, Lari B.
    Huang, Helen Q.
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Walker, Joan L.
    Cella, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (04) : 437 - 443
  • [28] Phase I Trial of Intraperitoneal Pemetrexed, Cisplatin, and Paclitaxel in Optimally Debulked Ovarian Cancer
    Chambers, Setsuko K.
    Chow, H-H. Sherry
    Janicek, Mike F.
    Cragun, Janiel M.
    Hatch, Kenneth D.
    Cui, Haiyan
    Laughren, Cynthia
    Clouser, Mary C.
    Cohen, Janice L.
    Wright, Heather M.
    Abu Shahin, Nisreen
    Alberts, David S.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (09) : 2668 - 2678
  • [29] A Modified Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Regimen for Ovarian Cancer: Technique and Treatment Outcomes
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Ha, Hyeong In
    Kim, Min Hae
    Han, Mi Ra
    Park, Sang-Yoon
    Lim, Myong Cheol
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [30] IMPACT OF TIME OF SURGERY IN OPTIMALLY DEBULKED STAGE III&IV EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER(EOC)
    Barretina-Ginesta, M. P.
    Ahmed-Ouahid, H.
    Sala, E.
    Lindo, D.
    Buxo, M.
    Sala-Gonzalez, N.
    Florensa, A.
    Taltavull, A.
    Brunet-Vidal, J.
    Alvarez-Castano, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 404 - 405