3D finite-difference dynamic-rupture modeling along nonplanar faults

被引:26
|
作者
Cruz-Atienza, Victor M.
Virieux, Jean
Aochi, Hideo
机构
[1] UNSA, CNRS, Geosci Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France
[2] Bur Rech Geol & Minieres, Orleans, France
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.2766756
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Proper understanding of seismic emissions associated with the growth of complexly shaped microearthquake networks and larger-scale nonplanar fault ruptures, both in arbitrarily heterogeneous media, requires accurate modeling of the underlying dynamic processes. We present a new 3D dynamic-rupture, finite-difference model called the finite-difference, fault-element (FDFE) method; it simulates the dynamic rupture of nonplanar faults subjected to regional loads in complex media. FDFE is based on a 3D methodology for applying dynamic-rupture boundary conditions along the fault surface. The fault is discretized by a set of parallelepiped fault elements in which specific boundary conditions are applied. These conditions are applied to the stress tensor, once transformed into a local fault reference frame. Numerically determined weight functions multiplying particle velocities around each element allow accurate estimates of fault kinematic parameters (i.e., slip and slip rate) independent of faulting mechanism. Assuming a Coulomb-like slip-weakening friction law, a parametric study suggests that the FDFE method converges toward a unique solution, provided that the cohesive zone behind the rupture front is well resolved (i.e., four or more elements inside this zone). Solutions are free of relevant numerical artifacts for grid sizes smaller than approximately 70 In. Results yielded by the FDFE approach are in good quantitative agreement with those obtained by a semianalytical boundary integral method along planar and nonplanar parabola-shaped faults. The FDFE method thus provides quantitative, accurate results for spontaneous-rupture simulations on intricate fault geometries.
引用
收藏
页码:SM123 / SM137
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D finite-difference transient electromagnetic modeling with a whole-space initial field
    Li, Fei
    Cheng, Jiulong
    GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 88 (03) : F15 - F27
  • [22] 3D finite-difference modeling of elastic wave propagation in the Laplace-Fourier domain
    Petrov, Petr V.
    Newman, Gregory A.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 77 (04) : T137 - T155
  • [23] 3D NUMERICAL MODELING OF PARAMETRIC SPEAKER USING FINITE-DIFFERENCE TIME-DOMAIN
    Zhu, Lijun
    Florencio, Dinei
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2015, : 5982 - 5986
  • [24] Computational methods for large-scale 3D acoustic finite-difference modeling: A tutorial
    Etgen, John T.
    O'Brien, Michael J.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (05) : SM223 - SM230
  • [25] COMPENSATING FINITE-DIFFERENCE ERRORS IN 3-D MIGRATION AND MODELING
    LI, ZM
    GEOPHYSICS, 1991, 56 (10) : 1650 - 1660
  • [26] 3D magnetotelluric modeling by using finite-difference method: Comparison study of different forward modeling approaches
    Varilsuha, Deniz
    Candansayar, Mehmet Emin
    GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (02) : WB51 - WB60
  • [27] 3D Fourier finite-difference common azimuth depth migration
    Zhang, LB
    Hua, BL
    Calandra, H
    Rector, JW
    Hoversten, M
    JOURNAL OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION, 2006, 14 (04): : 287 - 294
  • [28] 3D finite-difference synthetic acoustic log in cylindrical coordinates
    Pissarenko, D.
    Reshetova, G.
    Tcheverda, V.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2010, 234 (06) : 1766 - 1772
  • [29] 3D finite-difference synthetic acoustic logging in cylindrical coordinates
    Pissarenko, D.
    Reshetova, G. V.
    Tcheverda, V. A.
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2009, 57 (03) : 367 - 377
  • [30] 3D elastic waveform modeling with an optimized equivalent staggered-grid finite-difference method
    Qiang Zou
    Jian-Ping Huang
    Peng Yong
    Zhen-Chun Li
    Petroleum Science, 2020, (04) : 967 - 989