Spacer Design Options and Consideration for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

被引:17
|
作者
Sporer, Scott M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
periprosthetic infection; hip; spacer; articulating; static; 2-STAGE REVISION; HIP; ELUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
An articulating or nonarticulating antibiotic hip spacer can be placed following the first stage implant removal of a periprosthetic hip joint infection. Antibiotic spacers help fill in the dead space created at the time of resection and provide a high local concentration of antibiotics. Theoretical advantages of a static spacer include a higher elution of antibiotics because of the increased surface area, the ability to protect deficient bone in the proximal femur/acetabulum, and the ability to immobilize the periarticular soft tissues. Advantages of an articulating spacer include improved ambulation and easier motion for the patient, maintenance of soft tissue tension, and an easier surgical reconstruction at the time of the second stage. Additionally, an articulating antibiotic spacer may minimize the risk of dislocation following the second stage reconstruction. The choice of articulating or nonarticulating is currently one of surgeon preference yet it is advised that surgeons consider an articulating spacer for all patients except those with severe femoral/acetabular bone loss or deficient abductors. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S34
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection
    Thienpont, Emmanuel
    Yowbi, JeanCyr
    Cornu, Olivier
    Simon, Anne
    Stuyck, Jose
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2014, 80 (03): : 289 - 292
  • [42] Strategies for Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Riesgo, Aldo M.
    Liporace, Frank A.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2018, 76 (01): : 55 - 61
  • [43] Prevention of deep periprosthetic joint infection
    Hanssen, AD
    Osmon, DR
    Nelson, CL
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (03): : 458 - 471
  • [44] Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Editorial Comment
    Parvizi, Javad
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (04) : 915 - 916
  • [45] Definition of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Is There a Consensus?
    Parvizi, Javad
    Jacovides, Christina
    Zmistowski, Benjamin
    Jung, Kwang Am
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (11) : 3022 - 3030
  • [46] Lyme disease periprosthetic joint infection
    Yang, Theodore
    Shweta, Fnu
    Greatens, Marcus
    Webb, Jonathan
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [47] Periprosthetic joint infection: Current concept
    Vinay K. Aggarwal
    Mohammad R. Rasouli
    Javad Parvizi
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2013, 47 : 10 - 17
  • [48] Periprosthetic joint infection: what next?
    Rajput, V.
    Meek, R. M. D.
    Haddad, F. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2022, 104B (11): : 1193 - 1195
  • [49] Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Fungal Pathogens
    Brown, Timothy S.
    Petis, Stephen M.
    Osmon, Douglas R.
    Mabry, Tad M.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (08): : 2605 - 2612
  • [50] Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts
    Tortia, Rosalba
    Aloj, Domenico C.
    Borre, Silvio
    Rostagno, Roberto
    Basile, Giuseppe
    Leigheb, Massimiliano
    CHIRURGIA-ITALY, 2023, 36 (06): : 366 - 374