Fat necrosis after breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery

被引:26
|
作者
Nakada, Haruka [1 ]
Inoue, Masayuki [1 ]
Furuya, Kazushige [1 ]
Watanabe, Hideki [1 ]
Ikegame, Kou [1 ]
Nakayama, Yuko [2 ]
Ohmori, Masato [2 ]
Nakagomi, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Yamanashi Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Fujimi1-1-1, Kofu, Yamanashi 4008506, Japan
[2] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Surg 1, Yamanashi, Japan
关键词
Fat necrosis; Breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery; Free dermal fat flap; Pedicled fat flap; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; TUMOR RECURRENCE; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; WOMEN; IRRADIATION; LUMPECTOMY; CARCINOMA; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-018-0901-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundFat necrosis is a subjective early as well as delayed complication, which sometimes mimics local recurrence and ruins the quality of life by pain and poor cosmetic result. While, the frequency and severity of fat necrosis are important issues that breast surgeons should explain to the patient, these data are not revealed well.MethodsA total of 1476 patients who underwent breast surgery from January 2000 to December 2012 were enrolled in the present study. We assessed fat necrosis by mammographic and physical findings and created grading criteria: Grade (G) 0, no fat necrosis; G1, no symptomatic fat necrosis (mammographic dystrophic calcification); G2, mild symptomatic necrosis (mammographic dystrophic necrosis with tumor); G3, severe symptomatic necrosis (mammographic dystrophic necrosis with pain or skin change); and G4, symptomatic necrosis requiring surgical intervention.ResultsOf the 1476 patients enrolled, 393 (27%) underwent mastectomy, and 1083 (73%) underwent breast-conserving surgery. We achieved a high rate of breast-conserving surgery at a total rate of 73% over the study period and maximum rate of 88% in 2010, using oncoplastic procedures. We mainly adopted a pedicled fat flap (417/1083; 39%) and a free dermal fat flap (40/1083; 3.7%). Among the 626 patients who underwent partial resection with no replacement for the defect, G1-G2 fat necrosis was seen in 29/626 (4.6%). While, the incidence of fat necrosis with pedicled fat flap and free dermal fat graft was 68/417 (16%) and 40/40 (100%), respectively, showing a significant difference (p<0.01). Furthermore, the incidence of G3-G4 fat necrosis was significantly higher with free dermal fat grafts (25%; 10/40) than with pedicled flap (2.9%; 12/417) (p<0.01). Among pedicled flaps, the incidence of fat necrosis with inframammary adipofascial flaps was 56% (14/25) which was higher than that with lateral epidermal fat flaps (12%; 33/276) (p<0.01), and rotation of surrounding breast tissues (8%; 21/116) (p<0.01). The incidence of G3 fat necrosis was also high at 20% (5/25) in inframammary adipofascial flaps.ConclusionsBreast-conserving oncoplastic surgery carries a risk of fat necrosis as a delayed complication. The incidence rate and severity of fat necrosis with each procedure should be assessed. We should select fat grafts with a good blood supply to replace defects of breast-conserving therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 130
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating Need for Additional Imaging and Biopsy After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Crown, Angelena
    Laskin, Ruby
    Weed, Christina
    Rocha, Flavio G.
    Grumley, Janie
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (10) : 3650 - 3656
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: An updated meta-analysis
    Tian, Rui
    Zheng, Yu
    Liu, Ruikang
    Jiang, Chen
    Zheng, Hongmei
    BREAST, 2024, 77
  • [23] Breast MRI in DCIS size estimation, breast-conserving surgery and oncoplastic breast surgery
    Bartram, Alexander
    Gilbert, Fiona
    Thompson, Alastair
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Agrawal, Amit
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2021, 94
  • [24] Outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery compared to breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients
    Farooqi, Nifasat
    Vohra, Lubna
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 246 - 247
  • [25] Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review
    De La Cruz, Lucy
    Blankenship, Stephanie A.
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Geha, Rula
    Nocera, Nadia
    Czerniecki, Brian J.
    Tchou, Julia
    Fisher, Carla S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) : 3247 - 3258
  • [26] Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review
    Lucy De La Cruz
    Stephanie A. Blankenship
    Abhishek Chatterjee
    Rula Geha
    Nadia Nocera
    Brian J. Czerniecki
    Julia Tchou
    Carla S. Fisher
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 3247 - 3258
  • [27] Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery using latissimus dorsi miniflap
    Fakhry, H.
    Hamza, H.
    Ahmed, B.
    Abdelazeem, K.
    Mostafa, M.
    Amira, G.
    Elyamany, A.
    Shehata, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S262 - S262
  • [28] Usefulness of periareolar zigzag incision in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery
    Ko, B.
    Kim, H.
    Chung, I.
    Lee, S.
    Kim, J.
    Lee, J.
    Son, B.
    Ahn, S. H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (04)
  • [29] Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in African Women: A Systematic Review
    Adesunkanmi, Abdulhafiz Oladapo
    Wuraola, Funmilola Olanike
    Fagbayimu, Oluwatobiloba Michael
    Calcuttawala, Murtuza Aliasger
    Wahab, Tajudeen
    Adisa, Adewale Oluseye
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10
  • [30] Complications in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Oncoplastic Versus Conventional Techniques
    Apodaca-Ramos, Irasema
    Alejandro Maciel-Roman, Daniel
    Perez-Gonzalez, Yosef
    Pabel Miranda-Aguirre, Arturo
    Alberto Dominguez-Reyes, Carlos
    Villegas-Carlos, Felipe
    Alberto Tenorio-Torres, Juan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S209 - S209