The Impact of Density Ratio on the Liquid Core Dynamics of a Turbulent Liquid Jet Injected Into a Crossflow

被引:45
|
作者
Herrmann, Marcus [1 ]
Arienti, Marco [2 ]
Soteriou, Marios [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Engn Matter Transport & Energy, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] United Technol Res Ctr, Hartford, CT 06108 USA
关键词
2-PHASE MIXING LAYERS; SURFACE-TENSION; PRIMARY BREAKUP; AIR-FLOW; ATOMIZATION; SPRAY; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1115/1.4002273
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Atomizing liquids by injecting them into crossflows is a common approach in gas turbines and augmentors. Much of our current understanding of the processes resulting in atomization of the jets, the resulting jet penetration and spray drop size distribution have been obtained by performing laboratory experiments at ambient conditions. Yet, operating conditions under which jets in crossflows atomize can be far different from ambient. Hence, several dimensionless groups have been identified that are believed to determine jet penetration and resulting drop size distribution. These are usually the jet and crossflow Weber and Reynolds numbers and the momentum flux ratio. In this paper, we aim to answer the question of whether an additional dimensionless group, the liquid to gas density ratio must be matched. We perform detailed simulations of the primary atomization region using the refined level set grid (RLSG) method to track the motion of the liquid/gas phase interface. We employ a balanced force, interface projected curvature method to ensure high accuracy of the surface tension forces, use a multiscale approach to transfer broken off, small scale nearly spherical drops into a Lagrangian point particle description allowing for full two-way coupling and continued secondary atomization, and employ a dynamic Smagorinsky large eddy simulation (LES) approach in the single phase regions of the flow to describe turbulence. We present simulation results for a turbulent liquid jet (q = 6.6, We = 330, and Re = 14,000) injected into a gaseous crossflow (Re = 740,000) analyzed under ambient conditions (density ratio 816) experimentally by Brown and McDonnell [2006, "Near Field Behavior of a Liquid Jet in a Crossflow," Proceedings of the ILASS Americas, 19th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems]. We compare simulation results obtained using a liquid to gas density ratio of 10 and 100. The results show that the increase in density ratio causes a noticeable increase in liquid core penetration with reduced bending and spreading in the transverse directions. The post-primary atomization spray penetrates further in both the jet and transverse direction. Results further show that the penetration correlations for the windward side trajectory commonly reported in the literature strongly depend on the value of threshold probability used to identify the leading edge. Correlations based on penetration of the jet's liquid core center of mass, on the other hand, can provide a less ambiguous measure of jet penetration. Finally, the increase in density ratio results in a decrease in wavelength of the most dominant feature associated with a traveling wave along the jet as determined by proper orthogonal decomposition. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4002273]
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Primary atomization of a liquid jet in crossflow
    Rana, S.
    Herrmann, M.
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2011, 23 (09)
  • [33] LIQUID JET IN CROSSFLOW : EFFECT OF MOMENTUM FLUX RATIO ON SPRAY AND VAPORIZATION CHARACTERISTICS
    Kamin, Manu
    Khare, Prashant
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2019, VOL 4B, 2019,
  • [34] DNS and LES of primary atomization of turbulent liquid jet injection into a gaseous crossflow environment
    Mukundan, Anirudh Asuri
    Tretola, Giovanni
    Menard, Thibaut
    Herrmann, Marcus
    Navarro-Martinez, Salvador
    Vogiatzaki, Konstantina
    de Motta, Jorge Cesar Brandle
    Berlemont, Alain
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2021, 38 (02) : 3233 - 3241
  • [35] Primary atomization of a turbulent liquid jet in crossflow: a comparison between VOF and FGVT methods
    Bernardo Alan de Freitas Duarte
    Franco Barbi
    Millena Martins Villar
    Ricardo Serfaty
    Aristeu da Silveira Neto
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2020, 42
  • [36] Primary atomization of a turbulent liquid jet in crossflow: a comparison between VOF and FGVT methods
    de Freitas Duarte, Bernardo Alan
    Barbi, Franco
    Villar, Millena Martins
    Serfaty, Ricardo
    Neto, Aristeu da Silveira
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 42 (06)
  • [37] Liquid-solid two-phase jet in a turbulent crossflow: Experiments and simulations
    Octau, C.
    Dbouk, T.
    Watremez, M.
    Meresse, D.
    Lippert, M.
    Schiffler, J.
    Keirsbulck, L.
    Dubar, L.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2020, 155 : 156 - 171
  • [38] Numerical simulation of vorticity dynamics for turbulent jet in crossflow
    Jiang, Guo-Qiang
    Ren, Xiu-Wen
    Li, Wei
    Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21 (03): : 307 - 314
  • [39] PRIMARY BREAKUP INSTABILITY OF LIQUID JET IN CROSSFLOW
    Bhatia, Bharat
    Johny, Tom
    De, Ashoke
    COMPUTATIONAL THERMAL SCIENCES, 2024, 16 (02): : 15 - 31
  • [40] Spray characteristics of liquid jet in nonuniform crossflow
    Kong X.
    He W.
    Guo Z.
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37 (03): : 534 - 544