Ownership by Mutual Funds and Corporate Reporting of Environmental Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from China 2007-2019

被引:0
|
作者
Luo, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Lijun [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shu [2 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
[3] Wuxi Taihu Univ, Sch Accounting, Wuxi 214063, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
environmental awareness; shareholder activism; mutual fund; listed company; supervisory role; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; SHAREHOLDERS; FIRMS; BOARD;
D O I
10.3390/su132011527
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
After 40 years of economic ascendancy, China's environmental challenges and public awareness of them have swelled substantially. Both concern mutual funds that invest in publicly traded Chinese firms, many of which have shown questionable environmental responsibility. This study investigates whether mutual fund ownership of Chinese corporations influences firms' disclosures of environmental responsibility by empirical methodologies. Annual data for 25,188 firm-year observations of corporations trading as A-shares in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2007-2019 revealed that ownership by mutual funds, and especially by leading funds, correlates strongly and positively with environmental disclosures. These results imply that mutual funds were activist investors that influenced sampled firms to disclose their environmental responsibility during the period 2007-2019. We also examine environmental reporting and mutual fund stock ownership in relation to security analyst coverage, whether sampled firms are government-owned, and periods before and after the implementation of China's New Environmental Protection Law. Results are heterogeneous with respect to all three considerations. Our findings are significant for regulators, investors, and corporate managers.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of environmental subsidy on the performance of corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China
    Chen, Guifu
    Wei, Boyu
    Zhu, Ruoran
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [22] Legitimating Negative Aspects in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence From China
    Lin, Yuting
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION, 2019, 62 (03) : 263 - 278
  • [23] Corporate Ownership, Political Connections and M&A: Empirical Evidence from China
    Liu, Ningyue
    Wang, Liming
    Zhang, Min
    ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2013, 12 (03) : 41 - 57
  • [24] Employment protection and environmental corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China
    Liu, Haiming
    Chiang, Yao-Min
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 92
  • [25] Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: Evidence from China
    Kuo, Lopin
    Yeh, Chin-Chen
    Yu, Hui-Cheng
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 (05) : 273 - 287
  • [26] Does religion improve corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China
    Chen, Kejing
    Guo, Wenqi
    Kang, Yanling
    Wan, Qingqing
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (02) : 808 - 818
  • [27] Major government customer and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China
    Yu, Xiaojun
    Li, Qiang
    Zhang, Lin
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 183
  • [28] Can Environmental Regulations Promote Corporate Environmental Responsibility? Evidence from the Moderated Mediating Effect Model and an Empirical Study in China
    Peng, Benhong
    Tu, Yu
    Wei, Guo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [29] The Role of Mutual Funds in Corporate Governance: Evidence from Mutual Funds' Proxy Voting and Trading Behavior
    Duan, Ying
    Jiao, Yawen
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2016, 51 (02) : 489 - 513
  • [30] Do mutual fund networks affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Qi, Lujun
    Wang, Lixiang
    Li, Wei'an
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (02) : 1040 - 1050