Improved survival with adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy in lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer - A united states population-based assessment

被引:29
|
作者
Artinyan, Avo [1 ]
Hellan, Minia [1 ]
Mojica-Manosa, Pablo [1 ]
Chen, Yi-Jen [2 ]
Pezner, Richard [2 ]
Ellenhorn, Joshua D. I. [1 ]
Kim, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Gen Oncol Surg, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
关键词
pancreatic cancer; adjuvant radiation therapy; Surveillance; Epidemiology; End Results database; survival;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23134
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Although chemoradiation often is administered as an adjuvant to pancreatic cancer surgery, recent reports have disputed the benefit of radiation therapy The objective of this study was to determine the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with locally confined, lymph node-negative (N0) pancreatic cancer. METHODS. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was used to identify patients who had undergone cancer-directed surgery for N0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1988 and 2003. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to compare overall survival between patients who did and did not receive adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of EBRT when additional clinicopathologic factors were assessed. The analysis also examined the potential treatment selection bias of patients with Survival <3 months. RESULTS. A cohort of 1930 surgical patients with N0 disease was identified. The median Survival was 17 months. Irradiated patients had significantly better survival compared with nonirractiated patients (20 months vs 15 months, respectively; P <.001). On niultivariate analysis, adjuvant EBRT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72: 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.63-0.82; P <.001), age, grade, turner classification, and tumor location were independent predictors of survival. X Then patients with survival <3 months were excluded from the analysis, no difference in survival between the EBRT group and the nonradiation group was noted oil univariate comparison (P value not significant). However, oil multivariate analysis, EBRT remained an independent predictor of improved overall survival (HR, 0.87; 95% Cl, 0.75-1.00; P =.044). CONCLUSIONS. Adjuvant EBRT was associated with improved survival in patients with operable, N0 pancreatic cancer. Its use should be considered in patients who have early-stage N0 disease.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 42
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Is Effective for Patients With Lymph NodeePositive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
    Koulis, Theodora A.
    Nichol, Alan M.
    Truong, Pauline T.
    Speers, Caroline
    Gondara, Lovedeep
    Tyldesley, Scott
    Lohrisch, Caroline
    Weir, Lorna
    Olson, Robert A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (05): : 1150 - 1158
  • [22] Breast conserving therapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to mastectomy in early-stage, lymph node-negative breast cancer
    Almahariq, Muayad F.
    Quinn, Thomas J.
    Siddiqui, Zaid
    Jawad, Maha S.
    Chen, Peter Y.
    Gustafson, Gregory S.
    Dilworth, Joshua T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 142 : 186 - 194
  • [23] Relationship between survival and lymph node assessment from a population-based study of colorectal cancer patients
    Urquhart, R.
    Bu, J.
    Porter, G. A.
    Dewar, R.
    Moineddin, R.
    Grunfeld, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [24] Survival Following Sublobar Resection for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With or Without Adjuvant External Beam Radiation Therapy A Population-Based Study
    Rineer, Justin
    Schreiber, David
    Katsoulakis, Evangelia
    Nabhani, Thomas
    Han, Peter
    Lange, Christopher
    Choi, Kwang
    Rotman, Marvin
    CHEST, 2010, 137 (02) : 362 - 368
  • [25] Lymph node dissection could bring survival benefits to patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based, propensity score-matched study
    Dong, Fan
    Xu, Tianyuan
    Wang, Xianjin
    Shen, Yifan
    Zhang, Xiaohua
    Chen, Shanwen
    Zhong, Shan
    Zhang, Minguang
    Ding, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 24 (03) : 296 - 305
  • [26] Lymph node dissection could bring survival benefits to patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based, propensity score-matched study
    Fan Dong
    Tianyuan Xu
    Xianjin Wang
    Yifan Shen
    Xiaohua Zhang
    Shanwen Chen
    Shan Zhong
    Minguang Zhang
    Qiang Ding
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2019, 24 : 296 - 305
  • [28] External beam radiation therapy improves survival in low-volume metastatic prostate cancer patients: a North American population-based study
    Lara Franziska Stolzenbach
    Marina Deuker
    Claudia Collà-Ruvolo
    Luigi Nocera
    Mila Mansour
    Zhe Tian
    Derya Tilki
    Thomas Steuber
    Alberto Briganti
    Fred Saad
    Felix K. H. Chun
    Markus Graefen
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2021, 24 : 253 - 260
  • [29] Role of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Lymph Node-negative Esophageal Cancer After Resection A Population-based Study With Propensity Score-matched Analysis
    Yang, Yang
    Zhou, Xia
    Tang, Luoyong
    Xu, Xiaoling
    Du, Xianghui
    Qiu, Guoqin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 42 (12): : 924 - 931
  • [30] External beam radiation therapy improves survival in low-volume metastatic prostate cancer patients: a North American population-based study
    Stolzenbach, Lara Franziska
    Deuker, Marina
    Colla-Ruvolo, Claudia
    Nocera, Luigi
    Mansour, Mila
    Tian, Zhe
    Tilki, Derya
    Steuber, Thomas
    Briganti, Alberto
    Saad, Fred
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2021, 24 (01) : 253 - 260