Prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: importance of functional recovery by 3 months after surgery

被引:8
|
作者
Nakamura, Yosuke [1 ]
Gotoh, Masafumi [1 ]
Mitsui, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Nakamura, Hidehiro [1 ]
Ohzono, Hiroki [1 ]
Okawa, Takahiro [1 ]
Shiba, Naoto [1 ]
机构
[1] Kurume Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 155-1 Kokubu Machi, Kurume, Fukuoka 8390863, Japan
关键词
Rotator cuff tear; Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Prognostic factor; Functional recovery; Japanese Orthopedic Association score; Visual analog scale; Elevation; UNIVERSITY-OF-CALIFORNIA; SINGLE-ROW; TEARS; SHOULDER; INTEGRITY; STIFFNESS; FAILURE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-018-1014-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To examine important factors that affect clinical outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Methods: Among 163 patients who underwent ARCR, we included 71 shoulders in 71 patients whose progress was monitored for > 2 years, postoperatively. We divided the patients into groups A (scores >= 83 points, 59 patients) and B (scores <83 points, 12 patients) using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score at 24 months. We then conducted univariate and multivariate analyses of pre- and postoperative (2 and 3 months, respectively) factors. Results: The mean JOA score for all patients significantly improved from 63.7 +/- 11.5 points preoperatively to 90.3 +/- 9.6 points at 24 months postoperatively (P<0.05). However, there were no significant between-group differences in the preoperative scores. In addition, there were no significant differences in the postoperative re-tear rate. Univariate analysis revealed that the range of motion (preoperative abduction and postoperative elevation, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation), muscle strength (external rotation 3 months postoperatively), postoperative pain level [visual analog scale (VAS) maximum score, 10 points], partial repair, Cofield classification, and preoperative width were significant factors (P<0.05 for all factors). Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that VAS at 2 months postoperatively and elevation at 3 months postoperatively were significant factors. Conclusions: To obtain a JOA score of 83 points at 24 months postoperatively, following ARCR, a postoperative VAS of <5 points at 2months and postoperative elevation of >= 110 degrees at 3 months should be achieved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic factors affecting structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a clinical and histological study (vol 26, pg 10, 2023)
    Wang, Pei Wei
    Jo, Chris Hyunchul
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2023, 26 (02): : 217 - 217
  • [32] Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Brislin, Kenneth J.
    Field, Larry D.
    Savoie, Felix H., III
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (02): : 124 - 128
  • [33] Functional and Imaging Outcomes of Arthroscopic Simultaneous Rotator Cuff Repair and Bankart Repair After Shoulder Dislocations
    Shields, Edward
    Mirabelli, Mark
    Amsdell, Simon
    Thorsness, Robert
    Goldblatt, John
    Maloney, Michael
    Voloshin, Ilya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (11): : 2614 - 2620
  • [34] Analysis of Functional Recovery and Subjective Well-Being after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Adomaviciene, Ausra
    Daunoraviciene, Kristina
    Sidlauskaite, Rusne
    Griskevicius, Julius
    Kubilius, Raimondas
    Varjaityte, Lina
    Raistenskis, Juozas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (07):
  • [35] Impact of smoking on patient outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Naimark, Micah
    Robbins, Christopher B.
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Landfair, Germanual
    Carpenter, James
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Miller, Bruce S.
    BMJ OPEN SPORT & EXERCISE MEDICINE, 2018, 4 (01):
  • [36] The Incidence of Subsequent Surgery After Outpatient Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Mahure, Siddharth A.
    Mollon, Brent
    Shamah, Steven D.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Kwon, Young W.
    Rokito, Andrew S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (08): : 1531 - 1541
  • [37] Outcomes After Revision Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Krez, Alexandra N.
    Wu, Kevin A.
    Levin, Jay
    Crook, Bryan S.
    Anakwenze, Oke A.
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (06): : 1635 - 1640
  • [38] Functional Outcome After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair - An Early Experience
    Khoo, S. W.
    Khoo, S. M.
    Yeong, Y. K.
    Towil, B.
    MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2009, 3 (02) : 29 - 32
  • [39] Functional and Structural Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections
    Feng, Sijia
    Li, Huizhu
    Zhong, Yuting
    Xie, Yuxue
    Chen, Jun
    Chen, Yuzhou
    Chen, Shiyi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (03): : 733 - 742
  • [40] Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair
    Maria Valencia Mora
    Diana Morcillo Barrenechea
    Maria Dolores Martín Ríos
    Antonio M. Foruria
    Emilio Calvo
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 2157 - 2163