Five-year interim comparison of the Guidant bifurcated endograft with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

被引:78
|
作者
Moore, WS
Matsumura, JS
Makaroun, MS
Katzen, BT
Deaton, DH
Decker, M
Walker, G
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Div Vasc Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Div Vasc Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Presbyterian Univ Hosp, Washington, DC USA
[4] Baptist Hlth S Florida, Washington, DC USA
[5] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[6] Guidant Endovasc Solut Inc, Menlo Pk, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00410-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study was undertaken to compare 1-year and 5-year results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with the Guidant/EVT bifurcated graft system with results of open repair. Methods. This was a prospective, nonrandomized, concurrent controlled study that compared results of endovascular versus open repair of AAA. The Phase II study with the EGS delivery system included 268 patients in 18 US medical centers; and the Phase III trial with the Ancure delivery system incuded 305 patients in 21 US institutions. Data were internally and externally audited and subjected to periodic review by the US Food and Drug Administration. The control group of I II patients were excluded from endovascular repair with a tube graft because of anatomic considerations, but were otherwise comparable to the experimental group. Patients in the control group underwent conventional open surgical repair concurrently with patients who underwent EGS repair in 18 US institutions. Results. Five hundred thirty-one of 573 patients (92.7%) underwent successful implantation of the Guidant/EVT bifurcated endograft. The combined major morbidity and mortality in the endograft group was 28.8%, compared with 44.1% in the open control group. Additional benefits in the endograft group included shorter hospital stay (2 days vs 6 days), less surgical blood loss (400 mL vs 800 mL), and less intensive care unit use (33% vs 94%). These early results are reported on an intent-to-treat basis; in all patients an attempt was made to treat with the endovascular graft, including those patients in whom conversion to standard open repair was necessary during the primary procedure. Three hundred nineteen patients were selected for long-term follow-up to 5 years, on the basis of date of implantation; ie, patients with the earliest implantations were followed up for 5 years. The primary purpose of long-term follow-up was to obtain data on long-term efficacy of the graft; thus only patients in whom implantation was successful were selected. No patient has experienced an-aneurysm rupture to date. Survival (Kaplan-Meier method) in the experimental group was 68.1%, compared with 77.2% in the control group (P = NS). At 60 months, 74.4% of patients (32 of 43) were free of endoleak. There were no type I or type III endoleaks remaining. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased or remained stable in 97.6% of patients (41 of 42) and increased in only I patient. During the course of long-term follow-up, post-procedural conversion to open repair was required in only 9 patients (2.8%). Conclusion: The EVT/Guidant bifurcated graft is effective in preventing AAA rupture, and long-term survival is comparable to that with open repair.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 55
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endograft Conformability and Aortoiliac Tortuosity in Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Lee, Kevin
    Leci, Erik
    Forbes, Thomas
    Dubois, Luc
    DeRose, Guy
    Power, Adam
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2014, 21 (05) : 728 - 734
  • [32] Five-year results of endovascular aortic repair used according to instructions for use give a good general outcome for abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Unsgard, Runa G.
    Altreuther, Martin
    Lange, Conrad
    Hammer, Tommy
    Mattsson, Erney
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [33] Clinical experience with a bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Chuter, TAM
    Risberg, B
    Hopkinson, BR
    Wendt, G
    Scott, RAP
    Walker, PJ
    Viscomi, S
    White, G
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (04) : 655 - 666
  • [34] TRANSFEMORAL ENDOLUMINAL REPAIR OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM WITH BIFURCATED GRAFT
    YUSUF, SW
    BAKER, DM
    CHUTER, TAM
    WHITAKER, SC
    WENHAM, PW
    HOPKINSON, BR
    LANCET, 1994, 344 (8923): : 650 - 651
  • [35] Five-year outcomes of the PYTHAGORAS US clinical trial of the Aorfix endograft for endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with highly angulated aortic necks DISCUSSION
    Maldonado, Thomas
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    Fairman, Ronald
    Starnes, Benjamin
    Powell, Janet
    Abularrage, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 1606 - 1607
  • [36] Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Schmitz-Rixen, Thomas
    Boeckler, Dittmar
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Grundmann, Reinhart T.
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 117 (48): : 813 - 819
  • [37] Open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a centenarian
    Lath, Nikesh R.
    Rai, Kumar
    Alshafie, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (01) : 216 - 218
  • [38] Clinical effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting: 7-year concurrent comparison with open repair
    Cao, P
    Verzini, F
    Parlani, G
    Romano, L
    De Rango, P
    Pagliuca, V
    Iacono, G
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 40 (05) : 841 - 848
  • [39] A comparison of contemporary mortality following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Coleman, Dawn M.
    Davis, Frank
    Osborne, Nicholas H.
    Scally, Christopher
    Lee, Jay
    Ranella, Michael
    Eliason, Jonathan L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (03) : S152 - S152
  • [40] Direct aortic access for endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using a bifurcated endograft as a branched device
    Lu, Jeffrey
    Blitzer, David
    Torrellas, Gabriel A. Pereira
    Hall, Michael
    Kang, Jeanwan
    Toursavadkohi, Shahab
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY CASES INNOVATIONS AND TECHNIQUES, 2023, 9 (01): : 91 - 96