Efficacy and safety of cardiac shock wave therapy for patients with severe coronary artery disease: A randomized, double-blind control study

被引:9
|
作者
Jia, Na [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ruisheng [1 ]
Liu, Baoyi [1 ]
Liu, Bing [1 ]
Qi, Xin [1 ]
Lan, Ming [1 ]
Liu, Junmeng [1 ]
Zeng, Ping [3 ]
Chen, Congxia [4 ]
Li, Wenchan [4 ]
Guo, Yue [4 ]
Yao, Zhiming [4 ]
He, Qing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing Hosp, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Inst Geriatr Med,Dept Cardiol, 1 Dahua Rd, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Union Med Coll, Grad Sch Peking, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Beijing Inst Geriatr, Dept Epidemiol,Key Lab Geriatr,Natl Hlth Commiss, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing Hosp, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Inst Geriatr,Dept Nucl Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
CAD; myocardial ischemia; myocardial perfusion imaging; cardiac shock wave therapy; ASNC IMAGING GUIDELINES; ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA; ANGINA; QUESTIONNAIRE; MECHANISMS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-021-02768-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Previous studies proved the efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who are not candidate for reperfusion therapy. Randomized control trials are limited. We try to explore the efficacy and safety of CSWT for patients with severe CAD. Methods Thirty patients with severe CAD who had obvious ischemia on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the CSWT group or the control group. They had received optimal medication treatment for at least three months. Nine sessions of shock wave therapy were conducted over 3 months. CSWT group received the real treatment, while the control group received the pseudo-treatment. Clinical symptom, imaging outcomes and safety parameters were compared between two groups. Results After treatment, regional stress score (P = .023), improvement rate (IR) of ischemic area (IA) stress (P < .001) and IR of IA difference (P < .001) were significantly favor CSWT group. The interaction of summed rest score (P < .001), summed stress score (P = .004), summed difference score (P = .036) were significantly improved in the CSWT group compared to the control group. Seattle angina questionnaire, quality of life (QOL) and the distance of six-minute walking test (6MWT) were improved in both groups without significant difference between them. Hemodynamic parameters were stable during procedure. Myocardial injury markers showed no changes in two groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrated CSWT could effectively and safely improve myocardial perfusion in patients with severe CAD. Clinical symptom, QOL and 6MWT were all improved after treatment, but no significant difference between two groups.
引用
收藏
页码:2404 / 2419
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Donepezil in Parkinson's disease dementia: A randomized, double-blind efficacy and safety study
    Dubois, Bruno
    Tolosa, Eduardo
    Katzenschlager, Regina
    Emre, Murat
    Lees, Andrew J.
    Schumann, Guenther
    Pourcher, Emmanuelle
    Gray, Julian
    Thomas, Gail
    Swartz, Jina
    Hsu, Timothy
    Moline, Margaret L.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2012, 27 (10) : 1230 - 1238
  • [22] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of AdVEGF121 BIOBYPASS gene therapy in patients with refractory advanced coronary artery disease. The NOVA
    Kastrup, J.
    Joergensen, E.
    Fuchs, S.
    Nikol, S.
    Boedtker, H. E.
    Baldazzi, F.
    Kornowski, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 799 - 799
  • [23] Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in 'fast track' coronary artery bypass graft surgery:: a randomized, double-blind study
    Möllhoff, T
    Herregods, L
    Moerman, A
    Blake, D
    MacAdams, C
    Demeyere, R
    Kirnö, K
    Dybvik, T
    Shaikh, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (05) : 718 - 726
  • [24] Safety and efficacy of iloperidone in patients with psychotic disorders: A randomized, double-blind multicenter study
    Matkovits-Gupta, T
    Cucchiaro, J
    El-Bizri, H
    Fairweather, D
    Klonowski, E
    Lasser, R
    Nann-Vernotica, E
    Narurkar, M
    Pirrozi, C
    Waltrip, R
    Young, F
    Gharabawi, G
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (1-2) : 238 - 238
  • [25] A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Talactoferrin in Patients With Severe Sepsis
    Guntupalli, Kalpalatha
    Dean, Nathan
    Morris, Peter E.
    Bandi, Venkata
    Margolis, Benjamin
    Rivers, Emanuel
    Levy, Mitchell
    Lodato, Robert F.
    Ismail, Preeti M.
    Reese, Amber
    Schaumberg, John P.
    Malik, Rajesh
    Dellinger, R. Phillip
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (03) : 706 - 716
  • [26] DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF THE ANTIANGINAL AND ANTIISCHEMIC EFFICACY OF FENDILINE AND DILTIAZEM IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    SCHULZ, J
    LUBNAU, E
    GROSSMANN, M
    RUCK, W
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1991, 12 (08) : 521 - 539
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of Losigamone in partial seizures: a randomized double-blind study
    Baulac, M
    Klement, S
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (03) : 177 - 189
  • [28] Effect of cardiac shock wave therapy on the microvolt T wave alternans of patients with coronary artery disease
    Zhao, Ling
    Yang, Ping
    Tang, Yaming
    Li, Ruijie
    Peng, Yunzhu
    Wang, Yu
    Pu, Lijin
    Guo, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 16463 - 16471
  • [29] Efficacy of Varenicline in Patients With Severe Alcohol Dependence A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized and Controlled Study
    Pfeifer, Philippe
    Fehr, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 39 (04) : 398 - 402
  • [30] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Taoren Honghua Jian granule in patients with stable coronary artery disease
    Wang, Yiru
    Zhang, Yiyi
    Du, Yiyue
    Yang, Ying
    Wei, Jing
    Zhang, Na
    Mao, Meijiao
    Du, Wenting
    Liu, Ping
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (44) : e17753