Efficacy and safety of cardiac shock wave therapy for patients with severe coronary artery disease: A randomized, double-blind control study

被引:9
|
作者
Jia, Na [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ruisheng [1 ]
Liu, Baoyi [1 ]
Liu, Bing [1 ]
Qi, Xin [1 ]
Lan, Ming [1 ]
Liu, Junmeng [1 ]
Zeng, Ping [3 ]
Chen, Congxia [4 ]
Li, Wenchan [4 ]
Guo, Yue [4 ]
Yao, Zhiming [4 ]
He, Qing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing Hosp, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Inst Geriatr Med,Dept Cardiol, 1 Dahua Rd, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Union Med Coll, Grad Sch Peking, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Beijing Inst Geriatr, Dept Epidemiol,Key Lab Geriatr,Natl Hlth Commiss, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing Hosp, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Inst Geriatr,Dept Nucl Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
CAD; myocardial ischemia; myocardial perfusion imaging; cardiac shock wave therapy; ASNC IMAGING GUIDELINES; ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA; ANGINA; QUESTIONNAIRE; MECHANISMS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-021-02768-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Previous studies proved the efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who are not candidate for reperfusion therapy. Randomized control trials are limited. We try to explore the efficacy and safety of CSWT for patients with severe CAD. Methods Thirty patients with severe CAD who had obvious ischemia on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the CSWT group or the control group. They had received optimal medication treatment for at least three months. Nine sessions of shock wave therapy were conducted over 3 months. CSWT group received the real treatment, while the control group received the pseudo-treatment. Clinical symptom, imaging outcomes and safety parameters were compared between two groups. Results After treatment, regional stress score (P = .023), improvement rate (IR) of ischemic area (IA) stress (P < .001) and IR of IA difference (P < .001) were significantly favor CSWT group. The interaction of summed rest score (P < .001), summed stress score (P = .004), summed difference score (P = .036) were significantly improved in the CSWT group compared to the control group. Seattle angina questionnaire, quality of life (QOL) and the distance of six-minute walking test (6MWT) were improved in both groups without significant difference between them. Hemodynamic parameters were stable during procedure. Myocardial injury markers showed no changes in two groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrated CSWT could effectively and safely improve myocardial perfusion in patients with severe CAD. Clinical symptom, QOL and 6MWT were all improved after treatment, but no significant difference between two groups.
引用
收藏
页码:2404 / 2419
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of cardiac shock wave therapy for patients with severe coronary artery disease: A randomized, double-blind control study
    Na Jia
    Ruisheng Zhang
    Baoyi Liu
    Bing Liu
    Xin Qi
    Ming Lan
    Junmeng Liu
    Ping Zeng
    Congxia Chen
    Wenchan Li
    Yue Guo
    Zhiming Yao
    Qing He
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022, 29 : 2404 - 2419
  • [2] A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND AND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF THE EXTRACORPOREAL CARDIAC SHOCK WAVE THERAPY FOR CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
    Yang Ping
    Guo Tao
    Peng Yun-zhu
    Wang Yu
    Zhou Ping
    Cai Hong-yan
    Luo Zhi-ling
    Zhao Ling
    Gu Yun
    Yang Hong-wen
    HEART, 2011, 97
  • [3] Randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial of extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy for coronary heart disease
    Ping Yang
    Tao Guo
    Wei Wang
    Yun-Zhu Peng
    Yu Wang
    Ping Zhou
    Zhi-Ling Luo
    Hong-Yan Cai
    Ling Zhao
    Hong-Wen Yang
    Heart and Vessels, 2013, 28 : 284 - 291
  • [4] Randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial of extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy for coronary heart disease
    Yang, Ping
    Guo, Tao
    Wang, Wei
    Peng, Yun-Zhu
    Wang, Yu
    Zhou, Ping
    Luo, Zhi-Ling
    Cai, Hong-Yan
    Zhao, Ling
    Yang, Hong-Wen
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2013, 28 (03) : 284 - 291
  • [5] The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on plantar fasciitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Özgür Can Caner
    Seçilay Güneş
    Derya Gökmen
    Şebnem Ataman
    Şehim Kutlay
    Rheumatology International, 2022, 42 : 581 - 589
  • [6] Double-Blind and Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Extracorporeal Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy for Severe Angina Pectoris
    Kikuchi, Yoku
    Ito, Kenta
    Ito, Yoshitaka
    Shiroto, Takashi
    Tsuburaya, Ryuji
    Aizawa, Kentaro
    Hao, Kiyotaka
    Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
    Takahashi, Jun
    Takeda, Morihiko
    Nakayama, Masaharu
    Yasuda, Satoshi
    Kuriyama, Shinichi
    Tsuji, Ichiro
    Shimokawa, Hiroaki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (03) : 589 - 591
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on plantar fasciitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Caner, Ozgur Can
    Gunes, Secilay
    Gokmen, Derya
    Ataman, Sebnem
    Kutlay, Sehim
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 42 (04) : 581 - 589
  • [8] The efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy in the treatment of refractory angina: A pilot prospective, randomized, double-blind trial
    Leibowitz, David
    Weiss, A. Teddy
    Rott, David
    Durst, Ronen
    Lotan, Chaim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 167 (06) : 3033 - 3034
  • [9] Cardiac shock wave therapy and myocardial perfusion in severe coronary artery disease
    Kaller, M.
    Faber, L.
    Bogunovic, N.
    Horstkotte, D.
    Burchert, W.
    Lindner, Oliver
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 104 (10) : 843 - 849
  • [10] Cardiac shock wave therapy and myocardial perfusion in severe coronary artery disease
    M. Kaller
    L. Faber
    N. Bogunovic
    D. Horstkotte
    W. Burchert
    Oliver Lindner
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2015, 104 : 843 - 849