Disentangling the Bidirectional Relationships Across the Corporate Sustainable Development Indicators

被引:2
|
作者
Kyaw, Khine [1 ]
Pindado, Julio [2 ,3 ]
de-la-Torre, Chabela [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU Business Sch, N-7030 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ Salamanca, IME, Campus Miguel Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Corporate sustainable development; Economic indicator; Environmental indicator; Social indicator; Governance indicator; Dynamic panel data; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; INVESTOR PROTECTION; BOARD DIVERSITY; PANEL-DATA; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-022-02899-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study disentangles the relationships that exist between the four indicators of corporate sustainable development: economic, environmental, social, and governance. We account for the potential bidirectionality of the relationships, control for the dynamic nature of the sustainability process, and address the endogeneity problem to appropriately analyze the sustainability process. We estimated a panel data from 734 U.S. companies from 2004 through 2016 by using the system generalized method of moments and find evidence of a clear dynamic nature of the businesses' sustainability process. The results show that the current levels of the four sustainable development indicators are strongly determined by the levels of these indicators in the two previous years. Our results also show that corporate sustainable development follows a virtuous circle. The relationships across the economic, environmental, and social indicators are bidirectional and positive. Hence, these three sustainability indicators do not compete for available resources. On the contrary, they are tightly interconnected in a firm's sustainable development processes. Therefore, practitioners and regulators should consider these indicators simultaneously to promote sustainability in businesses and apply long-term sustainability policies. Altogether, our evidence supports the idea that firms can do good by doing well, and they do well by doing good.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 320
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Review of indicators for sustainable energy development
    Gunnarsdottir, I.
    Davidsdottir, B.
    Worrell, E.
    Sigurgeirsdottir, S.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 133
  • [42] An approach to define sustainable development indicators
    Tulbure, I
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO NATURAL AND SOCIAL DYNAMICS, 2001, : 469 - 479
  • [43] THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR
    Oleg, Margina
    Irina, Popa
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2012, 59 : 188 - 195
  • [44] Comparative international indicators of sustainable development
    Parris, TM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 38 (04): : 3 - 3
  • [45] Ecological indicators and indices of sustainable development
    Belousova, A
    [J]. IMPACTS OF URBAN GROWTH ON SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY, 1999, (259): : 83 - 90
  • [46] Ecological indicators and indices of sustainable development
    Belousova, Anna
    [J]. IAHS-AISH Publication, 1999, (259): : 83 - 90
  • [47] THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE INDICATORS OF RISK MANAGEMENT
    Cristea, Lidia
    Cristea, Enona
    Gradea, Cristina
    [J]. 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, SGEM 2012, Vol. IV, 2012, : 1185 - 1189
  • [48] A survey of national sustainable development indicators
    Tasaki, Tomohiro
    Kameyama, Yasuko
    Seiji, Hashimoto
    Moriguchi, Yuichi
    Hideo, Harasawa
    [J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2010, 13 (04) : 337 - 361
  • [49] Indicators for sustainable energy development in Lithuania
    Streimikiene, D
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2005, 29 (04) : 322 - 333
  • [50] Accounting for progress: Indicators for sustainable development
    Atkinson, G
    Hamilton, K
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 38 (07): : 16 - +